Lake Ashton Community Development District

Mike Costello, Chairman Borden Deane, Vice Chairman
Bob Ference, Assistant Secretary Robert Plummer, Assistant Secretary Harry Krumrie, Assistant Secretary

November 18, 2019
Lake Ashton Community Development District

5385 N. Nob Hill Road, Sunrise, Florida 33351
Phone: 954-721-8681- Fax: 954-721-9202

November 8, 2019

Board of Supervisors Lake Ashton
Community Development District

Dear Board Members:
The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District will be held on November 18, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Clubhouse Ballroom, 4141 Ashton Club Drive, Lake Wales, Florida 33859. Following is the agenda:
Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance

Approval of Meeting Agenda

Public Comments on Specific Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting)

Approval of the Minutes of the October 21, 2019, October 24, 2019, and October 30, 2019 Meetings

Engineer's Report

Unfinished Business

New Business and Supervisors Requests
Review and Ranking of RFQs for Engineering Services
Consideration of Resolution #2020-01 Amending the Fiscal Year 2019 General Fund Budget

Monthly Reports
Attorney
Community Director
Monthly Report
Consideration of Handicap Door Opener Quotes

Consideration of Quotes to Replace Portico Lights
Ratification of Card Room Chairs Surplus
Field Operations Manager - Monthly Report

COD Manager

Financial Reports
Approval of Check Run Summary
Combined Balance Sheet

Public Comments

Adjournment
MINUTES OF MEETING
LAKE ASHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District was held on Monday, October 21, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Clubhouse Ballroom, 4141 Ashton Club Drive, Lakes Wales, Florida 33859.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Mike Costello Borden Deane Robert Plummer Bob Ference Harry Krumrie

Also present:

Jillian Burns Andrew d'Adesky Jan Carpenter Rey Malave Christine Wells Matt Fisher Sarah Sandy
Numerous residents
Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Governmental Management Services District Counsel
District Counsel District Engineer Community Director
Field Operations Manager Hopping, Green & Sams

FIRST  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Ms. Burns called the roll and established a quorum was present and led the pledge of allegiance.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Meeting Agenda
Mr. Costello: Ok, we need an approval of the meeting agenda.
Mr. Deane:	With regards to the agenda under New Business and Supervisor Requests I would like to add an Item C, the restaurant.
Mr. Costello: Ok, anything else?
Mr. Plummer: Should we change the order and have the election? Mr. Costello: In speaking with the attorney we can't do that.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment on Specific Items
on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting)
Mr. Costello: Public comments and it is on some specific items that are on the agenda.
Mr. Buran: My name is Ronald Buran. I live at 3002 Ashton Palms Drive, Lake Wales. First item is I want to urge the Board to fill the COD Board vacancy with Steve Realmuto. On his previous appearances where he has asked questions, he has proved to be calm in demeanor. He is very analytical and he is smart. On the second item, I want to give you congratulations on your decision to not participate in the golf course acquisition and I implore you to not reverse on the best decision you have ever made. Owning this golf course would be a disaster waiting to happen and the majority of residents have no interest in paying the enormous and continuing assessments that will be required to operate the 36 hole golf course and we cannot afford to pay. I say this as a person who has lived on a failed golf course. I played on several golf courses that have failed, at least two of them in Charlotte County. Even the courses in Lakeland and Bartow have had difficulties as reported and many of you have probably heard of the Lake Wales County Club. The tax consequences of letting the public play out on this course is not an option in my opinion as reported by the tax assessor.
Mr. Costello: Thank you. Mr. Les Jacobson.
Mr. Jacobson:  Good morning.  I would also like to talk about the candidates.  First of all, I did read all of the resumes and letters that were submitted, and we are very fortunate to have such a high quality and quantity of people that would in fact do a good job. I think maybe one or two not, but it seems like you probably could not go wrong. However, one of the candidates did in fact run for election, put himself out there, and fell just short of votes, Harry Krumrie, which  suggests to me that he has a lot of support of a  lot of people who voted for him, and I would urge you to choose him, all other things being equal. Next, I would like to address  the three members  who voted to pull out of the deal on the golf course while all the comments we hear are valid. Those are opposed to it certainly raised good points, but all you have to do is look around the community,  what  has happened in the last several months with the developers reducing maintenance on

the ponds and what else he is going to do bare minimum. I heard all the excuses or reasons. He didn't give us enough information. Let's wait, wait, wait. He is going to give it to us for nothing if we wait. Let's be realistic, that is a bunch of nonsense. You have spent thousands of dollars of our money getting expert opinions and reports, both of whom came out and gave you every fact and figure you need to make an informed decision. They both suggested that it was feasible and that we can do it even if we have to have a small assessment. The most important thing is protecting our property values. It is not just a golf course. A lot of the money in that golf course operation goes to maintain those items that are really for the benefit of all the homeowners, whether they will admit or not. Even if we do have to pay an assessment, it shouldn't be a number that would hurt anybody in here. I heard $250 - $300 a year, whatever it is, it is well worth it. It is proven that if we don't do it, our home values will drop significantly. It is kind of like an insurance policy to maintain our value here. Everybody bought in here because of the way this place looks and the amenities and what we have. You are now beginning to see if we don't do it what will happen. I live on the main pond as you enter the development and there are 24 homeowners on that pond. They now have been circulating a petition they want to maintain this pond by themselves. It will cost us $400 a home the first shot, and then $200 thereafter every time they have to come in and do something. We can get the whole golf course and everything for a lot less than that. It just doesn't seem to make sense to me. I don't understand it. I wish you guys would show some leadership, which you haven't done so far. Don't give me that. I have a right to speak.
Mr. Costello: Did I say a word?
Mr. Jacobsen:  Yes,  sheesh.  That is the problem, listen to the people.   Secondly, if you won't lead, then follow.  At least we have leaders  over  on the West who are willing to help us out.
Ms. Burns: Your time it up.
Mr. Jacobsen: If you won't lead, then get out of the way. My time is up, so lastly, if you have your home up for sale you should resign from the Board.
Mr. Costello: Margot Stevens.
Ms. Stevens: I live on that lake that he is talking about. His figures are incorrect. However, all I want is to know who is going to take care of it? If we don't do it ourselves

it seems like nobody is interested in taking care of it. You guys haven't done anything about it. It is up to us. I would like very  much to have you contribute  taking down  all  those weeds that have grown around the lake. Then, we will take care  of the water.  We will get all of the hydrilla out of it and all of the other things that are growing. We are going to have a swamp very soon. We are going to have an alligator nest very soon. I'm not anxious for that at. Mr. Costello you are leaning back, folding your arms and looking very smug. I'm sorry, I'm one of those people who live here and have done so since 2003. I would like very much to have you do something about the lakes, not just our lake,  all of  the lakes.  Get on the horn and call.  Do something.   Keith and I have ourselves  gone to all of the facilities we know to go to and you are our best thought because you are in charge. Do something.
Mr. Costello: Thank you. Steve Realmuto.
Mr. Realmuto: Before my three minutes start I really would like to know whether the candidates are going to be provided an opportunity to speak because I did have comments that I submitted a request for to speak on agendas items. If I need to I will provide them, but tell me that, please?
Mr. d'Adesky: We have to discuss that when the item comes up, unfortunately. If anybody is permitted then, everybody has to be permitted to speak.
Mr. Costello: It will be done on an equal basis. Ms. Burns: You have your time now.
Mr. Realmuto: I guess I will condense my statements. First, my comments on the agenda items, I wanted to point out that we are facing a broad range of important issues, the golf course and continued operation being the foremost among them right now. I understand the COD II Board was asking you to take several actions today. I don't have time to numerate them but they are very important to address, and hopefully you will be at full strength when you do that. While I like to maintain a healthy skepticism and generally support our acquisition of the golf course lands within our boundaries under the right terms, the devil is always in the details. I do believe we can make it happen  if we all had the  desire to. I do strongly urge you to oppose any effort to move the boundaries or to give the Winter Haven COD recreation powers within Lake Wales. As you know that is up for discussion as this has the potential to adversely affect our residents especially those with

homes along Stone Creek Loop and adjourning streets. There are many other primary issues requiring your active leadership.   I won't list them, but for these reasons and others, it is essential that you appoint the Supervisor whoever that may be with a broad range of skills, experiences, ideas and historical  community  knowledge  to take an active role on  the Board of Supervisors hopefully beginning today. With  regard to my candidacy,  you have my resume with the skills and experience that I believe are a good match for the Board's needs. In short I'm an engineer for 35 years, technical, financial and business experience together with a long history of community service  who brings  an open mind  and an engineer's discipline to problem solving and management. In Lake Ashton I served three years  on the architectural  review community.   Since coming to Lake Ashton in 2012, I have taken a keen interest in the affairs of our community on many  diverse  issues.  I'm not a one issue candidate. I would like to think  that my comments  and questions  during the public comment portion of meetings that occasionally aided the community as well as given you a chance to know who I am and the kind of Supervisor I might be. I also, as to why you might choose me as opposed to other candidates would be along with the experience in Lake Ashton, I believe I bring the right mix of qualities  and new  ideas that  the Board needs to address the important issues facing us. I also believe that I have an unusual respect and good working relationship  with  several  of the COD Supervisors  that is necessary to get the golf course deal done with acceptable terms to us. That means no acquisition to our COD beyond normal closing and due diligence expenses that we choose to incur. Ongoing expenses should be limited to maintaining the golf cart paths and ponds that you see are an issue for the benefit of all, guaranteed deeded or easement access to  all residents. Thank you for considering me as a candidate.
Mr. d'Adesky: Thank you.
Ms. Burns: Do you have any more public comments? Mr. Costello: Yes I have one more. Larry Sims.
Mr. Sims: Good Morning. 4169 Stone Creek Loop, Lake Wales. I came in this morning to talk  about two issues.  One, the appointment  of the Supervisor.  With regard  to that, I am asking you to appoint someone who will vote to combine the East and West CDDs and bring this community together. The savings for this combination, security services, association management and other activities is significant. I heard numbers

anywhere between $100,000 and $500,000 but I don't know what it is. I'm sure you probably do. All I want to say is while I know that there is differences between some of you folks up here and the West COD Board, I don't think the rest of the community shares most of those differences. We all just want to be one community. By the way, people don't know there is a petition in the back of the room to combine the two CDDs and I would recommend that everybody go back and sign that. Second, with regard to the golf course, a couple people have already said what I was planning to say, but first of all, I was really shocked and many others were when this Board a couple months ago voted to walk away from further discussions on the golf course and to cancel the interlocal agreement with the West Board. This was done with no warning and no discussion with the West Board. The West Board evidently has decided to go ahead on its own with an acquisition. This will lead to further divisions and distrust between the two Boards and further divide our community. It is amazing to me that supposedly intelligent people on these two Boards can't agree on whether this is a good deal or not. The only numbers you need which was pointed out earlier you got from the professional people who paid a lot of money to tell us how much it is going to cost to run this golf course. We know how many members we have. We know what the revenue is in the Eagles Nest and the Pro Shop. Crunch the numbers and decide if it is a good deal. If is not then get together with the West, convince them it is not a good deal and walk away from it. If it is a good deal, then let's get together. Heal all the differences between these two Boards and go together as one community. If we don't do this and the West ends up buying this thing on their own and they are responsible for it, this community is going to be forever divided. I wouldn't want the responsibly for that. I hope you folks don't either. Maybe this thing is beyond repair at this point. It wouldn't surprise me, but if it is not, I hope you can come up with some way to heal the community and bring this thing together. Just before I go I have one question. What is the number? What is the worst case of how much it would cost per household if everything was on the negative side, how much is the worst case it would cost every household if we acquire this golf course?
Mr. Deane: We have no idea.
Mr. Sims: We spent over $100,000 on reports and months and we don't have an answer to that simple  question?   I'm really disappointed.	Thank you.

Mr. Costello: I have no more requests.

FOURTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes of the
September 16, 2019 meeting
Mr. Costello: We have the approval of the minutes of the September 16, 2019 meeting.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Engineers Report
Mr. Malave: Good morning. I have a couple of things. One, we have been working on the Dunmore outfall pipe system, working on getting one, our permits with S.W.F.W.M.D. We basically have talked to them trying to see how we can get this done with the least amount of permitting efforts. They have requested us to provide a letter of MOT, which requires an application which we have submitted with our drawings.  The  ones that we have signed we can submit that. I also have received some other options  that we want to look at trying to reduce some of the efforts of the engineering construction part of that aspect and third, we are working with our attorney to try and get the easements necessary for being able to have that pipe in that area as it is part of the main pipe coming in on golf course property.  Once we have the easements  secure we will be able to try  and get into that level of being able to authorize our contractor with some of the changes we have made. At the same time also trying to get the letter from the District to say it is approved. With that I will open it for any questions you have on that 'subject. Bob and I have talked about some options. We are going to go back and see how the calculations work for that.
Mr. Plummer: Thanks for discussing those .other options with me and  the hydraulics of how that water is going to get away and would not get away. I think we both have a little better understanding about where each one of us was thinking there. I think that going back and looking at a couple of those options may make a significant difference in the cost when we do that.
Mr. Malave: Two things we are trying to achieve just so everybody  has a better  idea is that if we could reduce the easement needed from the golf course or any work in

there and second minimizing some of the work, any effort to reduce the cost instead of trying to get up there to save time. Those are the two objectives we are trying to achieve here in being able to install this pipe system. The second issue that I have, South West Florida Water Management District has a requirement on all our permits for our storm water permit ponds and lakes and it requires that we do an inspection every seven years. This inspection is due a final report by December of the year. We have coordinated with Matt and Christine on getting our staff out there to start walking every single pond like we have done in previous years. We will create a report that shows how each outfall structure, how each pond is currently existing and then based on that report we will be able to see what any maintenance issues that are required. Then we will be able to do one form which is all they require that says that the system is operating as per our permits. We will be doing that over the next two months. The person that we had just got married so that is why she hasn't started it yet. She is back from her honeymoon next week so hopefully this is a nice surprise for her. She has done it before so she knows the area very well. We are working with the District on other options on getting costs. We have also looked at some of the roadway issues that are out there and inspecting those. Just opening it up if you have any other questions.
Mr. Costello: Litchfield, we were pumping water out of there. Now we went down and took a look at it. Is there any way that we can simply increase the pitch coming out towards either road in order to alleviate the problems that we have there?
Mr. Malave: I don't see any options to be able to do that because it is just difficult. We did provide two options on the being able to put a final structure there. It is just so expensive. Other than grading the slope and having the curb is not really going to effect it because the elevations are just so tight. Right now the water is where it needs to be and it has been as you can tell. We are having a very wet year. It has never happened before. I think you just need to watch it over the next year and see how it works and fluctuates itself. One other option that we talked to Dealtec about over time, fine silk soil kind of covers the bottom of a pond. One option that they had suggested and could be done is you do a scraping of the bottom to kind of get some of that soil mixed a little bit and exposed to the better percolating soil trying to get that silk out. Again it is a major operation and probably the outfall pipes are probably cheaper than doing that. There are

October 21, 2019	Lake Ashton CDD

two ponds and they are pretty large. There is just no other way to try to reduce the slopes and the curb to be able to get it to an elevation where it works.
Mr. Deane: Rey, the report on the ponds, is that all ponds on our development?
Mr. Malave: All ponds in the development which are under the permit. It does include some of those in the golf course. Yes, it includes all of them. That is correct.
Mr. Deane: Then we will know what has to be done to all of the ponds including the one that Margo is speaking about correct?
Mr. Malave: That is correct.
Mr. Deane: That is what I wanted to find out.
Mr. Malave: I will make sure she pays special attention to the ones on the north that are not being maintained as well.
Mr. Deane: There is more than one but that one is in bad shape and it is the one that people see when you come into the development.
Mr. Malave: Correct.
Mr. Costello: To clear it up legally other than the ponds that are within Lake Wales we normally take care of. Golf course ponds,  legally  we cannot do anything with them,  am I right or wrong?
Mr. d'Adesky: To the extent that the ponds are part of our stormwater system we can service them for stormwater purposes only for the scope of the permit.
Mr. Costello: I am talking about bringing in Applied Aquatics to enhance the look of it, legally we can't do that.
Mr. Malave: All those things are doable under our current permits including mowing of the side slopes. The key element that's crucial is the maintaining of the pipes coming in and the pipes that control the water going out.
Mr. d'Adesky: To the extent a lot of it for example is private property. We can't be trespassing on that private property and also expending public funds on private property. We are prohibited from doing that.
Mr. Costello: So, what are you saying? This is what I'm saying.
Mr. Malave: There are easements on all the ponds. As long as you stay within  those easements, that is all we can do any work. Anything outside of that is private. We cannot do that.

Mr. Costello: I realize  that on your part but what I am saying  is the  one woman, Ms. Stevens I think her name was, she came up and she has a legitimate gripe. I live behind one of the waterways.  The only  thing being  is the fact that people  have to come to a realization that legally we cannot fund the cleaning up of these waterways.
Mr. d'Adesky: The esthetics what you are seeing, the landscaping which  is the most esthetic part is the part that is typically under private control. The stormwater, it is harder to see that visually then the part that is under private control.
Mr. Costello: Anything else?
Mr. Malave: That is all I have. See you all next month.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
Consideration on Appointing a Supervisor to Vacant Board Seat #4
Residents who Submitted letters of interest: Harry Krumrie, Elizabeth Leigh, Carol Pontious, Steve Realmuto, George Rogers, Trish Safer, Warren Turner, Jack Van Sickle
Ms. Burns: Do you want me to give an overview of the process just so everybody knows how this will work. This vacant Board seat has a term that is up in November 2022. The person that is appointed to this would serve through the rest of that term. We had eight people who were eligible submit. The names you can see are listed on your agenda. All of them submitted either a resume or some sort of letter of interest or both. The Board has had those for about ten days so they have had the opportunity to review those. It will be up to the Board if you want to allow for further time or ask questions. If you want to just go off the written statements and resumes that were submitted that will be up to you. Once we go through whatever process you would like, how it will work is that we open for nominations. So, let's say one Supervisor wants to nominate Jane Doe and then the next person wants to nominate John Doe, we would then take a vote in the order in which they were nominated. We may only have one person nominated. We may have up to four nominated should all four of you like to nominate somebody. Once we go down and vote in the order in which they were nominated you are looking for the first person to get three votes. The first person who gets nominated gets three votes, that is it, they take the seat. If you say nominated John Doe and he is the second person on the list you would want to vote no on the first person in order to vote yes on the second person. Does that make sense everybody?

Mr. Ference: Does the nomination require a second?
Ms. Burns: No, we just open the floor for nominations. If all four of you essentially wanted to nominate somebody you could. If nobody gets three votes, the seat remains vacant until such time somebody obtains three votes. If there is a two - two tie today, it is possible that we don't appoint that seat.
Mr. d'Adesky: It is unfortunate of course we can't do a secret ballot because this is a public forum. Sunshine Law it all has to be out. Unfortunately that is the process we have to follow. You need to have a majority. It needs to pass just like a motion would pass.
Mr. Costello: Does any Supervisor have a thing that they want to do?  Do we want to ask questions or just have them give statements?
Mr. d'Adesky: It might be prudent to open it up. We had one candidate that spoke so I would be prudent to open it up. Give them a set amount of time. Two or three minutes to anyone else that would like to come up and speak if they so choose to do so.
Mr. Costello: Ok I'm going to go in the order they are on this sheet. Mr. d'Adesky: What amount of minutes? Two or three?
Mr. Costello: Three.
Ms. Burns: Just a note to everyone. It is not a requirement that you be here today in order to be appointed. You can appoint someone who isn't necessarily here as well.
Mr. Harry Krumrie: Good morning. I live at 2311 Ashton Club Drive. I know most of you. I think I know all of you. I have been here since 2005. I have been here as long as most people have been. Last November I ran for Seat #4. It certainly if anything, it proved that I have a large community backing for this position. There was over some 300 votes for me in that election. The other things, you do have my resume and I have certainly offered myself to each of you individually trying to get together and see if you had any questions or anything like that so I think you already know me. With me you are going to get somebody who is very visible in the community. I'm at that restaurant a lot. I'm at the Eagles Nest a lot. I'm on the golf course a lot. I'm just in the community.  I'm a handshaker. I want to meet new people. You will see me always. If I were to get on the Board, I'm looking at something like an open forum on Monday mornings after coffee once a month so people can come over and ask questions. As far as my background goes, I was chief financial officer of a small community hospital for twenty something

years. I had a position similar to that before that.  Basically  everything  I dealt with is to see it forward so everything would come before the Board. I have also served on other Boards,  lots  of other Boards.	I  served  on  golf course Boards.	I have served for the Salvation  Army.    I'm community oriented.	I  will  serve you well.		I will be honest, and trustworthy. I communicate well. I'm opened minded and I  have  a  lot  of fresh  ideas. hope you vote for me.
Mr. Costello: Thank you. Elizabeth Lee.
Ms. Burns: She emailed me and said she wasn't able to be here today. Mr. Costello: Carol Pontious.
Ms. Pontious: Good morning. I am Carol Pontious. I live at 4179 Aberdeen Lane and I have been  here since January  of 2005.  While here I have already  served  8 years in this seat on this Board. I just think it is really important to preserve the integrity of the community, the beauty of the situation and to make decisions that are the best for all people involved. We all have  specialty  interests  but when  we make decisions  we need to make them for all 950 residents  of Lake Ashton East.   I worked with everyone but Bob. I have enjoyed my time on the Board and if you feel that I can be a benefit to you I would be happy to serve. Thank you.
Mr. Costello: Thank you. Steve Realmuto. Mr. Realmuto: I said my piece thank you. Mr. Costello: George Rogers.
Mr. Rogers: First let me say I'm gratified you had such great candidates for appointment here. I know each of them would do an excellent job on the Board. I'm running because I think I have some unique qualifications which might be helpful in the most severe problem I think the community is facing and that is dealing with the golf course acquisition. Regardless of what the Winter Haven Board does I wish them the best of luck with their contract that they are proceeding with, however I do think that in my opinion there is going to be a disaster coming and sooner or later this Board and this community is going to have to deal with it and come up with some good solutions. I have been a trial attorney for 45 years. People only come to me when in fact there is an insurance, a corporation that says we are not going to pay you under the facts that we have here, you are not going to honor this contract or if you are a government agency we

are going to prosecute you. If you go ahead and find the issue just under those facts you are going to lose. As an attorney I'm not the greatest orator. I'm not the greatest legal scholar but what I do and the reason I won over the 45 years the vast majority of my cases is because I'm involved with due diligence. I go on out and hit the street and do my own investigation to find the facts that will assist my client in that case. When I do you never know exactly what you are going to find but when you do a thorough investigation you always come up with something that helps you win and change the argument. Now what has been presented too before the material that you are getting from Maxwell is crap. Let's face it. That survey that was done by your professional golf course analysis is all based on fantasy and hopeful figures. There is really nothing that backs it up in the way offacts. We need facts in this case. We need to have due diligence. We need to get it done over the next two or three years to work up a viable solution to what is going to happen. I think I can help the Board that way so I hope you consider me. Thank you.
Mr. Costello: Thank you.	Trish Safer.
Ms. Safer: I live at 3754 Litchfield Loop. As you can see from my resume my background is strong in finance.  If no one  on this panel knows  that cost per household  for requiring and maintaining the golf course from all the information that you received so far, then you definitely need my expertise on this Board. I have worked in property management negotiating with residents, vendors and developers. I have developed and managed budgets and budget variances for many properties. I have worked with developers who are starting CDD's, who are turning over CDD's and who are not  in  control of the CDD's. I have also been on the Board of Directors of more than one community. I would add to this Board a new fresh female perspective and with practical purpose. Thank you.
Mr. Costello: Thank you. Warren Turner. Not here apparently. Jack Van Sickle. Mr. Van Sickle: 4060 Ashton Club Drive, Lakes Wales. I know the commissioners.
I have worked with several of them on different things. My resume states it all but for the residents and the office I will give a little background that they may not be aware of. We  got here in March of 2005 and I got involved with the transition of the HOA from the developer  to the  citizens.   I  spent six years  in the HOA  doing  work.  I set up the original

filing  system.  When I became secretary,  I was handed  a box and that was their records. I went through and found the documents that we needed to keep for a period of time. Of course that changed as they started developing  and getting  computers.  There was a lot of work  there.  Other  things that are important to the people  are not very visible. In 2007  I was on the city commission and the next year I was elected Mayor. During that time I managed to get the funding for the temporary fire station down  the road.  When I got on the Board I found out if there was a fire, the firemen could come to your house but could not come in to rescue you because they did not have three people  on that truck.  They  had to wait for the second truck before they could enter your home. I got that money to support this community. Other things very early on and people that were here in 2003, 2004 and 2005 know we had a problem with water.  We were  on  Lake Wales end,  it is not a loop system. Engineers will understand that. We had a tendency at 7:00 in the morning everybody taking showers, you had to run around to get wet in your own shower.  I worked with an issue that Lake Wales and Winter Haven and got them to agree to install an interconnect between the two communities which is over by the storage area. That saved this community in 2008 or 2009 when the 8 inch pipe coming into the Lake Wales side got hit by lightning, we managed to stop the water coming from Lake Wales and the pressure change allowed the Winter Haven water to feed into this community  to keep  it up, not high pressure but we had water until that pipe was fixed. Other things  that  I worked on, I was on a lot of Boards at the county level and also intercounty.  On the  county level I was in the original community that determined where Polk County road was going to go. Everybody knows it changed and came very close. When I was on that community it was a mile further south. It would stay away from the back south of Lake Ashton.  Those are things that I have been involved with.   I am an introvert.   I am not into a lot of things. I have also been giving this Board different things and recently two of my ideas have been worked on. Mr. Plummer took over security.  He came up with a plan. I had given  him some initial information.  It was not what  I thought  was going to come out of it but it was done. Solar, I have been pushing for years.  That is currently being looked at. I had that information knowledge and concerns for this community. I also understand working in communities because if you look at my background I ran communities developing electronic warfare equipment where I had engineers, logistics, software

people and my job was to ensure we didn't go over budget and keep these guys from killing each other because they all wanted to be high end and pocket the money. I know how to work with people. I listen. That is one thing that I do. When I ran committees when I was Mayor, I had all the Supervisors speak first because frankly some of those guys come up with good ideas and I like to join them when it is a good idea and maybe add something to it to make it a great idea. In the past I see that we are not doing as well as we possibly could, but it is something that is easy to change. I'm looking forward to serving you.
Mr. Costello: Thank you.
Ms. Burns: Do you want me to take over this portion to do nominations? I don't know if the Board wants to have any discussion first or if you want to go ahead and open for nominations?
Mr. Costello: Does anybody have any comments?
Ms. Burns: Nope, then we would open up for nominations if anybody has one feel free to throw out a name.
Mr. Deane: I would like to nominate Carol Pontious. She has been here. She knows what we are doing. She knows it well.
Mr. Plummer: I would like to nominate Harry Krumrie.
Ms. Burns: Anybody have any other nominations? Now we will go on and vote. We will vote in the order in which the nominations were made so the first person is Carol Pontious.
Mr. Plummer: Explain the vote again, how it works.
Ms. Burns: We are going to go in order. Your only options are yes or no. So if you essentially wanted to vote for the second person, you would vote no on the first. If you are in favor of the first person, the first person to get three votes is named. If the first person gets three votes off the back there is no vote on the second person. Does that make sense? Is everybody on the same page? We then begin the vote for Carol Pontious. All in favor. Can we do hands so we can see? Two for and two opposed. We will now go onto Harry Krumrie. All in favor? Three and all opposed one. Mr. Krumrie.
Mr. Costello: Congratulations.

Ms. Burns: Can you come up? Thank you to everybody who submitted and had interest. We know it is a tough decision for the Board.

Oath of Office for Newly Appointed Supervisor
Election of Officers
Ms. Burns: We are going to go ahead and swear you in. We will do a brief Sunshine outline, but we will do more detail in the end, as well.
Ms. Burns, being a Notary Public of the State of Florida administered the oath of office to Mr. Krumrie, and briefly went over the documents provided in the new Board member packet. The signed oath will become part of the public record.
Mr. d'Adesky: We will do a run through with you Supervisor Krumrie of public records and Sunshine Law afterwards so you are up-to-date. We will also send you material on those laws.
Mr. Costello: Ok, that wasn't as painful as I thought it would be.

SEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	New	Business	and	Supervisor
Requests
Discussion Regarding Cooperation with Lake Ashton II CDD for Acquisition of the Golf Course(requested by Supervisor Costello) and Consideration of lnterlocal Agreement between Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II CDD Regarding the Acquisition, Operation and  Maintenance of the Golf Club
Mr. Costello: The first one is discussion regarding cooperation with Lake Ashton II COD for acquisition of the golf course. I think at this time we would want to have the attorney for them and I don't know if we want to have some of their membership.
Mr. d'Adesky: I would limit it to staff because once you open it up to anybody else you have to open up public comment to everybody.
Ms. Sandy: First I just wanted to thank the Board for adding us onto your agenda today. I know it wasn't originally on it so I appreciate the Board taking it up and also allowing me to come here and speak to you today. I know I have met many of you but just for the record, my name is Sarah Sandy and I am with the law firm of Hopping, Green and Sams and we represent the Lake Ashton II Community Development District. I know this is a discussion regarding the cooperation of the Districts for the acquisition of the golf course. I know that there has been a long history here and know this Board is well versed in that as well as most of the audience. I don't want to go into the history. I want to focus

on where we are at this time and what our paths are moving forward. Currently, and I think this Board is pretty well informed on the current purchase and sale agreement that Lake Ashton II has but to give a little summary for the audience and to get everybody up to date I will do a quick summary to where we are at this time. The Lake Ashton II Board has a purchase and sale agreement in place with the sellers. We have our schedule for a due diligence period that expires on November 15 and a closing date of December 14, both of this year. As we are quickly moving towards those dates we are continuing with the due diligence that remains at this time. Now the current purchase and sale agreement in contrast to the one previously has a little bit of flexibility built in because the Board knew that they had a couple of options in front of them and they wanted to leave those options open until the point in time that we had to make a decision on which way to go. We have gotten to that point. We are at that point in time where we need to decide which path we are taking. The two main paths are one, the one that I'm here to talk to you about today, the interlocal option and that is the option that would consider cooperation between the two Districts with an interlocal agreement under which the Lake Ashton II Board would move forward with acquiring the entire golf course at this closing this year in December. The second option which I will refer to as the developer option would entail the Lake Ashton II District acquiring the West course at the December closing and then continuing to work with the developer for the next, at least five years on the ownership and management of the East course within the Lake Ashton boundaries. Those are the two options that we have in front of us today. As I said, the one that I'm here to discuss with you is the interlocal option. I believe in front of you, you have a copy of an interlocal agreement as well as a one page summary of the main business points out of that interlocal agreement. This option I feel I can firmly say is the preferred option of the Lake Ashton II Board. I think that is supported by the fact that they have adopted this interlocal in substantial form at their meeting last week. Additionally our feeling is that this option provides and addresses the concerns of both Districts that have been expressed up to this stage. Lake Ashton II is asking for what they think is the minimal cooperation that they need from Lake Ashton I. It addresses the concern, I think it also addresses one of the main concerns of this Board which was insulating it from financial risk. There is certainly risk associated with acquiring and managing a golf course. This interlocal agreement addresses that specifically. It also

addresses the pathway issue and equal use rights to the golf course, it provides that under this interlocal agreement. Lake Ashton I residents or landowners would receive not only equal and access rights to the golf courses and the golf course amenities, but there would also be a non-exclusive easement in favor of the Lake Ashton I residents or landowners over the pathways within the golf courses. I think the main item that this interlocal agreement, and this option really does, is that it provides for as I said with closing the entire golf course at this December date of this year which would allow for getting the golf course out of the hands and control of the developer and into the hands of the community. It would put that ownership and management back into this community and take out the developer at a sooner date rather than protracting out that time line over a longer period. If you don't mind, I'm going to go into the specific points on that sheet that you have in front of you to provide you with just a little more detail on the actual point of the interlocal agreement. First and foremost, the benefits that the interlocal agreement provides to Lake Ashton I first as I said, it provides there is no financial risk or responsibility for Lake Ashton I in conjunction with the acquisition of the golf course. There is no obligation of this District to support any of those or provide for any of those costs. Additionally the same goes for the ownership, maintenance, management, repair and replacement of the golf course provided that Lake Ashton I would have no financial obligation in regards to that. Second as I said, previously it would provide that Lake Ashton I residents or landowners would have equal use rights to the golf course amenities and thirdly it provides that non-exclusive perpetual easement of the pathways with both golf courses for all landowners and residents of Lake Ashton I. In return for that, what Lake Ashton II is asking of Lake Ashton I is to agree to support a request by Lake Ashton II to get recreational powers from the City of Lake Wales. That is something that we will proceed forward with rather quickly. The other item is to support Lake Ashton ll's efforts to bring holes 14, 15 and 16 of the West course into Lake Ashton ll's boundaries. I want to specifically mention that does not include any of the residential lots that are adjacent to those holes, it is exclusively those three golf course holes. There may have been some miscommunication about that just to emphasize that to the Board. Third, it also provides that it asks that Lake Ashton I cooperate in establishing an equal user rate for all residents and non-residents of the golf course so for all golfers, golfers using the golf course in Lake Ashton I boundaries. Those

are the main requests from this District under the interlocal agreement. There are a few additional provisions that the interlocal agreement provides, specifically these are laying out the potential for future discussions of items that I heard earlier today. Specifically provides that Lake Ashton I could make a proposal to Lake Ashton II for the purchase of all or a portion of the golf course and Lake Ashton II would have to consider that proposal within 60 days of it being made. The agreement states that neither District is obligated to make or accept that proposal but it lays out some perimeters for that. It additionally provides that there would be future discussions on Lake Ashton I ownership and maintenance of the pathways and ponds within your boundaries. Again, a future discussion that the Boards could have over that would look like and the structure of such in the future. The third, it provides and discusses is the attention to having future discussion on the ownership and maintenance of certain common areas within Lake Ashton l's boundaries that are not essential to both golf course operations. I think specifically here we are thinking about there was a discussion of the dog park that the Board had wanted to look at developing. The third item that it discusses is future discussions over easements that this Board might need on the Lake Ashton I golf course, specifically what was in mind here was the drainage easement that is needed. In short that is the interlocal agreement in a nutshell. As you can see in contrast to our prior interlocal agreement, it is much shorter. It tries to clearly lay out the obligations that are and are not of each of the Districts. I think it addresses as I said both concerns of the Districts. Under this, Lake Ashton II will move forward with the entire acquisition which will save costs in terms of acquisition costs and extending that out over multiple years. It will also allow us to as I said, remove the developer from the equation and allow these two Boards to work together instead of this one having to work with the developer on the various items that come up for the lands within your boundaries. It provides the ability for this community to own and maintain the golf course and make sure as everybody is interested in protecting your home values, protecting what is in your community. That said, I'm willing to answer any questions that this Board may have.
Mr. Plummer:	As I understand  it  and correct  me  if I  am wrong,  there are two
proposals from Lake Ashton II. The first one is purchasing the land in the West and working with the developer as far as golf course operations goes and that is agreement I.

Ms. Sandy: Yes, the developer option as I was talking about.
Mr. Plummer: Agreement 2, and they have the option to pick either one that they would like to go with is involving Lake Ashton I as far as ownership of the land goes. Am I correct there?
Ms. Sandy: Under the purchase and sale agreement? Not specifically in that way. The flexibility is built in so that Lake Ashton II can name a grantee for the land but it doesn't specifically name who that would be.
Mr. Plummer: And I think I understand why that is.
Ms. Sandy: The developer continued negotiations on not making the purchase and sale agreement contingent on Lake Ashton l's participation in the PSA.
Mr. Plummer: The next question that I have is if option 1 is the one they go with and they work with the owner, the owner then still would be responsible for ponds etc. on the East course.
Ms. Sandy: That would fall under a mandatory agreement between the developer and Lake Ashton II. The responsibilities would be likely shifting to Lake Ashton II but the developer would still remain as the likely for now, the owner of the property and they would still have a say in the management and maintenance.
Mr. Plummer: So if we wanted to address the concerns that were spoken here earlier about some of our ponds and things on the East, this may be a legal question as well, the question is for us to ensure that the ponds are taken care of appropriately for all the residents on this side, us having some ownership in the land is the best way to do that.
Ms. Sandy: Correct and I will say under this interlocal agreement Lake Ashton I would not be getting ownership at this point in time of the pathways and ponds but that is something that we have baked into the agreement in terms of our intention and I believe our intention for this Board and correct me if I'm wrong there is to eventually have ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the pathways and ponds. We would have that discussion at a future time. The reason it is not in this interlocal agreement right now is as I said we are under a time crunch and we have to pick a path toward hardening. Unless there is a concrete proposal that provides a fair and equitable compensation which is something that I believe will require further negotiations and details that I don't know if we have the time to build it into an interlocal agreement right now. What I would say is

the idea is that as I said, that the acquisition of the golf courses would be all of the land by Lake Ashton 11 in December so they would be coming out of the hands of the developer into Lake Ashton 11 with the idea that the landowners or residents are getting rights to those pathways and the negotiations at that point in time would be with Lake Ashton II, it would not be with the developer. The idea is that we would continue the negotiations on how we could eventually transfer ownership to this Board and that would be the intention. There would have to be a lot more details worked out, I just don't think we have to work out in this interlocal agreement.
Mr. Ference: How does our attorney and what does our legal team think about this proposition and proposal?	We have  heard from their  point of view.	What would our attorney's think? What do you think about what has been said here from Lake Ashton II?
Ms. Carpenter: We are somewhat in the same position you are in that we received this when you did it last week. We have a couple questions again we have not researched or spent a lot of time as we weren't directed to do so. We have a couple questions on the acquisition and the ability of Lake Ashton II to acquire in this time period because they are going to be operating outside their boundaries and technology they have to get that permission from a local government if it is possible. We have not seen that happen before. That might be a new question of law whether you can get powers outside. Generally you need an interlocal agreement or some kind of agreement to be able to operate outside your boundaries. That is just one issue we have out there. Overall I think from the District's perspective if the District wants to own the land within their boundaries, acquiring the land would certainly give the District more bargaining power from a business standpoint than having Lake Ashton II and then be at the mercy of the other party. I'm not saying that antagonistically but in any business transaction if they own it all and Lake Ashton I wants to do anything whether it be maintain ponds, grant ownership of ponds, it is much tougher if they already have legal rights to it. The District has a couple of options whether it would be a part of the land and then negotiate how to do it or I guess let them acquire it if they can legally do so.
Mr. Ference: Your point of view then is this is not a time for us to go forward because you have some serious questions about the proposal and have not had a chance to research it and see if it is in our best interest as well.

Ms. Carpenter: I'm not sure if they can go forward under this given the time constraints. Perhaps they can go to Lake Wales and get that legal ability. I'm not sure if that gives them enough time.
Mr. Ference: From our point of view what should our action be?
Ms. Sandy: The interlocal agreement does not ask this Board to make that legal judgement. That is for our Board to move forward on in terms of the right powers requesting that from the city. We are not asking this Board to go to the city to request recreational powers.
Mr. Deane: I have already been to the city, they are not giving up any property.
Mr. Costello: As time goes on let's face it, these Boards are going to change. In the future we could get a Board in there who makes a decision that jeopardizes or hurts us in one way or another. If we give them ownership of the land, believe me I don't want to be any kind of an obstructionist in this, but on the same token I want to protect what we have. I want to see it move forward, and I hope that they do well with it, but on the same token I don't want to do it at the risk that we are going to end up with bills that we shouldn't be paying.
Mr. d'Adesky: Mike, there are several questions. That is one question. Obviously and Jan brought it up, we would have to contract our boundary allowing them to expand our boundary. It is not much a novel situation where one entity is trying to go and acquire recreational powers within the territory or another COD. We haven't seen it anywhere else. We are not sure whether it is even within the perimeters of Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. We might require an opinion of the Attorney General which sometimes can take a couple months to generate but beyond that there are other considerations about that that are not baked into this such as the bond debt. That is a significant financial burden that does need to be retired on that land before it could be acquired by another entity, especially a public entity. That is another consideration that would be a financial consideration that this Board would have to factor in to any analysis and is not addressed in the current interlocal agreement. Clearly as mentioned by the counsel for Lake Ashton II as well as others on the Board the business term whereby the COD 11 would have the responsivity to consider a proposal but no requirement to actually go forward with any proposal under any condition is obviously something that this District, even if they wanted
October 21, 2019	lake Ashton CDD

to consider an interlocal agreement might want to sit down and negotiate or further flush out that system such that it might be a little bit more collaborative then one sided. Those are just considerations from the legal standpoint.
Mr. Ference: We will feel a lot better if you tell us that what they are proposing is also in our best interest.
Mr. d'Adesky: That is a business decision.	We can't give a business decision.
Ms. Sandy: The debt portion is not addressed in the interlocal because that is not an obligation of this Board. That is not something that this Board would have to handle. That is part of the acquisition from the developer  and  if the land was acquired  and it has a debt lien on it, then yes that would be retired as part of the acquisition  but  it is part of the interlocal agreement because this Board is not acquiring property as clearly stated as possible. This Board does not have any financial obligations.
Mr. Plummer: Frankly the PSA has, I have read looks like it is very similar to the one that was combined as far as the dollars and cents which does include the bond debt. There is no liability for that back to Lake Ashton I under that PSA.
Ms. Sandy: I want to be very clear  about  that.  I don't know if I miscommunicated to that but under this interlocal agreement and the acquisition option that we are talking about, Lake Ashton I would have no financial obligations under the acquisition portion or the ownership or management portion of the golf course.
Mr. Costello: Have we paid for cart paths in the past? Ms. Burns: No.
Mr. Costello: And we are being asked to in this?
Ms. Sandy: No. Again the easement would give the landowners and residents in Lake Ashton I the rights to use the pathways but there is no financial obligation. Lake Ashton II would still be paying for the maintenance of them.
Mr. Costello: Ok.
Ms. Sandy: There would be no maintenance obligations on Lake Ashton I. There would be no financial obligation. Like I said, this interlocal agreement is really the minimal cooperation that we would be looking for. There are no financial obligations or management responsibilities with this. It just provides equal use rights. It provides an easement to your landowners and residents and in return it asks for setting the resident

and non-resident golfer user rate in Lake Ashton I golf course. It asks for your support of our request in the city but not actually this Board requesting from the city any rec powers. Then it also asks for your support of the boundary. Again you would have to incur costs to petition for the boundary amendment. We would not ask this District to be the petitioner at all. It would likely be a resolution of support. The other thing I do want to point out about this in regards to the pathways. I know we did discuss and like I said it is our understanding that it is this Board's intention to eventually own and maintain them. We fully support that, but it is not in this interlocal as we frankly don't have the time to work out those kinds of details that I know we are going to want a back and forth on so we have laid out the intention here to say eventually it is our understanding the Lake Ashton I would like to own those and maintain those and to eventually have that discussion. In order to do that we first have to get ownership of the property. If we don't move forward with this, we are going to be looking at the developer to own anything in the property in Lake Ashton I. If you want to get better ownership or maintenance responsibilities for the pathways and ponds, you are practically looking at discussing that with the developer at this point in time as opposed to Lake Ashton II. That is really the main difference there. From my point of view, Lake Ashton II, these are your neighbors. I know the Boards have had their differences at times but that is somebody who has the same point of view as those on this Board, somebody who has the same interest in this community. Protecting your home value and protecting your neighbor providing for your community.
Mr. Plummer: Am I correct that Lake Ashton I owns the land in their District, then
agrees to allow Lake Ashton II to operate the golf course, there is no reason to go to the city of Lake Wales and ask for the rights that they were asking for?
Ms. Sandy: I think we would still pursue asking for those recreation powers because that would give Lake Ashton II operating the golf course. Under 190 if you are going to have a recreational amenity such as this building right here, then either as part of the establishment or after that you have to request from the local government recreational power. 190 allows Districts to own amenities and improvements outside of its boundaries so I know as Jan and Andrew said, I have not personally done it but our former person has done CDDs so I believe it is possible that it has happened before. I'm not just one that has done it myself.

Mr. Costello: On page 5 - 6.5, it says the Districts agree that it makes sense ultimately for each District to maintain, repair and replace the pathways and ponds.
Ms. Sandy: Correct, that is the intention to eventually have that discussion. The reason again that we were providing for the intention in here is to show the good faith that we are recognizing the fact that Lake  Ashton  I would  like to eventually  do that but again it doesn't provide any specifics in here that those properties would go to Lake Ashton I because at this point in time we have not had the ability to work out those details.
Mr. Ference: Jan, is it in our best interest to do nothing?
Ms. Carpenter: I just want to point out that there is two provisions in the interlocal that jump out at us that the Board should  just look at carefully.  The first is the interlocal, the offers to purchase. If they purchase the property under this  interlocal,  any  proposal for this Board to buy it back from them,  they  have to consider,  but they don't  have to sell it to you. They can hold that up at any point or charge  whatever  price and I'm not sure  that is in your best interest.
Mr. Ference: You are telling us they are going to own the West golf course but the East golf course they are going to own but they don't have to sell that to us no matter if we want to buy it, is that what you are saying?
Ms. Carpenter: Correct. It says they have to consider it, but there is no obligation to accept any proposal.
Mr. Ference: They are going to own both golf courses. Even if we wanted to own our own golf course, they might deny our offer to buy it.
Ms. Carpenter: That is the way it is currently drafted. The other provision is section 6.2, by signing this you agree to reduce the size of this District by the three golf holes that would allow them to execute documents to change boundary amendments. I think it is those three golf holes. You are agreeing to reduce the size of your COD by those.
Mr. Ference: The more we say, the less it looks like this is not in our best interest from what I can see.
Ms. Sandy: It doesn't reduce, it allows us to petition the local governments to amend the boundaries. We have to go to the city of Lake Wales and Polk County.
Ms. Carpenter: Yes, but it requires this Board to cooperate with whatever Lake Ashton decides to do. That is just the way it is drafted. That doesn't give this Board any

discretion on if they choose to expand their boundary, you would have to cooperate and tell the city you are ok with it for the land that is described in exhibit C.
Mr. Ference: I don't like that potential for never being able to own our own golf course leaving that to the design of the West. I mean by definition we can offer to buy it and they can say no, we are not selling it to you, and then we will never have ownership of our own golf course.
Ms. Sandy: If I can just say one thing. Yes, you are correct and that is a provision within it and that is a good question. I think anybody who owns land would expect the right to be able to accept or not accept an offer. The same that Lake Ashton II could price gauge and charge, the contrast could be true if we're forced to take any offer. You could offer nothing.
Ms. Carpenter: There are ways to negotiate whether it is their cost plus or cost to put some reasonable standards in when you have an option to purchase. There are ways to build it into the contract that it will be their cost plus taxes. The cost over the years, inflation. There are certain ways you could draft it so there was some reasonableness put in there so you knew you could buy it at a cost that would be reasonable to the residents and equal to what the residents in West would be paying.
Mr. Ference: I like that. I that should be built into any agreement we enter into. Ms. Carpenter: I think the bigger picture for the Board is does the Board want to,
they have a contract where they could assign their portion of Lake Ashton I portion to purchase it so the Board could purchase under the same terms you looked at the contract before and then own it. Then you would have control over your destiny if that is what is going to happen or say no and then it would be very tough for them to purchase without the interlocal.
Mr. Ference: Can we ask you to respond to their presentation in their best interest and to do one in our best interest along the lines you just laid out so that we can hear you say what is best for us in this interlocal agreement?
Mr. Costello: One of the things is you are under a time restraint.
Ms. Sandy: Yes. As Jan was just saying, an offer to have this Board, the land being conveyed to this Board, I think anything short of a concrete proposal within the next day or two with very specific parameters and that would include a fair and equable cost,

pay to show some good faith for the cost that the Lake Ashton 11 have paid at this point. They have paid the due diligence cost, they have paid legal bills and they are moving forward paying acquisition costs. So short of something would have, I don't believe Lake Ashton 11 to make a profit but I think they would expect that if they are not going to own  the property that those costs would be covered by this Board. Anything short  of  a  concrete proposal with very specific parameters also with the cost associated  with it I  think is a non-starter and would force us to move forward with the developer option.
Mr. Costello: Quite honestly, I think this should be done at a joint meeting and I realize you are under a time restraint  but by the same token there is a lot and don't  get  me wrong, like I said I have no problem.  I know  you want to run a golf course.  What  I  am saying under a time restraint, even though this isn't really truly a long document,  it's like 8 pages, there is a lot involved in this here. Your people  have said quote  un quote, that they feel that it is best that the people of Lake Ashton dictate how this property  is going to go forward. We feel the same under our side also but the thing is this, here it is, like I say in as much as it is not a long document, it is a rather intense document.  There are things in here that quite honestly they are questionable. We don't know what the makeup of these Boards will be like, who knows maybe it will be one Board but by the same token we don't know what the makeup will be like of this Board.
Mr. Ference: How long will it take you Jan to answer these questions within the parameter of the timeline? Could we come up with a reasonable response that is in our favor as theirs is in their favor?
Ms. Carpenter: I think the Board needs to decide what it wants to do. We need the direction, does the Board want to acquire the property and lease it back to the West side? Does the Board not want to acquire property  and let them run it how they  want?  Come  up with terms to buy at some point.  There  is just so many  ambiguities  in this,  it's tough to say.
Mr. Costello: I don't want to give them a blank check, I'm sorry.
Mr. Ference: We do want to acquire the property. I think it has been obvious by what we have said about property values, etc. We don't want to go into hayfield so we do certainly want to own the property, but at any cost and not without conditions that favor the relationship between us as their proposal seems to favor the interest of the West.

Ms. Sandy: If I could just say one thing, I hear that obviously by the Board's past actions there is an interest in acquiring the golf course and protecting the home values. The flip side of that is the ownership and maintenance of a golf course has costs. It has a financial risk. The purpose of this document was to insulate and protect this District who did not want to take the financial risk with the prior purchase and sale agreement from that financial risk and keep it on Lake Ashton II which they are willing to take but it would allow us to work together on the continued operation of a golf course and remove the developer from the community. Currently now, yes, it doesn't provide that would have to accept any proposal for the purchase of the golf course but the same thing applies to the developer. The developer does not have to accept Lake Ashton's proposal to purchase the golf course. Neither does any future owner. That is not built into this interlocal agreement, but we do not as I said, we are trying to move forward and we put together a document that we thought put the least amount of obligations and responsibilities on Lake Ashton I and left the remainder of the financial risk on Lake Ashton II.
Mr. Ference: Unless we are able to provide a document that says just as Jan has
pointed out, the sale to us can be with these and these conditions. We are just not going to be able to buy at any condition or any time, I don't like that at all. I think there should be some conditions that so that you do get your cost, you do get your taxes, etc. etc. as Jan pointed out so when we want to buy the property, it will be, oh never mind, we are not going to sell it no matter what. I think there should be a matter where we can eventually own our own golf course and I would like to see that written into this agreement. Can that be done Jan? It is not in there they don't have to accept any proposal we make. There should be a way that we can make a proposal that satisfies your legal obligation, your financial obligations where we can, is that possible?
Ms. Carpenter: What this is allowing them is to acquire the property very quickly under the old purchase and sale agreement that the Board turned down. If they acquire it under this, this Board does lose any bargaining position because it says that we will agree to contract the boundary, they are going to run it, we can buy our paths and ponds at some cost to be negotiated in the future, we can buy the property at some cost to be negotiated in the future. It is almost a little questionable to me how it really is an

agreement because we have sort of given up all the rights of the District. The assumption is it is a government and we will all be fair and it will be able to be resolved but it is not written in there now. It is tough to know what obligations you would be undertaking.
Mr. Ference: I think it is a mistake on our part to go forward not knowing what obligations we would be taking.
Ms. Carpenter: I'm not being negative at the idea because I understand the acquisition of the property is something both Board's desire to do, it is whether the Board wants to do it quickly under those terms. Then I would say if you want to do it, then I would recommend acquiring the property and then figure a ground lease for operations because I think this is tough to be cutting and pasting pieces of the Districts giving them a portion. How are they going to maintain the rest of it that they don't own? You would have no control over that.
Mr. Costello: What would be the latest time that you would have to have a decision by this Board?
Ms. Sandy: This week.
Mr. Costello: This is not a long document but there are things that I think everybody will agree that have to be looked at. The only thing we can do this week I think is instead of adjourning this meeting, we could maybe hold it open and maybe by the end of the week if you can come up with the changes in this document that would give us the protection that we feel we need, we could come in and vote on it as long as you people are in agreement with it.
Ms. Carpenter: Can I just ask the comment you had made is if the Board decided they want to go forward to purchase the sale it would be at a price in the contract plus costs. I suppose that should be presented to this Board too if there's two options they should know the cost of the second.
Mr. Ference: Amen.
Ms. Carpenter: Because that might be something they would prefer to do over entering to this kind of agreement. I just have concerns as to the management. What happens once you expand? What happens to the 18 holes that are left over, will they go to the COD because the Board no longer has control over those? I think that there is too many questions and I understand you had to put together something because you needed

the interlocal to go forward. I'm not sure how the Board can vote on something with this many openings in it.
Mr. Ference: How soon can you give us some answers to those questions? There are too many questions and not enough answers. How long would it take for you to provide them?
Ms. Carpenter: There are a lot of questions. I'm not sure I can give a potential. What sort of negotiation? Would it be the price that they paid plus their costs? How would we come up with the costs?
Mr. Ference: What is the normal management?
Ms. Carpenter: This is not normal. I'm not sure how you would lay out the management and what you would do long term once an expansion happens. Would you be able to acquire those 18 holes or are you going to be able to say yes or no what happens to them. For the folks that live on the golf course it would be tough to have Lake Ashton II on that property and not know what is going to happen to it? If this Board owns it, you could control what is going to be happening.
Ms. Sandy: Can I just say on behalf of the Lake Ashton II Board that they intend to operate this as a golf course and the only way to do that especially for one that we need to breakeven or make a profit to have golfers, and the way to do that is to maintain the golf course. At this point in time as long as they can continue to manage it as a golf course and cover the costs and through our due diligence have seen that we could eventually make a profit.
Mr. Costello: There are a lot of variables here though also. They could decide well we are going to shut holes down and have three nine hole golf courses which rumor out there has it that is what will happen. It is going to depend  on how quickly  they  can get  this into a positive setting financially.
Ms. Sandy: I don't think that situation currently is different with the developer. think they have made that same threat. The Lake Ashton II Board does have an interest in the community.
Mr. Costello: I don't doubt that and I think that quite honestly I give a lot of credit to them. I think personally we have had so many reports and so many numbers that personally I would have a problem deciding to do it, but by the same token they see

something apparently that we don't see and that is ok. People think in different manners. The only thing is we don't want to put ourselves in any jeopardy whatsoever that something is going to go array and we are going to come up spending a lot of money in order to fix it.
Ms. Sandy: I will defer to your counsel to advise you on that. Under this agreement there is intended to be no financial obligations on Lake Ashton I. I don't know what thoughts there are in terms of what eventual financial obligation there would be but that was the purpose in trying to address both District's concerns. Lake Ashton II wants to move forward. Lake Ashton I sees the value in owning the golf course and keeping it, maintaining to the value to this community but doesn't want the financial risk. This interlocal agreement is trying to marry those two ideas together to get this community to work together to accomplish that.
Mr. Costello: Personally I would hope that we are going to do everything we can in order to allow them to do whatever they want to do but in the meantime· we need protection.
Ms. Sandy: In any other scenario that would be an addition to us saying that in the future we would be required to sell the golf course and you don't know until you have a proposal in the future I would see it very hard to work in a proposal into the interlocal agreement a very specific proposal that Lake Ashton II would be required to accept in the future. On the boundary portion that is something that we are going to pursue. If that is the piece that makes this Board uncomfortable, I think that is something that we could probably end up taking out but in terms of requiring certain maintenance levels or requiring a certain proposal be accepted in the future, I just don't think that we have the time to purse up those details for this interlocal agreement for us to move forward. That would force us to move forward with the other option.
Mr. Plummer: Quite frankly this is my opinion, I'm not going to speak for the other Board members up here, but I don't have any problem with Lake Ashton II operating the golf course. I, like the rest of them here, I believe just want to make sure we own the land on our side and allow them to operate the golf course on our  land.  The reason behind  that is we have complaints of that with folks here this morning wanting us to take care of the ponds. If we own the lands we can take of the ponds. That is not a problem. We

had an issue with needing to run a drainage pipe through the golf course. If we own the golf course, we can handle that without  going to somebody  else for permits.  Those are  all options. The third part is the dog park that we would like to be put in has been held up because of the land acquisition. To me, what I'm saying is, if Lake Ashton II wants to run the golf course, then so be it. Do it.  We would  like to own the land on our  side  so that  we can work through these issues to deal with our residents.
Ms. Sandy: This interlocal agreement gives the option to work those out later. think that we are just hand-strung in terms of time because I do think that each of those items are going to require really specific details to be worked out and we just don't have the time to work them out on this. I think that is probably phase II of this agreement. They are  showing their intention.	They adopted this agreement in substantial form. Their intention to move forward with this and as it is stated in here, the intention to do almost all of those items as long as the proposal made in purchasing either the land on its side, purchasing the pathways and ponds on the easements required or the dog park, that those proposals re detailed and fair. We just don't have the time before the closing to do that. Again we still have the ability to negotiate and I think that is not a closed door in any means. This would allow us to have a more streamline simplified process and future negotiations on that. Without it we would move forward with the other option and it is going to be a longer timeline before that can happen.
Mr. Plummer: If you exercise Option 1, can we move right into negotiations to acquire the land at that point, what is the time ramifications there?
Ms. Sandy: We have the ability over the next five years to name who would be the grantee for the land so who the land would go to but the developer is still involved. They are involved with ownership, management and maintenance. They still have a say. It becomes a more nuance to complicate negotiations.
Mr. Plummer: You hit the nail on the head. The developer is still involved. If we want to take the issues that I talked about prior to this and have that control over that we need to work diligently to acquire the land and get that accomplished. I realize that there are parts of the interlocal that cause some legal issues in either direction but quite frankly it is like any other documents we start with what is presented on day one is never what you get on the last day.

Ms. Sandy: I do believe that is very true, except for the fact that the Board has adopted it in substantial form so to make any changes that are substantive to the agreement, our Board would have to have to meet again to approve it, and like I said we don't have a lot of time.
Mr. Plummer: Quite frankly, I understand that and I applaud  them for doing that  and getting the thing started and coming back and talking to us about working towards an end where we both own our share of what is out there and then operate it. I have no problem with that but the time constraint and I understand that as well, unfortunately  that  is where we are at here because I think if it wasn't through the legal document issue we could work out the rest of it in relatively short fashion.
Ms. Carpenter: I think the key portion of this is the price. I think we need to know what this District would have if they want to buy the property as the assignee or if you decide in three months what the price is because we then don't know. This option to purchase almost doesn't feel like an option because it is open ended. I think this Board needs to know what the purchase price would be within a certain realm. Certainly cost would go up and that sort of thing but I think you need to know what it is you are either obligated to do or not do. I think that is the reason the Board turned down the contract a month and a half, two months ago because you felt uncomfortable with those costs. Perhaps if Lake Ashton II could say, ok if you want to be the assignee right now and buy your portion of the property and will manage it under ground lease, we could do a quick interlocal.
Ms. Sandy: Unless this Board has a very specific proposal on what they would do I don't think we have the ability to work that in at this point in time. Unless there is a very specific, that is not something that is part of our purchase and sale agreement that is contemplated in terms of a ground lease and additional documentation. We do have the ability to name who the final grantee would be, but as I said the two options we have laid out at this point is either at December Lake Ashton II acquires the entire golf course or we work with the developer. That is what we have now. I'm not saying that it is completely a done deal for the ability in the future but that is where we are currently.
Ms. Carpenter: I guess I misunderstood. I thought you said that you could assign your rights to purchase Lake Ashton I to lease that.

Ms. Sandy: We can but I guess what I am saying is on our side we don't have the time to come up with an additional proposal to the Board, what this Board would accept. Unless this Board has very specific parameters on what they would accept, I don't think  we have the time to entertain a new ground lease or a lease option. It would require  a  new interlocal agreement.
Ms. Carpenter: I'm a little in a loss because, and I know  you all have  a contract with a short timeframe that this Board agreed not to do, but I'm a little bit at a loss to be able to say well because they are in a rush, you have to take it or leave it. I don't know if the Board has enough facts to be able to say this is government  funds  and we are going to appropriately use them. You may feel differently and the Board certainly can.
Ms. Sandy: Again under the option there would be no funds required under the option that we presented.
Ms. Carpenter: But we do have ponds and water management district obligations that the Board has to maintain and we are not really sure how that would happen other than as a matter of course. The old golf course operator chose to do it but if this  golf course operator chose not to, there would be a cost to the Board.
Mr. Deane: The city said that the owner of the golf course is responsible for maintaining the golf cart paths and the bridges as they are our secondary road  system  and it is on the documents in the city of Lake Wales. You people  haven't  checked  with the city of Lake Wales yet. You have to find out what you are dealing with. Yes I have.
Ms. Sandy: I don't think there is a question that Lake Ashton II under this option would be maintaining the cart paths. They have agreed to do that.
Ms. Carpenter: Perhaps Mike had the right idea if people have more questions,  hold the meeting open or say there isn't enough information now, you need costs and another proposal to come back.
Mr. Costello: My biggest thing is I understand you are under a time restraint, the clock is ticking. I don't want to deny this to you but by the same token I don't want to give you a blank check. There are things in here which can come back to bite us. Quite honestly, I just can't see where we can in good conscious say go ahead here, we are  going to vote on it and we will make the changes later. I hate to say it, once you move forward, it's out of our hands.

Ms. Sandy: I respectfully disagree in the concept that they are obligations on this District, financial or other responsibilities, that is not in this agreement. If you are talking about future negotiations potentially but that depends on what this Board offers and what the negotiations would be at that point in time. Under this agreement there are not financial obligations.
Mr. Costello: I agree with you from what is in here, fine there is no financial obligations. The only thing being is the fact that six months from now you find out that you are not bringing in the money that it takes in order to maintain this course for 36 holes, like I said you decide you are going to shut down nine of the holes, it is more than likely going to be in our District and we at that point, it leaves too many things open.
Ms. Sandy: I would ask the Board to consider what that looks like versus what currently what that would like which is the same might happen/could happen with the developer. The same could happen with any other. It could happen if this Board were to own and manage the golf course if it is not bringing in the money. There are options out there for the future but I think you know Lake Ashton II. You know the Lake Ashton II  Board members and you know their intention on how to run this.
Mr. Costello: For not one minute do I doubt their sincerity in the fact of what they want to do. I'm not trying go after them or make them look like bad people in any way but we started out this year with five people and unfortunately one of them passed away and we are fortunate that we have a person of good quality to replace him but by the same token we don't know who is going to be sitting in those seats next year. As time changes we don't know what the intent of their new Board is going to be. My feeling is we have to protect the residents who put us here for that exact reason to protect them.
Mr. Deane: Additionally we had residents come to us this morning about ponds which are owned by the golf course which aren't being maintained at the present time. Who said they are going to be maintained after they spend another $500,000 to buy the golf course or where is that going to come from when the membership has dropped by more than 70 members this year compared to last year. There are 243 members this year, there were 312 last year. That is a lot of money at $6,000 a head. Where is that additional money going to come from if it is not assessed to the residents? That is where it comes from.

Mr. Plummer: That is not our problem. That is the West problem. They are operating the golf course. They are the one that is assuming what the membership will or will not be. That is not this discussion. Our discussion here is do we want to own the land that is on the east side and do we want to adjust the interlocal so that we are all in agreement that we are both equally represented in that agreement. I think that is really all we are talking about. What happens to the operations of the golf course as far as financially falls to the West? They made the decision they want to do that. We made the decision, let me rephrase that, some of us made the decision to not progress with that. That is where we are. We are out of that. The only thing we are talking about here today is purchasing our own land and signing the·interlocal agreement to protect both of us of their rights. That is all we are talking about.
Mr. Costello: I think we are trying to say that this agreement needs some changes.
That is all I'm saying. I have no problem with them operating a golf course.
Mr. Plummer: For the attorneys in the house, don't take exception to what I am about to say, but when you get attorneys writing documents, you are going to have disagreements on both sides because quite frankly, they are the only ones that understand the language in there to start with. Having said that, we each have to depend on our own attorneys to make sure that it is a good working agreement with the other. I am not looking to be protected from the West. I want to work with the West. I want this community to be one community. We are going to be responsible to our residents for the things we talked about earlier and the only way we can take care of that and help those issues out is if we own this land. That is it. However we get there we have to get there.
Mr. Costello: I want to ask our attorney how long by the end of the week can we have an agreement that we can look at that would protect the way we would like to do so?
Ms. Carpenter: I believe Sarah said that is not an option. That Lake Ashton ll's, that wasn't one of the options they gave to acquire.
Ms. Sandy: What I was saying is I would need a concrete proposal from this Board. Mr. Costello: That is what I am saying. Can you adjust this?
Ms. Carpenter: It would be a different agreement. This agreement now calls for them to acquire the property and for this District to agree to reduce the boundary size to allow them to put the three holes in Lake Ashton II.

Mr. Plummer: I'm not sure under the present agreements with the developer himself the option isn't whether we can buy it from him anyway. It can only be sold to the other side and we have to be able to buy it from the West.
Ms. Carpenter: Their agreement says they can assign their right to purchase to Lake Ashton I.
Ms. Sandy: I think what Bob was alluding to is what I was saying is with the exception of a concrete proposal very specific parameters at this point including a fair and equitable purchase price paid to Lake Ashton II or paid as part of the acquisition  cost that is probably a non-starter  at this point in time.  Certainly  I can take it back to our Board but I think that would probably be a non-starter at this point.
Mr. Plummer: I'm not sure I understood all that.
Ms. Sandy: What Jan is saying is that yes, we can assign a good purchase and  sale agreement who the land goes to but what Lake Ashton 11 would be expecting in return is a share of the cost for purchasing that land.
Mr. Deane: Share of the cost for buying the land. Is that what you are saying? Ms. Sandy: Yes.
Ms. Carpenter: So whatever the cost was before that you were paying plus their share of legal fees and due diligence that they have spent to date I think is what Sarah  had said before.
Ms. Sandy: Yes.
Mr. Ference: Isn't that reasonable?
Ms. Carpenter: Yes but the Board did turn this idea down a month ago. It is pretty much the same terms as the prior contract. The difference would  be after  you acquire  you would probably, I think from what the Board is saying have a management agreement or something with Lake Ashton II to operate it.
Ms. Sandy: Those are the kind of details of what does that agreement look like in terms of Lake Ashton II operating the golf course, managing a golf course, paying for maintenance if they again are continuing to be the financial responsible entity, how does that work between the two Districts currently? We are going to have a deficit funding agreement with the developer,  there are cost overruns  we can only assess  Lake Ashton II for the cost of running the golf course. This brings Lake Ashton I back into if the land

is getting assigned, my understanding is that this Board didn't want the responsibility that comes with the ownership and management of the golf course or at least wasn't comfortable with it at this point in time. Maybe eventually. Those are items that come with ownership.
Mr. Plummer: I don't understand if we purchase our land and allow the West to operate the golf course, how we are going to come into any of the items that you just said that we would be liable for.
Ms. Sandy: We would have to have a specific agreement on the maintenance responsibilities. It becomes more involved. We would have to have a specific agreement on how the ground lease would work.
Ms. Carpenter: I don't even think it would have to be a ground lease, just a management agreement of some kind that they would be managing it. The hold up in the last interlocal was coming up with a joint management plan. Who would have people on the Board, how it would go? This transaction would be ok, we own it. We will allow them to manage the golf course as a whole and whether we pay them to do that, that would be something the Board would have to discuss the terms of how that would operate.
Ms. Sandy: I understand the Board's discussion. I think we are starting down a path that previously didn't work for both Boards and it ended. Certainly if there is some kind of proposal that we can look at very soon that is something that we can consider but if we are looking to go back to what the structure was before.
Mr. Plummer: Not looking to go back to the structure at all. Not at all. I think we are in agreement here that there is no reason that the West cannot operate the golf course. We just want to own the land and they can operate it.
Ms. Sandy: Maintenance responsibilities and costs would remain with the West.
Mr. Plummer: If we want to talk about cart path, ponds and bridges, I think that's totally negotiable from our standpoint because our residents use all that and we are responsible to maintain those for that. As far as the rest of the golf course, that is part of the golf course management when it comes down to the golf course itself.
Ms. Sandy: I think this is certainly a discussion that we can have. Again in order to move forward with this purchase and sale agreement, I just don't think that we are going to hammer out that management agreement before closing before we need to

decide what due diligence costs were, what we are looking at, what the management structure is going to be. I do think that this interlocal agreement leaves open the opportunity to have that conversation and to potentially do that in the future. I just don't know if we are going to have the time to do that at this point.
Ms. Carpenter: Perhaps this Board  needs  to talk a little bit  about what they  want to achieve and whether it is going with the Lake Ashton II proposal or coming up with a response back to them that is a different proposal of what they have  asked.  We are saying we don't really like this but this is what we are thinking. I think maybe this Board needs to come up with cohesive thought of what they want to do. Do you want to acquire the land and pay for the land?
Mr. Costello: What we are looking at, I don't know but I think basically what we are looking at is to have ownership of the land, rent to you for a dollar a year, whatever some ridiculously low price but you can run the golf course in any way you see fit as long as the land is maintained. Am I right or am I wrong? Most of the people are shaking their heads yes, so I think all we want is non-responsibility. We have other things in here that we run and quite honestly, I don't have any problem with you people running the golf course if that is what you want to do, do it.
Ms. Carpenter: Will Lake Ashton pay for the land to own it or are you looking for Lake Ashton II to pay for the land acquisition in Lake Ashton's name?
Mr. Plummer: I think we need to settle on a figure and we need to purchase  the land on our side and do just what we said. Take care of the items that we talked about earlier and let Lake Ashton II operate the.golf course.
Mr. Costello: If we are going to pay for it, we will rent it to them at a reasonable cost I would think.
Mr. Plummer: Just let them operate it. We don't have to rent it for anything. They are maintaining the greenspace as a golf course, if it would take a dollar to make a contract or whatever legal.
Mr. Costello: This is what I'm saying, legally I'm sure that somebody passed a law that we have to do that somewhere along the line.
Mr. Plummer: The end result is we want to purchase, I'm saying we, I'm going to speak for the rest of the members here, we want to purchase the land that is on the East

but allow the West to operate the golf course  so that we can take care of our ponds for  our people over here.
Ms. Sandy: To be clear, you are talking all of those, you are saying owning  all of the land within Lake Ashton, not just the pathways and ponds.
Mr. Deane: Yes.
Mr. Plummer: Owning all of the acreage that is involved in the golf  course  track that is on the Lake Wales side.
Ms. Sandy: I hear that is what the desire is. Of course that's substantially different than what we have presented so like I said if there is a concrete, and when I say concrete proposal, I'm talking about actual written.
Ms. Carpenter: One thought for the Board, and I don't know how Lake Ashton II is planning to finance this, but perhaps it could be bought by Lake Ashton I and whatever financing terms Lake Ashton II and Lake Ashton I would pay back over time since there isn't time to budget or anything else. It could be some sort of mortgage purchase. Again, we don't know enough of the terms of how you are buying it, but even if they want to do it, we don't budget time to come up with the money at this point, I think we need to know somewhat of what the costs are so you can appropriately budget for it if that is the desire.
Ms. Sandy: The acquisition costs are the same as the prior agreement. It is a public document, we are happy to send the purchase and sale agreement over.
Ms. Carpenter: Ok. It is pretty much the same costs as the Board looked at before to acquire and whether the Board has the cash to acquire now or would ask for some concessions or payment I don't know how Lake Ashton II plans to do that?
Ms. Sandy: We are doing similar financing terms, I think it is five years now.
Mr. Plummer: All this boils down to whatever the actual cost of the land is that we are going acquire.
Ms. Sandy: And the due diligence cost associated.
Mr. Plummer: I understand that. That is part of the cost. How will we be able to get there and get it done?
Ms. Carpenter: And see if they will agree to do that. Would that also include if Lake Ashton II acquired the property, would you also allow them to expand their boundary to take the three holes?

Mr. Deane: No. It wouldn't be necessary.
Ms. Carpenter:  Just checking.  We wouldn't even need an interlocal  if we opened it, we would just need the lease management agreement. I guess you would want an interlocal for easements and all that good stuff.
Ms. Sandy: And the user fees on both sides.
Ms. Carpenter: This one with a little bit of the other one tied in.
Ms. Sandy: If we can get changes to this interlocal, again I have to see when we can schedule it or if it's something the Board would even consider.
Mr. Deane: What you are talking about is the purchase price was $477,000. The developer was paying $240,000 back on that. That leaves $237,000.
Ms. Sandy: We haven't determined the $240,000 remain in the operating funds to cover operating expenses.
Mr. Deane: That would be the cost involved. If you take $477,000 less $240,000, that leaves $237,000. We own 18 holes of golf. If you divide the $237,000 by the 36 holes, that gives you a cost per hole. We would have 21 and they would have 15 but you find the cost per hole and multiply that times the 21 is what the purchase price is for us.
Mr. Plummer: First of all the $240,000 that you are talking about is the pre­ payment of future dues. It has nothing really to do with the acquisition of the golf course. That is really not part of that because that is their future cost for the memberships that they are going to be allowed. What they do with that money is up to them.
Ms. Sandy: It is money that we would likely be using towards the operation.
Mr. Plummer: I'm not sure that we can subtract that from the cost of the course.
Ms. Sandy: There is also the due diligence cost that we have had to date and that will continue to accrue.
Mr. Deane: We had quite a bit of due diligence also which we paid for.
Mr. Costello: The $240,000 was with the intent that it would be used to maintain the property due to the fact that they were giving free memberships to people buying homes.
Mr. Plummer: I understand that. We don't have any say in the $240,000.
Mr. Costello: I agree with you. Let them use that for maintenance. The only thing that I see is that we are buying the land, they are buying  land  but they are  also getting the Pro Shop and the Eagles Nest. There is some value there.

Ms. Sandy: To be clear, I don't have any kind of parameters  from the Lake Ashton II Board. I don't have any kind of authority to negotiate a price.
Mr. Costello: This is why I say it should have been a joint meeting.
Ms. Sandy: I think at this point in time, like I said, without a concrete proposal from the Board on what would be accepted, moving forward we can take that back to the Board but outside of that there is probably not going to be much wiggle room in changing the terms of the deal and going back to something that we previously discussed.
Ms. Carpenter: Ok I think this Board knows and Sarah you have done a great dealing with unexpected questions I guess but the Board hasn't considered it. I think the Board needs. to decide, do you want to come up with a proposal and we can draft something up and get to them and continue  the meeting.  Do you want to think  about it  for a day or two?  It is really a matter  at this point if you don't want to accept  this the way  it is with the open ended terms.
Mr. Ference: What do you recommend?
Ms. Carpenter: I can't really give a business recommendation. I have told you what the issues are in this if you don't own the property or if you do own the property.
Mr. Deane: I think we should extend the meeting and then have a meeting  Friday or Monday, whatever it is within the next seven days.
Mr. Costello: The only thing there is, are we going to need input from the other  COD as to what they are going to agree to? Are we better off taking  one of our people  who has dealt with one of their people, have them try, you worked with Mr. Mecsics I believe, maybe the two of you can sit down. We can suspend this meeting instead of adjourning it and by Thursday come up some sort of an agreement. This way to me would be the most logical thing. We don't want to write a blank check.
Mr. Plummer: Mr. Mecsics is looking at his shoes. Mr. Ference: Jan, is that a doable option?
Ms. Carpenter: It is doable. If the Board wants to delegate to someone to negotiate.
Mr. Costello: I think that would be the best idea. Bob, if you are able to sit down  with whoever they determine.
Mr. Plummer: Jim can't negotiate for the Board without being in the Board himself.

Mr. Costello: All I'm saying is maybe Bob could come up with something,  tweak  this because I think we are all in agreement.
Mr. Plummer: Are we talking numbers?
Ms. Carpenter: I think we could come up with a quick outline of a short interlocal based on what is there with the only open issue really being the cost of the property given the open end. We can come up with what we think it is but that is really a business negotiation. We could work with the other counsel.  One thing if the Board  does  action, we will have to open up the public comment I would think.
Ms. Burns: No we don't.
Ms. Carpenter: It is on the agenda. We could come up with a very  rough  agreement and  run it past Lake Ashton  II if you have the authority  to look  at something, a proposal or something.
Ms. Sandy: Our Board had approved this in substantial form so we don't have necessarily authority to change. We would have to have another Board meeting. That is why we went with what we thought was kind of a bare minimum agreement between the two parties with the intention to continue working together  in the future  on all the items that have been raised. This would allow us to move forward with this December closing date and this would  allow this Board to have no financial  risk on this so we can continue  to have those conversations as it moves forward.
Mr. Plummer: I am going to try and put a little levity into this so are you saying if we pass the interlocal agreement as presented, it would be like let's pass it and then read it and find out what is in it? I was asking a question.
Ms. Sandy: It is fairly short, eight pages and a page summary. This is what we have in place. This is what the Board has currently agreed to so any further negotiations, I just can't say where they would go and what direction we would end up taking.
Mr. Plummer: In answer to your question, Mike, if you would like for me to sit down with Jim and negotiate whatever the dollar is, I think Jim and I can obviously do that.  I think the interlocal agreement is a legal issue and not something, I think  Jim and I could  do a legal issue, I don't think we should.
Mr. Costello: I don't know if Jim has the authority from his Board. Ms. Burns: He doesn't.

Ms. Sandy: Bob can always talk to Jim. Jim does not have the authority to negotiate on behalf of the Board so it would have to go back to the Board.
Mr. Costello: Is there any way we can have an emergency joint meeting in order to put an end to all this back and forth. We have been here for quite a while now and we got the basics down but that is it.
Ms. Carpenter: Perhaps this Board needs to just keep open and have their own meeting to come up with what you are all comfortable with, then submit that proposal to them at a joint meeting to talk about.  It sounds like there is so many issues with whoever  is negotiating is not quite sure what they are negotiating.  It seems  like this Board  needs to agree this is what we want to do. We want to buy this, we want to do a lease, and we want to maintain our ponds. I'm not sure exactly what it is you want to do.
Ms. Sandy: I do want to emphasize even if we did schedule a joint meeting and there was a proposal made, we were given the direction to move forward with the developer option if we didn't get an answer today. There is certainly always the ability to try and schedule a meeting and have that conversation, but as I said I can't guarantee that it is going to be something that we are going to be able to consider negotiating at this point in time.
Ms. Carpenter: Perhaps the developer would be willing to sell it to this Board. Does the contract tie them to not selling to someone during the time period you have an option?
Ms. Sandy: I don't think the contract specifically addresses that. The developer's direction when we were negotiating is that they would assign it as the grantee if that was directed by Lake Ashton II, but they would not negotiate or make the contract  contingent on Lake Ashton's involvement.
Mr. Deane: He is trying to force it through.
Ms. Carpenter: If the Board desired I guess we could see if they would sell directly.
I'm not sure if that would breach your contract, it is somewhat of an interesting term.
Ms. Sandy: As I said, I don't know if that is an actual term, that was just part of the negotiations. The contract currently is to purchase either all of or a portion of the golf course. They are under contract with us. Again, without having any real specifics, I can't really comment on it.

Ms. Carpenter: We need to look at the contract to see if the District could purchase directly from them or have it assigned. It should be the same terms either way whether it is assigned or direct. That is one option if they go forward.
Ms. Sandy: Again, that puts us back where we were before. How do we jointly manage the interlocal agreement we previously had that had numerous rounds of negotiations terminated and brought back the prior purchase and sale agreement.
Mr. Costello: I take it that it makes their life a lot easier if we do purchase this and agree to rent it.
Ms. Sandy: Whose life?
Mr. Costello: The COD II. I take it is easier for us to do this to agree to purchase with no financial burdens on us.
Ms. Sandy: I disagree because then we don't have the ownership rights that come with ownership.
Mr. Costello: If you have to go through attaining a grant by the city of Lake Wales there is no way in hell I assume you would be in there by Friday, finished with the City of Lake Wales by Friday. You are not going to have the answer from them. Like I said my intent, I honestly, if they want to run a golf course, I want to see them run a golf course. I'm just not willing to put ourselves in any kind of financial risk.
Ms. Sandy: I do have to say this interlocal accomplishes just what you said.  There is no financial obligation. It allows Lake Ashton II to run the golf course.
Mr. Costello: We can debate that on page 5, I think it was because, like I say, it looks like to me like we are going to maintain the pathways and ponds.
Ms. Sandy: We can certainly strike that line.
Mr. Costello: I would like to try and get some sort of consensus as to which direction we want to move.
Mr. Plummer: My consensus is we find a way to buy the land. Mr. Deane: I agree.
Mr. Costello: So do I.
Ms. Sandy: That is an option under this interlocal agreement.
Mr. Plummer: I understand that. I just think there is some verbiage in there that doesn't agree with some opinions on this Board. We all, like I said, when a lawyer puts

something together, the other lawyer is going to have a problem with it in some way, shape or form. It is just the nature of the beast. I think that as far as I go and what I see is we want to find a way to purchase the land on the East and give Lake Ashton II the authority to operate the golf course just like we have said an hour and ½ ago. How do we get there? I am not sure we can meet the deadline that you are after if we have to make any kind of tweets to the verbiage. I think as far as hammering the price, that is not a difficult issue. I think it is the verbiage of the interlocal.
Ms. Sandy: I think this interlocal actually intended to accomplish just that, getting us to a point that we can continue to move forward and allow us to continue to have those negotiations if this Board were to purchase the land and we lease back or if this Board were to acquire the pathway and ponds, that is all possible under this interlocal agreement. This just takes the first step in allowing us to move forward with this interlocal option for the purchase and sale agreement.
Mr. Ference: The only problem is again you say they don't have an obligation or desire necessarily to sell us the land when we want if we want it.
Ms. Sandy: If this Board made a proposal to the Lake Ashton II Board to acquire the land for $3, if this said we had an obligation to accept it that is clearly not I fully understand what you are saying. It is hard to build in when you start getting into again specifics just as they have to have a consideration within 60 days but they don't have an obligation to accept.
Mr. Ference: That is right, so they may never accept, no matter what we offer. It doesn't matter if it is financially doable if they don't want to, they just won't. They may turn into something else, 27 holes etc. etc. Who knows what they will do with it.
Ms. Carpenter: I think at this point it sounds like, and again just from a conversation that the Board isn't comfortable with the interlocal as it is drafted with no requirement to purchase with the shrinking of the boundaries of Lake Ashton and with potential unknown costs. I think really the Board is in the position of with the contract Lake Ashton II negotiated with the same terms as the one you, are you willing to buy it under the same pretty much business terms that you turned down before.  That is pretty much  what you are looking at plus paying whatever costs they have incurred.  Do you want to buy that  now under those terms and if so, we can change the interlocal to each side would acquire

it owns for whatever division of cost to be determined. Come up with a number that looks reasonable and then negotiate that and agree that we would enter into a lease and management agreement  for them  to operate it.  That sounds  like that  is what the Board is getting at and it is, really does the Board want to do this under the same contract they turned down three months ago. You are just sort of being forced into this agreement because of their terms. If you want to do that and I hear people upset, I'm just telling you the facts as we see them. That is what has come back before you and you are being pushed to make this decision quickly. If you want to come up with a different alternative,  we can go ahead and draft something up and some up with terms, get this Board comfortable  with the proposal  and then submit  it back to the Lake Ashton II.  I don't see  a whole lot of other options at this point or saying no and the Board goes forward and acquires it, whatever they want.
Ms. Burns: I just want to say one thing because I know not everybody here was at the Lake Ashton II meeting on Friday. They gave staff direction that if the answer was no today that they move forward with the option for what we are calling the developer option. They have surveys that need to be done in a timeline and if they were going to move with the portion just in their boundaries rather than pay for the entire portion, it makes  a financial difference for them. I just want to be clear that there is direction to move forward with the other option should this Board not want to participate.
Ms. Sandy: Like I said with this option I think we would be ok with taking out the boundary amendment portion if that is of concern to this Board. Negotiating a deal that involved a ground lease of the land being conveyed to Lake Ashton would take additional time and as we have said not really time that we have at this point. Not saying that it is completely cutoff and not something that we couldn't eventually do.  I think this starts  us on a path and shows good faith in working together and moving forward. I don't think it  puts a financial obligation on this Board at this point in time because Lake Ashton II would be doing the management of the property. That is really what it was trying to accomplish  so that we can continue to move forward working together.
Mr. Plummer: If Lake Ashton II goes ahead with the option to acquire all of the property and we have an agreement to negotiate a price to purchase ours after the first of the year or whatever, is that a doable situation?

Ms. Sandy: It is certainly something I can take back to our Board.
Mr. Plummer: The only reason I'm saying that is just the time constraint to get something done before your closing date is what I think what is causing the negotiation issue. If you go ahead and purchase it with the agreement, the only thing we need to do is negotiate a price after the first of the year and close the deal on that, we would own the land, they can take and operate the golf course. I'm trying to get us off square one and move forward in a way that is going to be basically beneficial to both of us.
Ms. Sandy: We are again going to have some kind of management agreement and an interlocal. This provides the ability to do exactly what you are saying. It doesn't say that the purchase has to go forward and it is because of those items. Because of the need to negotiate a management agreement and to negotiate an interlocal that is going to take time and detail.
Mr. Plummer: The management agreement shouldn't take long at all. They are going to manage it. That is the end of the story.
Mr. Costello: It is going to be their ball game.
Ms. Carpenter: Bob if I may, I really think if it is the price and the cost that could be negotiated now, that really isn't that big of a deal. Leaving it open just leaves the Board open-ended that they own the property and then you are negotiating on this other side. We know what the cost is now to them. It is really just apportioning it and coming up with that. If that's what the Board chooses to do, I think you could do that in the next couple of days. I know it would be quick but I think it is better than having them close and then try to come up with a price that is fair because then you could just negotiate till the end of time until you all agreed on something.
Mr. Plummer: I don't disagree with you at all. I'm just trying to find a vehicle that moves us forward and not backwards.
Mr. Costello: Can you make a motion that you feel would be an appropriate way of solving this at this time?
Mr. Plummer: I'm not sure how you would structure a motion because actually the motion to be, you are going to negotiate a price. That is the only thing to negotiate.
Ms. Carpenter: I think perhaps it is directing staff to modify the interlocal agreement, have this Board acquire it at a price and then come up with something we

think is reasonable looking at costs and the price of the contract. Whether we do a continued meeting we can attend  by phone to make it not costly if that was the case just  to go over your comfort level on the proposal and then submit that to the other Board.
Mr. Plummer: Can I ask a question of someone sitting in the audience? Ms. Carpenter: Certainly.
Mr. Plummer: Jim, is this doable or are we spinning our wheels?
Mr. Mecsics: Jim Mecsics. Vice Chairman  and the negotiator.  Let me just make this clear for everyone. When we went to negotiations and this started out, the seller was not interested in negotiating directly with Lake Ashton COD Board. I'm sorry, that is just  the way life is. What this agreement was, it was two forms.  As you said the first option  was for us to go it alone and work with the developer and we have five years to work out whatever for the eventual ownership of the Lake Ashton COD I property whether that is someone else that gives us five years. We opened this one up to allow for the option for Lake Ashton COD to get back in the game, not necessarily negotiating a price because that still has to be done and that will just muddy the waters up right now. What we are asking for is your agreement to work with us and let us go through acquiring the property but that still leaves open the door to come back and talk with you as far as negotiating prices. Bob, we are not going to rip you off. You live here. Let's get that stuff off the side please. We are here to work with you and we want to make it so that we can have one community so that we can all have our interests  but just throwing  land lines every time  we turn around it is not going to make it. We are on a time constraint so I'm not trying to force you guys into anything. This is what we have and this is what we have to work with. Any questions? We are not trying to fight with anyone, all we are trying  to do is acquire that golf club and in this case, we would have all the property but that still allows you the option to come back and negotiate  a price with us.  If we are going to get to negotiation, we are not going to meet that timeline, I am sorry.
Mr. Plummer: We would just like to know that there is an option for our negotiation
and not that somehow or another it is going to just on your part to not accept a negotiation and we just don't want to sell it to you, we are just going to sell it to somebody else.
Mr. Mecsics: Bob, I hear you on that.  We want  to work for this one community. see you all the time. I'm here at the restaurant. I don't want to have food thrown at me.

Mr. Plummer: Next year when you are not on our Board, what about the other guys? Mr. Mecsics: I have three more years.
Ms. Carpenter: That is not what the agreement says. There is nothing saying it can't be sold to someone else or that it couldn't be sold to a developer.
Mr. Mecsics: You would get the first option. Mr. Plummer: It doesn't say that.
Ms. Sandy: A first right of refusal.
Mr. Plummer: Does it say that in the interlocal agreement? Ms. Sandy: It does not.
Mr. Plummer: That is our point.
Ms. Sandy: What we were saying earlier is that at least what I heard earlier is that you wanted this interlocal to include a provision saying that there would be in the New Year a proposal that would be accepted. That is different than a first right of refusal to buy the golf course. A first right of refusal would be we would offer to sell it to Lake Ashton before anybody else. To be clear in acquiring this golf course, the idea is not to at this point in time to sell it right away. The point is to run it.
Ms. Carpenter:  That is up to the Board.  This is open ended, it says you can make a proposal some day and they will look at it. That is all it says, it's just the way it is written today. It is not an option saying it is going to be appraised value for the lesser of the appraised value of what they paid. It doesn't give any parameters.
Mr. Plummer: Or right of first refusal. Does it say that?
Ms. Carpenter: It does not have any of that which is what, and again I just got this the same time you did Friday or so, so I have not looked at it in light but it is not a typical option to purchase which I do think is problematic. The other issue I think is that I'm not sure if Lake Wales does not give them the ability to operate outside an interlocal, I'm not sure how they can proceed to acquire property outside their District. That is one thing that this District will need to cooperate in some way I believe under the current law so there does need to be some cooperation to allow them to management it. If the Board wants to go that route, it needs to come up with either a purchase and if they have drafted the contracts so you can't do it, I'm not quite sure we would have to negotiate a price or how else you could do that under whatever agreement. The agreement that you had made and

turned down that they entered into and now you are being sort of forced to deal with those terms in a way to make it work under their agreement. I know I sound negative but it could have been a bit more cooperatively done than this  agreement.  We have the  agreement now to deal with so we are trying to figure out if the Board chooses to do that, let's get it  done and how do we do it in a week under the terms that would work for this Board.
Mr. Plummer: Obviously we want to work with them just as much as they want to work with us.  That is not the issue  at the moment.  I'm just trying  to find  a vehicle  how we get to the end result.
Mr. Mecsics: What this interlocal gives you is the option to buy into the property.
Mr. Plummer: If the verbiage could be changed to simply say that w e have the first option, I'm just asking if that is a possibility.
Ms. Sandy: Yes with this action today I do think that is something that we have to take back to the Board but if we are still dealing with this interlocal agreement and we are talking about just an amendment to that provision talking about the option to purchase in the future being the first right of refusal to purchase, I think that is something that  the Board could consider and likely something that is doable.
Mr. Krumrie: I am not looking for actual numbers but use verbiage  along the lines  of actual cost.
Ms. Sandy: I think we could probably  build  in something,  yes, the actual  costs. Mr. Krumrie: That would address your concerns about inflation and other things.
Ms. Carpenter: I mean the suggestion if you want to go with something like that is you put actual option terms that it would be whatever the purchase in their contract plus some portion of cost with a maximum and maybe the lesser of that or appraised value or something. There is ways certainly in real estate contracts draft options to purchase.
Ms. Sandy: Again I think we are again trying to find an agreement that would be workable at this point in time. The first right of refusal is certainly, but getting into specifics at what the actual costs would be at a future point in time.
Mr. Plummer: We want to buy the property now. We would like to cut to the quick.
We would like to buy the property now. How can we do that now?
Ms. Sandy: We had a purchase and sale agreement that was  terminated  that would have allowed that so now we are trying to find, that is not one of the options that

we have under the current timeframe. That is an option for the future we can talk about that in the new year.
Mr. Costello: You had said earlier that you could assign any grantee that you wanted.
Ms. Sandy: Correct, but the things that have to be worked out at this point in time at this juncture is what property we are acquiring at closing and what due diligence we have to do at this point in time.
Mr. Costello: You don't know what you are acquiring at closing?
Ms. Sandy: As I laid out in the beginning, if we are going with the developer option we are at this point in time just acquiring the West course. If we were able to go with the interlocal option we would acquire all of the property.
Mr. Costello: You know in essence what you are acquiring. All we are saying is let's come up with a price you assign us as grantee.
Ms. Sandy: I think that is going back to the deal that we were trying to negotiate previously and weren't able to agree on so we are going back to that.
Ms. Carpenter: I think the difference is that the Board wants  to  own the property but agrees that Lake Ashton 11 can operate it. I think before they were trying to do a joint operation and that is where it fell apart. How do we put together a joint Board and jointly operate. I think the Board is comfortable with Lake Ashton II operating it completely but Lake Ashton I wants to own the property and then be able to control its use long term etc.
Mr. Plummer: That is exactly right.
Ms. Sandy: I think this point in time where we are is like Jill said, staff has been directed if there isn't a decision to move forward with the developer option. If there is a concrete proposal, a written proposal with specific parameters that is presented we can take that to the Board and potentially still pursue that option but that would have to be at the very near future. That is the issue that we are at.
Mr. Deane: What are you saying, near future? Ms. Sandy: A week.	In the next week.
Mr. Ference: Jan, I think you annunciated pretty much the motion. I was going to say I make that motion until it got a little bit more complicated. You began a few minutes ago to say what would it be a good motion.

Ms. Carpenter: It sounds,  and we probably should wait for Mike to come back, but  it sounds like the Board doesn't want to consider the interlocal the way it is drafted due to the ambiguity but they would consider an interlocal agreement where this Board would acquire the property at the same time Lake Ashton West acquires their property and enter into a lease agreement or operation agreement for them to manage the property,  so modify this interlocal for Lake Ashton acquiring its own portion of the property and having
them manage it.
Mr. Krumrie: I don't think Lake Ashton I acquiring the property is an option. It is an option after Lake Ashton II acquires the property. We would buy it from Lake Ashton II.
Ms. Carpenter: They said under the contract they can assign their  right to acquire  it to us.
Mr. Krumrie: Simultaneously? Ms. Carpenter: Yes.
Mr. Ference: Well, if that is a motion and if the Board Mike, if the Board would permit, can we take that language that Jan just annunciated and make that a motion for this Board?
Mr. Costello: Can you repeat it? Sorry.
Ms. Carpenter: It is what we discussed earlier. It doesn't sound like the Board is comfortable accepting the interlocal the way it is drafted but would like to consider an alternative interlocal where this Board is assigned the right to acquire the property within Lake Ashton I and have that right assigned under their contract and then have a management agreement with Lake Ashton II to operate the golf course.
Mr. Ference: I will make that motion.
Mr. Deane: What if we said we wanted to pay $250,000?
Ms. Sandy: I don't know how many Board members we have in here. I don't want to engage in negotiations that is not a joint publicly noticed meeting.
Mr. Deane: I understand that. I'm just saying if throwing together a number to give you, does it make any difference?
Ms. Sandy: I think it would be hard to come up with all the deal terms within the next week. I'm not saying that it is not possible but again I think we would need a detailed interlocal and a management agreement to vote in it in conjunction with an actual number.

Mr. Costello: This is your deadline that you are trying to meet. We are trying to help you.
Mr. Ference: Let's go forward with the motion.
Mr. Costello: Do we have a second on the motion?
Ms. Carpenter: I believe Bob Ference's motion is to modify the interlocal to have Lake Ashton acquire the property within its boundary at the same time Lake Ashton West acquires the property and enter into a management agreement with Lake Aston II to operate the golf club. A similar interlocal as this one but taking out that they are acquiring the property and expanding the boundaries and those other terms and adding in just the provision to enter into a management agreement and I guess you can similar to this, we can say with terms to be determined later as this was drafted.
Mr. Costello: Motion fails.
Ms. Carpenter: There are too many parameters we don't know. We have not looked at their purchase and sale agreement. They are saying the terms are the same as the earlier purchase so hopefully there is a mortgage and payback period that the Board would agree to.
Mr. Costello: To simplify it can we make a motion that we will buy the property and enter into an agreement at a later time. We are going in circles.
Ms. Sandy: That is what the interlocal provides. If there are specific terms that we can suggest on that provision that would be acceptable to this Board, I think that could potentially be something that we can look at. If what this Boards want is the first right of refusal then I think that is probably something I can take back to our Board but as far as negotiating an actual transfer of the land at this point in time I don't know if we can meet our timeline.
Mr. Costello: We have a motion on the floor, do we have a second? Mr. Krumrie: I will second it.
Mr. Costello: All those in favor.
Mr. Plummer: I'm not sure what we are voting on. Mr. Deane: I don't know what we are voting on.
Mr. Costello: Like I said being thrown this and told that, we need a decision, there is a lot in this, a lot of stuff in this that could come back to haunt us.

Mr. Plummer: If you are telling me the motion is we are going to buy the land and just haven't set the price then that is one thing,  but there are too many other  things  also in that motion.
Ms. Carpenter: It is tough to agree to a price when you don't know what the price is which is what this agreement says.
Ms. Sandy: This interlocal agreement will provide for a later negotiation.
Ms. Carpenter: Then you have already lost your right to the property is the problem. Ms. Sandy: I don't know if the Board currently has a right to the property but the negotiating point that you would have at a future point in time is an actual purchase price. Lake Ashton II and the Lake Ashton II residents are going to be footing the bill for all the due diligence and the acquisition costs so that is still very much a carrot to have in a future
negotiation.
Mr. Plummer: I think the issue is we don't want to push it down the road two  or three or four years, we want to get this accomplished.
Ms. Carpenter: It seems that you should be able to come up with a cost based on the contract and the due diligence, a cost or a cost range should be able to be calculated.
Mr. Mecsics: No, we are not going to be forced into that. Mr. Costello: But you want to force us into this?
Mr. Mecsics: Gentleman if you don't want to be interested, I'm sorry, but with all due respect you are not interested then we came up with two options. We will go along our option way and work it from there. If you vote for, not for the interlocal, then we already have our options laid out. If you are not interested that is fine. We were giving you the option to come back in and play. If you don't want to do that no hard feelings. We know what we have to do.
Mr. Costello: This should have been brought to a joint meeting and we should have been able to negotiate it back and forth, but we get laid in our lap and we are expected to turn around and just give you a blank check, sorry it is not happening.
Ms. Burns: I think it would probably be best if we take a five minute break and then continue with the rest of the agenda if that is ok with the Chair.
Mr. Costello: Sounds good.
Ms. Burns: We are back on the record.

Ms. Carpenter: I think on the golf course I heard they said they would go ahead. Does this Board want to make a proposal back to them to consider to acquire the property with them managing or is this done? This Board does have the ability to do that.
Mr. Costello: I think what we are looking  for is a price.  Give us an offer that we  can work with.
Mr. Deane: I make a proposal that we extend this meeting and we come up with a number to give Lake Ashton II as to what we would pay for our portion of the golf course.
Mr. Krumrie: I second that.
Ms. Burns: Are we delegating a person to work with Jan?
Ms. Carpenter: So to put together sort of revise the interlocal and that provision to have a purchase and we will take the contract and come up with a number,  send it to all  to you all to send us any comments back so you can at the meeting consider the proposal or some other numbers.
Mr. Costello: They need an answer by Friday I believe they said. We want to accommodate them. If this is what they want to do let them do it. We have a motion and a second, all those in favor?
Ms. Burns: I'm sorry I did not get who made the motion.
Mr. Plummer: You said we are going to pause this meeting and go to another meeting and work on the numbers.
Mr. Deane: No, extend this meeting.
Mr. Costello: We are going to extend this meeting. They need an answer by Friday and I'd like to accommodate them on that. We can give it to them. I don't know what they are going to be able to do as far as having the meeting goes because of Sunshine laws. Mr. Plummer: They already made their decision. They could either go with Option
1 or Option 2. I'm curious as to what are we going to do between now and Thursday to come up with the numbers that we can't do right now.
Ms. Burns: That is my question too.
Mr. Costello: That is why I asked for a number. I think Borden has some numbers.
Mr. Deane: The original contract price if I understand is $477,000. If you divide 36 holes by $477,000 you come up to around $13,250 per hole, 21 holes, which we have in Lake Wales, would cost $278,250.

Mr. Costello: The only other thing is they are getting the Pro Shop and they are getting the Eagles Nest and there is value there. How do we accommodate for that?
Mr. Deane: We could reduce our number accommodating with that. We do know that the Eagles Nest didn't make a profit.
Mr. Costello: That is  on  them. Mr. Deane: That is their problem.
Mr. Costello: I would say that maybe we could make them an offer of $250,000.
Mr. Ference: Before we go forward, we have someone here, Bob Zelazny, who did the numbers for the West real cost, some real numbers.
Mr. Zelazny: We ran the numbers based on the due diligence that we had already done, the advance due diligence and then what the cost and financing would be for both golf courses the bill would be $946,000. That is all due diligence that we have done to date, due diligence to do the rest of it and then the price of the golf course with financing. It was $884,000 on our side. If we bought yours, it was just the bonds which was approximately $63,000. It was about $940,000 something. That is the acquisition cost.
Mr. Costello: We have paid some of that out already, have we not?
Mr. Zelazny: I have included our money that we have already spent. We were at
$159,000 in expenses already to date so you have some more so it might be a little more because we shared costs in the beginning. It would be a little bit higher. Our acquisition costs for both courses would be $940,000 something. Does that help?
Mr. Deane: That is including financing and everything else.
Mr. Zelazny: That includes financing over a five year period. That includes our bonds and includes your bonds.
Mr. Deane: It includes all the bonds.
Mr. Zelazny: Yes. Financing is included.  $51,000 for financing.  I'm pretty close. Mr. Ference: You wanted a real number, you have a real number.
Mr. Zelazny: You have to add the $240,000 to the acquisition costs. Ms. Burns: It is an operational cost.
Mr. Deane: You said $946,000 so you are looking at $1,187,000.
Ms. Burns: That is right. I think there was a motion and a second to come up with some kind of number and then we decided to do it now.

Mr. Costello: Do we want to make a motion at $250,000?
Mr. Deane: They are talking about financing the whole thing plus the interest part, we are just talking about paying cash for land. That is a big difference, a huge difference.
Mr. Costello: Do we want to make an offer at $250,000?
Mr. Plummer: Is that including the three holes then assigned to them?  I just want  to make sure.
Mr. Deane: Anything within our boundaries they can use. Mr. Plummer: In the interlocal?
Ms. Carpenter: So you are talking $250,000 plus you would agree to allow them to expand and take those three holes?
Mr. Plummer: That is my question.
Mr. Deane: That is part of the city. We are just talking about buying the land for the 21 holes that we have.
Mr. Ference: If we were to take out the finance charges since you are going forward, five years financing, suppose we were to pay cash, on our part how would that effect the financing number off your head? How much would that reduce the total?
Ms. Burns: It was like $50,000 for the financing, so you are not talking about a big portion.
Ms. Carpenter: They are looking for $473,000. It seems like the $250,000 is way low unless you are going to give them the other three holes or something  else in addition to that.
Mr. Costello: They are also getting the Eagles Nest and the Pro Shop. There is value there.
Ms. Carpenter: That is very true. They have buildings on their property.
Mr. Ference: Well let's take the $50,000 off for the financing so we wouldn't have to pay that.
Mr. Costello: Leave it at $250,000. It is an offer,  if they want to they can counter  the offer and we will see where it goes from there.
Ms. Burns: Do we have a motion?
Mr. Costello: I think the motion was that we would make an offer to COD II that we would purchase the land at $250,000.

Mr. Deane: Just the land.
Ms. Sandy: Is this part of the purchase and sale agreement or part of the interlocal agreement?
Mr. Costello: It has nothing to do with the interlocal.
Ms. Carpenter: We would have to have a modified interlocal. Mr. Costello: Ok, modified interlocal.
Ms. Carpenter: So it would be to purchase it now for $250,000 and then taking out the expansion.
Ms. Sandy: As part of the interlocal agreement?
Ms. Carpenter: Yes. So, if they accepted that then we would draft some quick modifications to this to show there would be an operating lease by Lake Ashton II.

Mr. Costello: We have to go back to unfinished business, Election of Officers. Ms. Burns: We didn't  elect officers.	We swore him in but when we get a new
Supervisor generally I would suggest going one of two routes. Either you can go ahead completely reassign or if you wanted to make a motion that the four of you retain your offices and we would name him as an Assistant Secretary you could do that.
Mr. Plummer: Are electing officers normally in December or January?
Ms. Burns: Any time you have a new Supervisor that joins the Board you would generally.
Mr. Plummer: If you didn't have a new Supervisor, it is an annual?
Ms. Burns: Every two years when the composition of the Board changes. That  being said, the Board could re-elect Supervisors at any time.
Mr. Deane: I make a motion that we have sworn in the new Board member and he be appointed as an Assistant Secretary.
Mr. Costello: Second.

Consideration of Engagement Letter with Grau & Associates to perform
the Audit for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2019
Mr. Costello: Consideration of the engagement letter with Grau & Associates to perform the audit for fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.
Mr. Deane: I make a motion that we use Grau to perform our annual audit.

Restaurant
Mr. Costello: Mr. Deane requested that we put under new business something on the restaurant.
Mr. Deane: ,Andrew met with the owners of the restaurant. They realize that they are not in compliance with the lease. As of Saturday I went to the restaurant again asking for the papers again to come compliant with the lease and we still don't have  them. Another thing which we found out today, their rent check for October bounced. We presented it a second time and it bounced again. They are in default with  paying  the lease. I believe that it is time, and I don't want to do it but I think we are going to have to send them a notice and then look for a new restaurant operator.
Mr. Costello: Christine, in talking to you I believe we may have people who are interested in looking at this or what?
Ms. Wells: Possibly.
Mr. Deane: The first thing we would have to do is make a motion to send a cancellation notice to the current owner.
Mr. Plummer: I have a question. You said they were in arrears for their rent. The second item was that an insurance liability issue?
Mr. Deane: As far as this present time I don't know if they have insurance period because they sent us a proposal. This is the insurance they are going to get and we have constantly asked them for the insurance page which you get like you're a homeowner and we have received nothing. As many times as I have talked to them to be perfectly honest with you I doubt if they have insurance.
Mr. Costello: That is a biggie. Do we have a motion to send them a cancellation?

Mr. Deane: I made that motion.
Mr. Costello: Do we have a second? I will second it.
Ms. Burns:  Can I ask one  question?  Do you want  to give time for them,  we have a couple things we need to open it for audience comments also. I don't  know if you  wanted to send a notice giving them a certain time period in which to come compliant  and if they don't they can terminate.
Ms. Carpenter: I would suggest a ten day demand that they produce this within ten days, if not they would consider the lease. I think it is appropriate  to give  them a short time period to produce everything they need to produce.
Mr. Costello: The thing is there's the fact that I believe you and Andrew met with them two weeks ago and we still don't have anything. Operating without insurance. You know that if they can't get it out of them they are going to come after us.
Mr. Deane: I believe that we should  send them a letter with  a five day time period. If we do not have what is required in the lease and a certified check for October's rent because the check has bounced twice so we cannot  redeposit  it again that they consider a notice to vacate.
Mr. Plummer: Jan, does the five day meet statutory requirements?
Ms. Carpenter: Under the lease I believe we can terminate  particularly  if they are  in default. We will check it before we send the letter but that should be fine.
Ms. Burns: This item was not on the agenda. Legally we have to open up to public comment if an item is added that the Board is going to vote. So that is what we are doing now. Anybody that wants to comment on this will have the opportunity to do so now.
Mr. Krumrie: Let me first say I'm totally unfamiliar with the paperwork side of the lease. I would like to say though that I do enjoy going there. The staff is pleasant. I would ask that because we have gone through four or five or six restaurants in the 12 years I have been here that if we are going to make the bold step to remove them from their contract, that it at least be on the agenda so that people can come to register their support or their dissatisfaction on the restaurant.
Mr. Deane: We are not talking about support or non-support for the restaurant, we are talking about compliance with the lease and that has been going on for over two years.
Mr. Krumrie: How much is the lease payment?

Mr. Deane: $1,000 a month.
Mr. Krumrie: So we would let a restaurant go away?
Mr. Costello:  It is not only a matter of that, we have no proof of insurance.   That is a big liability there. God forbid something happens in there. They are going to come after us if they can't go after them.
Mr. Krumrie: I agree, we definitely have to have insurance, there is no question about that.
Mr. Deane: We gave them a year free the first year.
Mr. Krumrie: I understand we gave a lot of people a free year as well. For $1,000 the height of the season we would let them go away. I don't think we should do that.
Mr. Costello: This is why it has been suggested that we give them notice and let them try and produce, at least give us proof of insurance. Give them five or  ten days' notice and let them produce proof of insurance before we make a move.
Mr. Krumrie: So we will make a move after ten days.
Mr. Deane: We are not doing anything  until the expiration  time  on the letter that we send them. If the letter expires and they have not complied  with the lease then they  are out basically.
Mr. Costello: If it was just a financial matter as far as the $1,000, I agree with you we could overlook that but the insurance, which is a big deal.
A resident: Just wondering, are there other points of the contract that they are out of compliance or it is just the insurance or what else?
Mr. Deane: That is one of the items. A resident: And the other?
Mr. Deane: Well they are supposed to do inspections, they are supposed  to give  us copies of maintenance contracts and everything else and none of this has been done over the past two years. I agree that it is probably more people satisfied with  the restaurant than dissatisfied but we have a lease people and they have to comply with it. The insurance is not a minor issue.
A resident: It is not but if you are going to include that, why wouldn't you bullet point everything that is out of compliance.
Mr. Deane: In the letter everything will be bullet pointed.

A resident: I agree insurance is a real biggie but I'm wondering in the interest of having a restaurant here if maybe it would be possible to not charge them rent.
Mr. Deane: Everyone who is gone into the restaurant is given the first year rent  free. The $1,000 a month just about pays our tax bill on that restaurant. They are not paying any utilities, any water or any electric. Owning a restaurant, previously the electric for that restaurant is probably in excess of $3,000 a month.
Mr. Costello: Anybody else? Any other comment.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Attorney
Monthly Reports
Ms. Carpenter: The only thing we have is the easement issue that Rey mentioned. Andrew had reached out to counsel for the golf course and requested the easement  for  the drainage issue of the homes that have had the ongoing drainage. We noted that the engineer determined the cause of the flooding was drainage received from  the Eagles Nest which the Lake Ashton COD stormwater system apparently was not designed to receive that much water. The response we got said that they requested more information  to even consider the request. They wanted  to know how the golf course amenity  would  be impacted and is the request of the golf course owner would just gratuitously grant the easement. They said they are initial thoughts so we will of course go back to them and probably have Rey go back and give them some of the engineering detail as to why it is required and go from there. Just wanted to bring you up-to-speed on the response.

Community Director
Monthly Report
Consideration	of	Security	Golf	Cart	Preventative	Maintenance Agreement
Consideration of Quotes to Add Handicap Door Openers to  the Hallway Restrooms
Consideration of Stormwater Prevention Maintenance Agreement
Ms. Wells: The community director report was in the agenda packet. There is a just a couple of things that I wanted to point out is that as you know we have been reaching

out to TECO and received a couple of credits. The recent one, we received a credit of
$3,990 for being charged for double brackets. We are still working with them to make sure we are getting charged the correct amount for switchover from the double lights to the single LED's. I will keep you guys posted on that. The three metal doors are pending installation. There was a delay on the materials. Bridal showcase has been scheduled for April 16, 2020. Also, the Astonliving.net domain has been transferred over to the HOA. In the agenda packet also was the Performance Plus Golf Cart preventative maintenance agreement. All the items that it included was in there. I'm sure you don't want me to go over every single thing it includes. The cost per golf cart was determined to be $1,140 per year totaling $2,280 for the year and it is billed at a monthly rate of $190 per month. This was something that was discussed in a budget workshop and I believe was a line item on our budget now. It is just in here for consideration for Supervisors. We just need a motion to approve it.
Mr. Plummer: You said it was a line item in the budget. Ms. Wells: I believe so.
Ms. Burns: I think so. $1,140 was in the budget.
Ms. Wells: It is actually $1,140 per golf cart now. When they first told me they didn't give me both golf cart prices so it is actually double, so it is double what is in the budget. I did look at it last time, we did only spend about $1,000 in maintenance last year. They are getting old. I'm just bringing it forth since it was discussed. It is up to you guys whether you want to approve it and move forward with doing a preventative maintenance agreement.
Mr. Costello: Do we have any other proposals?
Ms. Wells: The reason we went Performance Plus because that is who we have the golf carts through right now. I would be more than willing to get Art's Golfs Cart to give us an agreement as well. I have said that I'm not sure how long they are going to last. We did just replace the batteries on one golf cart. That is one of the things that is included in the preventative maintenance agreement.
Mr. Plummer: When I look at the service and the maintenance that price includes all parts, labor, pickup, and delivery and diagnostic charges at no additional cost. Like you said if it needs a battery or whatever that should be included.

Ms. Wells: It does but we had to replace the battery before this agreement was put in place. That is why I mentioned that, that golf cart is probably not going to need new batteries for a while so it is up to the Board. My thought is if you are planning possibly replacing the golf carts in the next year or two, it is probably not a good idea since we just spent $1,000 last year on both carts. If your plan is to extend the life of the golf carts  longer than that, then we may want to look into doing a preventative maintenance agreement.
Mr. Plummer: When you read the entire contract about what it covers and what it doesn't cover, the price isn't as bad as you really think it is. Everything  is included  with one exception and that exception is any vandalism or collision or cosmetic stuff is not included which is pretty normal.
Mr. Costello: Ok, do you want to make a motion to accept it?
Mr. Plummer: I was still waiting on the life expectancy on those two gems? Mr. Deane: When did we replace them that last time?
Ms. Wells: I would say three or four years ago. They do have a part at the  beginning that says during our initial maintenance there were a total two golf carts with maintenance performed during that time we determined zero cart golfs  are currently  at end of the life. They are determining that it is not an end of life.

Ms. Wells: The next item was consideration of quotes to add handicap  door openers to the hallway restrooms. We had two not exceed quotes, they are way off from each other. The one was not to exceed $5,000 for the installation of two handicap door openers in the main hallway restrooms. The electric cost  was  not exceed  $500.  The other one was $5,600 each.  They  are way  off.   I don't know if you want me to still solicit a third quote and bring it to the next meeting. They are way off.
Mr. Ference: Yes, let's get another quote.
Ms. Wells: The last thing was consideration of the stormwater preventative maintenance agreement. Again that was something else that was discussed in the budget

workshop. We do have a pro quote. I did get with Rey before the meeting.  He  has reached out to Steger Site Preparation to see if they could give us a second quote. The amount in the budget is the amount that All-Terrain  provided  which  was $7,500 per visit. It was done twice a year.  I believe there is $15,000  in the budget right now.  It includes the ride through the property, check damaged curbs, sidewalks, and pavement, make detailed list of addresses and description of work and they will check the storm water system, all retention ponds for possible failures and they again  recommended  to make that assessment every six months. Like  I said there  is a second  quote that  is solicited, we just haven't received it back yet. Again whether  you want to accept All-Terrains  or  wait till we get an additional.
Mr. Ference: Wait till you get another quote.
Ms. Wells: Ok that works. The ice machine at the restaurant which is outside on the screened-in patio is in need of repair. I have received, I will start with the quote to just simply repair the ice machine. Miller's quoted $1,186.43. That is to install a water circulation pump. The warranty is one year parts and labor. I was asked to also get a quote on replacement of the ice machine with one just slightly smaller than what we currently have. I received three quotes for that. Miller's Central Air quoted $4,250. That is three year parts and labor, five year compressor, condenser, and coil and ice plates. There would be an additional $300 needed in addition for a top kit which the bin that we have right now is made for a much larger ice machine so when they replace the machine head which is on the top they will need a conversion kit. It is $4,550 total. Then I received a quote from Wideman and it is $4,600, then United Refrigeration quoted $4,565.43. It is whether the Board wants us to move forward with a repair or a replacement?
Mr. Ference: How old is the machine now? Mr. Deane: Twenty years old.
Mr. Ference: Wow.
Mr. Deane: I think it is time to replace it.
Mr. Ference: Sounds like it. Is there one vendor you would rather work with than another?
Ms. Wells: I think Miller's is the least amount as well and we have worked with Miller's on quite a few projects and I feel comfortable with them.

Mr. Ference: Then let's go forward with Miller then.
Mr. Krumrie: Did Miller's recommend that particular size or did  you  recommend that size?
Mr. Deane: I recommended to reduce the size because of the size of the bin we have. In three days that bin will be full with 1,500 pounds of ice. We don't need a 900 pound ice machine. I recommended that we reduce the size that was the $4,500. If we went with the size  that we have,  it is almost  $7,000.  I recommended  reducing  the size. It is a 500 pound machine. That is a lot of ice. The bin is big enough that it will hold probably about 1,500 pounds. That is why I recommended it.

Field Operations Manager
Monthly Report
Consideration of Quotes to Replace the Boulevard Irrigation Well Pressure Tank
Mr. Fisher: Good afternoon. Included in the exhibit packet is the field operations managers' report. If you glance over that any questions I would be happy to answer for you. In the meantime we ran into some problems with the irrigation well down the Boulevard and the front entrance. It was brought to our attention by Yellowstone that we were in need of a larger pressure tank. Those are like the blue tanks  outside  this exit here. Included are three quotes. Yellowstone was $1,096.95. Irrigation Tech was $875. Baynard Plumbing was $750. This pressure tank is an 85 gallon pressure tank and it will eliminate most of the problems we have been having which have been a lot in the past month or so.
Mr. Ference: Have you worked with any of these vendors before?
Mr. Fisher: Yellowstone who is our landscape contractor.  They  are the  highest and Baynard is the lowest and we do tons of work with Baynard.

Mr. Fisher: Thank you.

CDD Manager
Ms. Burns: I spare you and pass, thanks.
Mr. Costello: I have a question. Back in May we sent the City  of Lake Wales  a letter about money that had been for sidewalks out in front here.  What ever happened  with that? Has there been any disposition to that?
Ms. Burns: Andrew sent the letter.
Ms. Carpenter: We have not gotten any comment back.
Mr. Costello: I had a copy of it yesterday. Unfortunately I didn't bring it with me. It was written like on May 16 or 17 or something and we haven't heard anything from them?
Ms. Carpenter: We can try and reach the city and try and talk to them. Mr. Costello: That would be nice. It was like $19,000 or something.
Mr. Deane: I go to the Lake Wales meeting and I asked them about the sidewalk money twice. They keep saying they keep looking  for it and they haven't  found  it yet.  That is what they tell me. I didn't know Andrew sent a letter.
Ms. Carpenter: We will follow-up but most  of these usually put that money  into  their funds for sidewalks, it is not usually a portion directly for any particular sidewalk, almost like an impact fee but we will try and follow-up and see if we can find anything out.
Mr. Costello: It has been five months, we should have an answer by now.

NINTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Approval of Check Run Summary
Combined  Balance Sheet
Mr. Costello: Approval  of the check  run summary.

Mr. Costello: Combined balance sheet.
Ms. Burns: There is no action necessary on that but I would be glad to answer any questions anyone might have.

TENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Steve Realmuto: I will keep this brief since I do think something needs to be said. First of all I applaud your approach to acquire the golf course or make an offer  at least to acquire it directly as the designee from the developer rather than allow the title

pass through COD II and then negotiate for purchase, however you need to understand they were very clear and had a contingency plan. My understanding is they intend to proceed and obtain the City of Lake Wales permission to do what they want to do with it. My understanding, what their attorney stated that at their last meeting was that they were planning on coming to the November 19 meeting to do that. There was also a meeting that he couldn't come November 6th   .   I would like to ask this Board to take a formal position on that and send the City of Lake Wales a letter with the Board's position on that. Also encourage each of you and residents to show up and voice their opinions at whatever that is scheduled for. Thank you.
Mr. Ron Buran: 3002 Ashton Palms Drive. I believe it was the September 2018 COD Board meeting I attempted to read into the record the definitions from the CC&R's as our registered at the County Courthouse defined what property the COD owns. What constitutes the golf course tract and what responsibilities the HOA had in regard to this. Because of the arbitrary three minutes rule I was not able to get that all into evidence however I presented to the COD counsel at that time several drone photographs of the property behind my home which has fallen into disrepair which Christine and the tax maps show as golf course tract properties, the CC& R's define as COD property. I have received no response as far as any decision by the COD counsel in that regard. If the new survey shows that it is still in fact part of the golf course property and does not conform to the CC&R's, I will take every effort that I can to impede any sale of the golf course tract until that issue is resolved.
A resident: Hello again. In order to make this deal work you guys really  need to work before you leave this room today. There is a framework that I think will work that is just my personal opinion but I have been  out this now for as long as you guys have. I  have spoken at great length to both Boards and to the developer. If you go in there and offer them $250,000 for your portion of the land it will not work. They are  already committed to going it alone. If they go it alone it will create so many more  problems  for this community that we cannot allow it to happen. Here is my suggestion. I think the lawyers can figure this out, at least I hope they can. I have a lot more faith in lawyers then you do my friend. You need to do an amendment or revise the agreement  and here is what it needs to say. It needs to say that you will jointly own the property. I believe legally

that can be accomplished. COD I and COD II become joint tenants in owning all the property. I think legally that will accomplish the things that need to be accomplished with transferring three holes, all the things that go along with it. You need to do a management agreement. The West has said they are willing to take the management of golf club so let them do it but we need to retain the right and the obligation to maintain the ponds, the bridges, the cart paths and everything else that is in our District. Let them do their District and we will do our District. Hopefully one day we become one District but I don't see that happening. I have lived here long enough, I don't know if I can but if you do an agreement like that the purchase price then can be calculated as half of what their costs are. Trying to put a number on it is impossible because you have the Eagles Nest. You have a building, you have 21 holes, if you had months maybe you could do it. Let's be honest, this Board backed itself into a corner when you pulled out of the deal. The West went in and grabbed the bull by the horns and said we are doing it. They have a deal on the table. They can do it without this Board. They said they are going to. You heard them in here today. Calmly they said hey, we presented you with this deal, take it or leave it, which I will say for the first time I'm agreeing with your counsel, you cannot sign that agreement with an open ended even though I think in good faith they probably would act in good faith but trust and verify. Can you before you leave today come up with language that our attorney can draft to suggest joint ownership because again I have looked at this and I'm not practicing anymore so my brain is not as sharp as it once was but I think that accomplishes the legal objective. If it doesn't, then you need to put in the interlocal language that allows the purchase to go forward jointly. Ok that will accomplish your goals of getting us the property now which I think is the right thing to do. Let the West manage the golf course which they seem willing to do. They are going to do it without us. The number can be figured out, one, you guys haven't even seen the sales agreement. You are not even a party to it anymore. You are out of there. Although they suggested it is the same, it may be very close, it may not be but there is a number in there. We got the numbers he put in. We have the bonds and you have your due diligence and their due diligence. There is a formula that will come up with 50% of what's going out and what we have to come up with. I'm urging you not to leave the room today because anything else will be a waste of time. You send them a proposal that says $250,000.

Mr. Costello: We said $250,000 and we also said let them counter. A resident: There is no time they are going to go it alone.
Mr. Costello: It is not our fault that the time is running out. We only got this agreement on Friday.
Ms. Carpenter: I think the joint ownership is problematic for the same reasons because it is two Districts in each other's property but I think  the point is understood  by the Board, the Board if they want to come back with something. This Board very much wants to work with Lake Ashton II and I think the idea is yes we will each own  our  own  but you operate as one club.  We are happy and willing to operate it. I think that has been  a big concession so it is really a matter of a number and we can put together an agreement very quickly.
A resident: I sense a big hesitation on the West without getting those three holes transferred over because as you have said, the future Board's may think differently. Without those three holes they don't have a golf course.
Mr. Costello: Precisely. I have said from the beginning of this meeting I don't want to be an obstructionist but I don't want to write a blank check either.
A resident: You heard me say I agree with that position but saying you don't want to be an obstructionist and doing the opposite.
Mr. Costello: It is not our fault that the time is the way it is.
Ms. Carpenter: I think both Boards are in the same position. They want the three holes, our Board wants one of the buildings. It is just the way it is.
A resident: That is why joint ownership.
Ms. Carpenter: It would be nice but it would be meaning going to both cities and getting powers and it would be a lot.
Mr. Costello: As far as the building goes, let them run it. It doesn't bother me in the least. I proposed three months ago that we buy it and lease it to them and everybody looked at me like I was, forget, it isn't going to happen. It would have been the best thing that could have ever happened.
A resident: There was a deal on the table and it's gone so now we need to find the right deal that makes this work. We can't go backwards. You want to go forwards. You don't want to be an obstructionist.

Mr. Costello: And I think a lot of that is in the fact that you have to look at so many other things that we do. We have the restaurant  going  on.  We have a lot of things  and we are willing to say to them if you want to run a golf course, run a golf course. We will  help you in any way we can.
A resident: It is a good deal if we could pull it off. In order to pull it off we have to  put it together to something they can say yes to, otherwise they are not going to do it.
Mr. Costello: We are not saying they have to say yes to it, we are saying come back with us and tell us what it is going to take in order to satisfy them.
A resident: We have been doing that for years.
Mr. Costello: This should have been a joint meeting like I said.
A resident: Going back and forth takes time. In any event I just think that the concept and the framework for a deal is there. Don't let it pass again, that is why I said don't leave this meeting because that adds to the time  problem  of presenting  something to their Board and they are going to come back. Your Board has to consider it, their Board has to consider  it. It is an issue so try to put something  on the  table they  can say  yes to. I don't know if you can do that or not. I think the lawyers  have to work a little harder  now  to jointly make this happen in terms of the legal aspects of the ownership. I know it is a problem I know that Chapter 190 presents some problems  but where there  is a will there is a way and you guys can do it if you want to. Thank you for your time.
Mr. Costello: Thank you.
Mr. Pete Perez: I have a couple of things. Number one, that idea of putting those lights out at the entrance was wonderful. Old guys like us, we really can't see and now it is lit up, it is great. People that are knocking it down are idiots, however I just wanted to say that. The other thing I just want to say is Jackie and I have been living here for 15 years. Because of health reasons we are selling our home and we will be moving back down South Florida. We want to thank you for your service and I have nothing more to say other than thank you.
Mr. Costello:  Thank  you. Ms. Burns: That is very nice.
Mr. George Rogers: Just briefly. A third lawyer's opinion, how about that.  This Board decided that in fact the first option, the sales agreement that was offered several

months ago was a bad deal. There was no way they were going to make up their deficit. That hasn't changed. When you properly got out of the deal that again hasn't changed. The COD II decided to go ahead all by its own to continue on with a bad deal which makes it worse when one COD tries to take care of it. They are not going to make up those deficits over the next five or six years. They are going to be in terrible financial trouble or they are going to have to be doing assessments and so forth on their homeowners. If you make an agreement with them and there is litigation over how bad a deal it is they made we are going to be drawn into that litigation. I oppose you doing any deal with them, somewhere down the road with them because of this bad deal they have all these deficits they are not going to find another buyer. There is no reason to worry about competition. The only way they are going to be able to get out of debt or share some of the financial problems is to sell the property to us four or five years from now. I don't see any reason to have to rush into anything or any agreement particularly one that may get this Board involved in litigation down the road. I am a trial lawyer that is all I have done in the last 45 years is litigation and I could see litigation coming.
Mr. Costello: Thank you.
Ms. Debbie Landgrebe: Gullane Drive, Lake Wales. In regards to the ponds that people were complaining about, would the COD be able to write a letter to the golf course owner indicating their lack of taking care of things? Who does that fall on?
Ms. Burns: We have done that and we have also sent letters to the City of Lake Wales and Winter Have Code Enforcement as well.
Ms. Landgrebe: And no response. Ms. Burns: Correct.
Ms. Landgrebe: What is the next step legally? Maybe we need to sue them. In regards to the golf course I do think it is a very unfortunate that we received that document Friday night. I don't think that gives everyone time to digest or process anything. I would caution about jumping into anything because those rocks all need to be uncovered. I do hope that COD II purchases everything and wish them well in doing that. The last thing I have to say gentleman I'm very disappointed that you all choose not to  bring  a female onto the Board.
Mr. Costello: Ok.

Ms. Burns: I think we need to continue the meeting.
Mr. Costello: That is what I was going to ask. Do we want to continue this in the hopes that we are going to be able to have some sort of interaction with COD II?
Mr. Ference: I will make a motion that we continue this meeting with the  anticipation that we will hear back from COD II within a certain time limit.
Ms. Burns: We need to pick a date and time to continue the meeting to. Mr. Costello: Thursday afternoon, let's say 1:00 p.m.?
Ms. Burns: I have a two hour window on Thursday only sorry. I have between
10:15 and maybe 12:30. That is all I have.
Mr. Ference: Can you have someone replace you on Thursday?  Not that we want to replace you.
Ms. Burns: Jan says I'm irreplaceable.
Mr. Costello: What is the timeframe on this? I know you said the end of the week. We want to accommodate you and we want to get you an answer in time where you can  do something.
Ms. Burns: They don't have a meeting even scheduled to even consider anything.
Mr. Costello: The only thing is the offer is going to whomever. I don't  know how they are going to make a decision  with  the Sunshine  laws the way they are.  It is a sin that our hands are tied. All I am trying to do is accommodate them. Can they call an emergency meeting?
Ms. Sandy: Emergency meetings are meant for like hurricanes.
Mr. Costello: I'm simply trying to accommodate you people that is all I am trying to do.  Everybody  says that one is against the other. I'm not against  this.  If you want to run a golf course, run a golf course.
Ms. Sandy: Do we have a meeting scheduled for November 7t h  ? Mr. Costello: Jim, when is your next meeting scheduled?
Ms. Burns: They don't have anything scheduled in November at all.  We are going to set one after we had an answer today that was the intent.
Ms. Sandy: What would be the earliest day?
Ms. Burns: The earliest would be the Oct 31st or November 1st, next Thursday or Friday.

Ms. Sandy: We would have to call our Board and see if we can even schedule a meeting but that is probably the earliest that we could meet to consider something. My suggestion would be if we can, something, a counter proposal in writing then we can try and schedule a meeting and look at it and work with your counsel  to see if we can come up with something that would make this acceptable  to both  Boards with the hopes that  we can bring it back.
Ms. Carpenter: Why don't we set a continued meeting for this Board if we possibly can Thursday or Friday at least to have a quick conversation about a proposal back? That would give them time to advertise after that if they felt they wanted to go forward.
Mr. Costello: Can we have a quorum for Friday? Ms. Burns: I still only have two hours on Friday. Mr. Plummer: I thought we can't get the room.
Ms. Wells: It is till one. It is just whether counsel and the manager can be here.
Ms. Burns: As long as I can get back to Orlando by 5:30 p.m.  to get my son I can do Friday afternoon.
Mr. Costello: What about 1:30 p.m.?
Ms. Carpenter: We have a meeting, Andrew or I can come. Is Thursday better?
Ms. Burns: I have two to two ½ hours to be able to be here on Thursday if you want to do that. I have a meeting later in the afternoon.
Ms.  Carpenter:  What  time is your availability?	I can do 10:15 a.m. to probably 1:30. That gives a couple hours on Thursday.
Mr. Plummer: That is ok  with  me. Mr. Costello: What time Thursday? Ms. Burns: 10:15 a.m. or 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Costello: I'm going to say yes. Is the room available here?
Ms. Wells: I will have to see. Caroline, can you check the schedule and see  if  10:30 on Thursday is available in the ballroom?
Mr. Costello: They said that they need an answer by the end of the week.
Ms.  Carpenter:  We  will  make  changes  to  the  interlocal  to  incorporate that
$250,000, we could do that and send it back.   If there is no particular comments that
would need discussion we could then submit it to them formally. If we have issues then we would have to come back and have a meeting.
Ms. Burns: Are you guys comfortable with Jan drafting that and submitting it?
Ms. Carpenter: Let's continue it to Thursday at 10:30 a.m. If we don't need it we don't need it. We will try to draft up just some modifications to their document.  If it looks like everybody agrees we can submit it. Again I can't poll people but if nobody has comments, if we meet, we can meet briefly, we can even call in just to get whatever comments is any and give it back to them Thursday afternoon so _there is a formal proposal for them to consider if that is what the Board chooses.
Mr. Costello: Ok I will make a motion that we continue this meeting on Thursday morning at 10:30 a.m. and try and get some interaction between the two groups.
Mr. Deane: Second.

ELEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	ChairmanNice Chairman
MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The recessed meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District held on October 21, 2019 was reconvened on October 24, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Clubhouse Ballroom, 4141 Ashton Club Drive,  Lakes Wales, Florida 33859.
Present and constituting a quorum: Mike Costello
Borden Deane
Robert Plummer Bob Ference Harry Krumrie

Also present:
Jillian Burns Jan Carpenter Christine Wells

Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Governmental Management Services District Counsel
Community Director

FIRST  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Ms. Burns called the roll and established a quorum was present and led the pledge of allegiance.

SECOND  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public	Comments	on	Specific
Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting)
Mr. Costello: Ok public comments. The first speaker, Maxine Ritter.
Ms. Burns: We just want to state for the record that this is a continued meeting from the meeting that was advertised on October 21, 2019.
Ms. Ritter: Good morning. The LACDD II has presented us with a  unique opportunity offering to purchase the 36 hole course from the developer and maintain the access to the golf course equally among the Lake Ashton residents regardless of their address. They are not asking us for a monetary commitment. They just want our support. The response from the LACDD Supervisors seem to be laced with suspicion and skepticism. The folks on the West are our friends. They are our neighbors and

sometimes they are family members. We play golf with them. We socialize with them. We spend our holiday celebrations with them. The LACDD II realizes that for various reasons we have not chosen to purchase the golf course at this time. The East gets additional time to buy in if they want. The maintenance of the ponds, the path and the golf course is removed from the developer and the whole ugly mess that is has gone to buying the issues in Lake Ashton gets resolution. Once again, the discussion has come down to us versus them. Later on Monday afternoon after I was at the COD meeting, I was reading my email and I saw an email regarding the food truck and entertainment event that is going on at the HFC. My first thought was oh, that is a West event. Then it hit me I had never thought that way before and it made me sad. It was the first time that I ever succumbed to negative thinking, it should make us all sad that we have let this situation come to this negative place. We are one community. We share our entertainment events, the pools, the pickleball courts, the restaurant and all of the other things that make Lake Ashton a good place to live. We have no reason to assume that the LACDD II has written up the interlocal agreement to purchase the golf course and present it to us with the intent to somehow trick us. I think that it is insulting and rude to make that assumption. I think they came to us in good faith. The purchase of the whole golf course would be an asset to the East just in having the maintenance of the course and the ponds out of the hands of the developer. The East is being handed a gift here. Whether or not the three holes could be seated to the West as a governmental issue that should not have any long term negative consequences to the East. We already think of those golf course holes as being West. The solution that the West has crafted and have paid for seems far more beneficial to us then it is to the West. The West is assuming all of the risk and we are getting a lot of benefits. The price for us buying into the golf course came up on Monday's meeting. Rather than being concerned about what price the LA COD II would charge if we decided to buy into the golf course, we should be concerned with how it could combine our two CDD's and become one community saying multiple duplicate costs and pulling our resources to become one strong community together. This would show true fiscal prudence. I strongly urge the Board to approve the interlocal agreement to allow the LACDD II to purchase the whole 36 holes and do it quickly before they change their minds.

Mr. Costello: Thank you. Trish Safer.
Ms. Safer: 3754 Litchfield Loop. I'm concerned that there is not enough consideration for us in signing this agreement. I see the only consideration that we get is golf course path access. I'm not convinced that this will be enforceable if access was denied. I think consideration that you should have before signing in writing should be that the East course will be maintained to the same level as the West course so as not to have seeding issues as you discussed about if they decided they only needed nine holes. Number two, we could negotiate at any time a price for purchase directly with the developer during the years that they are operating the course. Number three, the top price for us would be a pro-rated current purchase amount with no more fees added as we have already incurred fees and would if there was another purchase. This would give us time to see if the plan of decreased fees to golf members really works or if it is going go up in cost via assessments. It will also give us the actual cost to operate the golf course by a community and know the deficit cost per member on the East. Thank you.
Mr. Costello: Thank you. Mr. Zelazny.
Mr. Bob Zelazny: 5291 Pebble Beach on the West. First I would thank you for continuing your meeting from Monday. I apologize for not being able to stay to the end. I just want to remind everyone here the West wants to work with the East, that is why we asked for you to reengage and see if we can become one community, one purchase and move forward. I would ask in your negotiations today you do the following; you approve the sale of the golf course tract to the COD I, that you negotiate a cash offer to our COD so that you can retain ownership of your property and that you would cede holes 13, 14 and 15 and the two lots adjacent to the Eagles Nest to the West and then I would ask that your negotiations when you figure out what you are going to offer that you make sure you include due diligence, legal costs and closing costs. If it is a complete package I believe our Board would be more than happy to entertain it at our next meeting. You need to discuss what a joint use agreement would be, golf club versus the golf course tract and who maintains what. The lady who just spoke, Trish, you should not be concerned with the operation of the golf club. That responsibility has been accepted by the West. All you are doing is talking about the purchase of the golf course tract, land which is in the East and how we address that. Thank you.

Mr. Costello: Thank you.
A resident: I was here Monday morning when you were discussing the golf course and I just want to know, it was left off very abruptly, good job, Mike, but my concern is that they wanted you to sign something, I don't know if it was in the form of a purchase and sale agreement or it was just going to be included in some sort of a form that was already agreed upon? It was very confusing to understand. However, in Florida don't land transactions have to be in writing? They can't be verbal contracts? Can anyone answer that?
Mr. Deane: Yes.
A resident: How could they expect you to agree upon a price when there was no price ever given? That is not a purchase and sale agreement. They wanted you to buy back or we wanted to join them in purchasing this and then allow them to manage it as I understood it. Is that correct?
Ms. Carpenter: The transaction very briefly is an interlocal agreement, a written agreement was presented to this Board where Lake Ashton II would purchase both courses East and West side. This Board would approve that plus some other things to allow them to do it and operate it. The purchase and sale was something that came up afterwards that the Board was planning to discuss today.
A resident: Ok. I'm definitely in agreement with that. That would include three holes on the East course or it is the whole thing that we are talking about?
Ms. Carpenter: It hasn't been discussed yet. That is what the Board is here today
to do.

A resident: Ok, thank you very much. Mr. Costello: Do we have anymore? Ms. Burns: No.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
A. Consideration of Draft lnterlocal Agreement between lake Ashton CDD and lake Ashton II CDD Regarding the Acquisition, Operation and Maintenance of the Golf Club
Ms. Carpenter: Just to bring everybody up to speed. The Board at the last meeting rejected the interlocal agreement presented by Lake Ashton II and instead talked about considering a similar interlocal, but one where this Board would purchase the land within

its boundaries and allow LA II to purchase the land within their boundaries and have Lake Ashton II operate the entire golf course. There is a number of other issues  but that was  the premise. We did take the interlocal agreement and modify it to quickly incorporate those ideas as well as anything else that comes up today. That  is where  the Board  is  now to consider this potential offer back to Lake Ashton II.
Mr. Plummer: I would like to address the issue and in fact make a motion. First of  all I would like to make a motion that we allow the West to purchase the golf courses. I would also like to enter into an agreement with them that we purchase the East golf course from them as soon as they can assign it to us at a cost of $250,000 including all closing costs. $125,000 of that at closing time and $125,000 at one year from the date of closing, allow Lake Ashton II to purchase golf course holes 14, 15, and 16.  Allow Lake Ashton  II  to operate the golf course operations on Lake Ashton I land at no cost.  The reason  I  stuck that in there was I was concerned if we lease it to them, then it may alter our not for profit status. Cart paths, bridges and ponds on the East property shall be maintained by Lake Ashton I and there is an issue with the Pro Shop and Eagles Nest. It quite frankly straddles the EastNVest border. My continuing part of this motion to convey at some point the two lots that are on the East side of the Pro Shop between the Eagles Nest, Pro Shop and Dunmore  to Lake Ashton  II.  That would  also take care  of that issue.  Finally I want to work diligently to finalize an interlocal agreement to include this offer and  all issues going forward with any and all the golf course issues.
Mr. Ference: I will second that motion.
Mr. Costello: Do we have any questions on that motion?
Mr. Deane: In the first place I don't think we can give land that is in Lake Wales to the COD on the other side. That has to go through the City of Lake Wales if I'm not mistaken. We can't clear title land over to another.
Ms. Carpenter: With cooperation we can, it would mean changing  the boundaries  of both Districts and there may be some lots split necessarily and a number of other things but if both sides want to do it, it can be done, it just depends on how the cost would be  split and that sort of thing.
Mr. Deane: The problem is if you do that and have a continual boundary you are taking 80 homes that are in Lake Wales and putting them in Winter Haven.

Ms. Burns: Not homes, the golf course parcels only.
Ms. Carpenter: We are just talking about the parcel that has the Eagles Nest on it.
It does appear at least from aerials that the buildings straddles East and West.
Mr. Deane: He's talking about holes 14, 15, and 16 also.
Ms. Carpenter: For the holes that would require an expansion of their District and contraction of this District yes. It wouldn't affect residents. That would just be the golf course property. That is doable through the various cities we would have to go to.
Mr. Deane: If the cities agree to it. Ms. Carpenter: That is correct.
Mr. Deane: I have been told by Lakes Wales that they don't want to give up any property.
Ms. Carpenter: Because it is probably not producing much income  it may  not be the same issue as the entire golf course but again that would be something that would have to be taken into account in the agreement that if it couldn't happen we would  come up with a different long term lease or something.
Mr. Deane: What I was told in order to have a continual boundary that they would have to give up houses that are located currently in Lake Wales to move  the boundary  that would include because the boundary runs straight down  the street  and on the left  side of the street are Lake Wales home. On the right side of the street are Winter Haven and I'm just saying what I was told that would  include them having to give up the homes  on that other side of the street to encompass the golf course property and they are unwilling to do any of that.
Ms. Carpenter: We can expand the boundaries without necessarily changing  the city boundaries. It would be just allowing Lake Ashton II to have some property within the city of Lake Wales. A COD can straddle  the lines of the city and county  as long as there  is two different cities. It is fixable. It will take some negotiations with Lake Wales  and Winter Haven to make sure it worked, but it is doable.
Mr. Plummer: You are actually not moving any land that is extended in either city from that city, you are just allowing someone else to purchase that land.
Ms. Carpenter: Exactly and you would be just expanding the boundary of  the District but that doesn't matter if that is in the city limits or not as long as both cities agree.
The lawyers can work through that with their attorneys. It shouldn't impact from a city perspective. It wouldn't impact their revenue or anything.
Mr. Deane: I'm just saying what I was told.
Ms. Carpenter: I appreciate that and of course we would have to look through title and everything else, but again, with direction we can draft up something to figure out  a way to make it work.
Mr. Costello: I think my only question is the maintenance of the land. You want us to maintain?
Mr. Plummer: Ponds, bridges and cart paths just like we talked about since day  one. Part of my reasoning behind that is we have fielded multiple requests about ponds and the shape that they are in. We have told them rightly so that until we own them we can't spend money on them. Under this agreement we would own the land, which includes those ponds, and then we can actually get the ponds back to where they should be and what they should have been along as well. That is neither here nor there.  It  is a matter that we would own it so we can take care of it.
Ms. Carpenter: The ownership of those I think also, one of the key points would be ownership and the cross easements for people on both sides to be able to use the path system so we can make sure those easements are actually drafted and in place so it doesn't come up again.
Mr. Plummer: That is under the last item as far as working with the interlocal agreement to make those agreements, which I think is very important that we do that to make sure that they do have access to both.
Mr. Costello: My only other question would be the maintenance of the course itself. We are talking a business that has been on down scale over the last several years and it is quite possible that if there is a financial problem, I can only imagine that and rightfully so they would probably want to close down holes within our jurisdiction prior to closing down any part of the course within their jurisdiction. My only question is are we going to become responsible for maintaining this property? I realize we wouldn't have to maintain it the way the golf course is and it would probably become much less expensive but there is things there that are just, it is always a possibility and not only that, like I said you look at the makeup of the Boards now, you don't know who is going to be here tomorrow. You

just don't know. I realize that they can't give us 100% assurance that it is going to be maintained or that it is going to open or anything else but there is always that possibility. Mr. Ference: That is why the future Boards will take the issue up, not us. We are dealing with the present, not the future. How can we determine the future when you just
said we don't know what the Boards may be in the future?
Mr. Costello: All we are doing is protecting ourselves against a problem in the
future.
Ms. Carpenter: Bob, the way we can do it is to include in the interlocal that there
would be a lease or maintenance agreement, an agreement between the two for Lake Ashton II to operate all the holes in the golf course for a certain period  and  then they would have to come back. It would be an automatic termination for renegotiation if they want to close holes or change the level of maintenance. We can put that in the interlocal. These are some basics. That way, yes, if for some reason they wanted to stop and this Board would have the maintenance obligation that would be another discussion of what you want to do with the property.
Mr. Costello: If you don't try to protect yourself against the future don't buy insurance. Don't buy insurance because why worry about it. Whatever  happens  just  worry about it when it happens?
Mr. Deane: That is something that has to be put in the interlocal agreement.
Mr. Costello: I think that quite honestly they have to look at the fact that they are getting a building, they are getting two businesses, the Pro Shop and the Eagles Nest. They are getting equipment. They are getting golf carts and I think the $250,000 is more than acceptable as far as I'm concerned. Thank you.
Ms. Carpenter: The Board did ask us to look at the property appraiser value, the building is at about $340,000 which is generally much lower than the actual market  value just so you do know that there are numbers to support that position. We initially drafted to enter into an agreement that they would run the golf course as a cohesive whole. We can bolster that a bit to say that it would be operated at the same standard  and with some  sort of 90 or 180 day termination should  they want  to change  that which would  give the Board a chance to renegotiate something different or decide which holes. That wouldn't obviously have to come later but we can put some basic parameters in to keep that comfort level.

Mr. Plummer: Mike, I appreciate your attention to the detail of trying to foresee the future, but by the same token, if we Lake Ashton I and Lake Ashton II Boards can't put some trust back between us, it is going to be difficult to do much else going forward.  This is just a start at building that relationship.
Mr. Costello: I understand what you are saying. Personally, I trust the other Board. They are going to do what they want to do and they run their District is a very good manner as far as I'm concerned. I don't have a problem with sharing amenities or anything else. Jan is telling us that through an interlocal that we can put something in there and it will go forward fine. The only thing I'm trying to do is to make sure as time goes on should they find a reason and it could happen, maybe it won't happen.  I hope it doesn't  happen, but  by the same token, if we can do it with an interlocal agreement let's do it that way. All I'm asking for is some sort  of insurance  more-or-less  that this place is going to be kept  up. As far as the lakes, they are a mess. We talked to the people from Applied Aquatic, Christine and I two weeks ago. They are looking at least ten treatments in order to get these bodies of water back into the condition that they were.  Their biggest fear is what   are they going to do the inhabitants of the water, the fish and everything else? There are expenses that we are going to incur but like I said they are getting a lot on this deal as far as I'm concerned. I like your motion, I think it is good, but by the same token, I think that  we need assurances. If we can do it through an interlocal, let's do it.
Mr. Plummer: That was the reason for the last item in my motion was to work
diligently on an interlocal agreement that would be agreeable to both Lake Ashton I and Lake Ashton 11.
Mr. Costello: We have a motion and a second. Do we have any other questions on the motion or any other comments?
Ms. Carpenter: I have two questions on the real property stuff. The three holes conveyance, would that begin immediately on figuring on how to do it or after a certain period? That is a bigger and more expensive issue. Would that be something you would want to put in there? The ability for them to acquire it if they want with a cost or something.
Mr. Plummer: Wouldn't it be more efficient to acquire it right away?
Ms. Carpenter: That would take some time because we have to go to both jurisdictions. That is time consuming.

Mr. Plummer: Then I would say whatever the best avenue to accomplish that is.
Ms. Carpenter: On the Eagles Nest, do you just want to make it more general either dedicate property or figure out a way to have that building wholly  within ownership  by LA II so it is no split if that is the case or just leave that for now?
Mr. Deane:  You can leave that the way  it is.  They  say they  are going to manage it and have those two buildings and run it.
Mr. Plummer:  That is not the issue.
Ms. Carpenter: The issue is we just need to make sure we know who owns that so  if something ever does happen we have clear ownership of the building.
Mr. Plummer: There is approximately 10 or 15% assessed in the East. That is the
issue.
Mr. Costello: Do you feel that they are going to have more trouble annexing the
property that the Eagles Nest and the Pro Shop are on due to the fact that they are businesses and they are going to be taxed?
Ms. Carpenter: I think we just put we will cooperate to achieve in the West  side  and we can figure out how we do it down the road. I think that is the issue.
Mr. Costello: I think if we can get this agreement through I'm willing to go to bat for them as far as able to annex that property.
Mr. Plummer: I don't think we are talking about annexing at all, I just think we are talking about selling the land so they bill on it just like the land on 14, 15 and 16.
Ms. Carpenter: We just have to figure out where the lines in the city are because it is very strange that it is divided in the middle but it's because these were formed at the County so maybe for any title issues we will cooperate to clarify for them to get ownership of the building on their side, the West side.
Mr. Costello: Financially I mean we are really not going to be holding  any risk  as far as any other then maintaining like you said the cart path, bridges and ponds.
Ms. Burns: I just want to summarize what I have for the record what your motion was. I was writing very quickly. I have $250,000 including closing costs to purchase the land within the Lake Ashton boundaries, $125,000 at closing and then $125,000  to be  paid one year from that date, purchase holes 14, 15, and 16, allow them to operate the  golf course, including on the East side at no cost.

Ms. Carpenter: Operate the golf course at no annual cost, but they certainly will have costs to do so operate for no rental fee.
Mr. Plummer: My only concern was if we leased it to them what that would do to our nonprofit status.
Ms. Carpenter: We are a government so we don't have to worry about that, but we have to make sure it all works. It would be some kind of agreement to lease or whatever, but we are not charging them to do that. They will have insurance and the other costs associated with operations.
Ms. Burns: Lake Ashton would maintain the ponds, paths and bridges within the boundaries of Lake Ashton, and convey the two parcels around the Pro Shop to Lake Ashton II.
Ms. Carpenter: I would say the parties will cooperate to make sure that if there is any property disputes or lines that the property of the Eagles Nest is wholly within Lake Ashton II ownership. We can come back once we have specifics how best to do that.
Mr. Plummer: The last we're just working diligently on an interlocal agreement.
Ms. Burns: That is what I had, I just wanted to make sure we had  it worded  in a way everyone was ok with it.
Mr. Costello: Do we have a joint meeting scheduled? Ms. Burns: No.
Mr. Plummer: In fairness here, does the interlocal agreement in any way shape, now that Lake Ashton 11 has an offer on the table, does the interlocal have to take place before their closing or can it be worked on past the closing date?
Ms. Carpenter: I would think that they would want to have some sort of written agreement as to what we are doing because they need to know if they are going to acquire both their side and this side, or if we are going to acquire this side, so I think we need to present them. I think we made enough edits that we are fairly close. Really just cleaning  up the property conveyances.
Mr. Costello: In reality I think this should have been a joint meeting, but we couldn't do it due to Sunshine Laws. I think we both want to get together to clarify which way it is going to go.

Mr. Carpenter: So, basically in response to their interlocal, this is their counteroffer back. We can, I guess to make it happen quickly, if the Board would approve this with the modifications.
Mr. Plummer: I was going to say some of the issues in the changed interlocal as presented obviously has changed again with this motion if this motion passes.
Ms. Carpenter: We have the $250,000, we can just clarify that. We need the property and the cooperation on the Eagles Nest parcel but I think the paying for the maintenance of the paths we sort of figured that. We guessed a little well on this. Having Lake Ashton II operate it as a cohesive whole and we just added some language to make sure whatever agreement that they could make a change to, not operate a whole or different standards without the Board.
Mr. Plummer: Obviously that work is in conjunction with Lake Ashton ll's attorney, as well.
Ms. Carpenter: We would have to get the Board comfortable with this. Perhaps we could make the changes, send it if there's no major issues. You can all take a look. If we had to come back we could have the meeting again, but I think at this point it is really just adding a couple of the terms I have heard, and then present that to Lake Ashton II as a counteroffer.
Mr. Plummer: The one that you sent us, have you been in contact with Lake Ashton ll's attorney in regard to those?
Ms. Carpenter: No, we haven't. Sorry we just got it to you guys last night.
Mr. Plummer: I understand that. My question is, can the attorneys work on it before we even get to the point of the joint meeting, if you guys can agree on the language?
Ms. Carpenter: Yes, we can. I think it's really a matter of the offer needs to be considered by their Board whether it is in a final interlocal or not but if that is the offer I think that offer can be presented to LA II with a draft interlocal for them to accept with the revisions that the attorney's beat each other up on.
Mr. Plummer: Obviously they can modify the interlocal as they see fit as well.
Ms. Carpenter: The business transaction could be presented just as a verbal agreement and get this done as quickly as we can.
Mr. Plummer: Is that what they need to move forward?

Ms. Carpenter: I think so. I think adding to your motion would be to direct staff to complete and add the terms not there so a verbal offer with a draft of the interlocal be submitted to Lake Ashton II.
Mr. Plummer: I agree to add that to my motion. Mr. Ference: I will second that.
Mr. Costello: Any other questions? All those in favor.

Ms. Carpenter: Mike, if it is ok I just want to report from the last meeting. We did send a demand letter to the restaurant saying we needed the insurance and the certified check. Borden, if you could respond.
Mr. Deane: We did send the demand letter to the restaurant, and for lack of better words, pissed me off, because within twenty minutes after I gave them the letter I got copies of the insurance, so it is something that they have had and I don't know why they haven't been able to give it to us for 18 months. It is ridiculous. We also  received yesterday the certified check for the bounced check so they are in complete compliance. I'm checking out their insurance, I know they have the liability in the amount that is required, but I do not know if they have workmen's compensation because it is a separate insurance policy and it is not listed on the policy that was given  to us.  Other  than that, that is where it stands at the present time.
Ms. Carpenter: Ok that is good. That is improvement. Just keep us posted if you need us to look into any of that.
Mr. Deane: I will, don't worry about that.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Costello: Do we have any public comments?
Mr. John Velebir: 5205 Green Drive, West. Just wanted to welcome you guys and your money to this folly. The West has in the interlocal, has made all kinds of promises. Certainly from your perspective you are completely indemnified for almost  everything. Have you looked at all to see what their capacity is to fulfill is those promises? There are only 442 houses on the West side.  I don't know that they can tax and assess  us enough to fulfill all these  promises.  My point to look at the future,  no one else but my prediction   is the West COD is going to be bankrupt within a couple of years. Just like they stampeded you into giving them $250,000, they will stampede you into having to maintain  all of this.  In the meantime welcome, appreciate the money. Maybe it will make my assessment a little bit less in the coming years.
Mr. Zelazny:  First let me thank the Board.  I think today was a great day not only  for us but I think for Lake Ashton as a whole so I do appreciate the work the Board did to put this deal together and I think it will be accepted by our Board without many issues. I wasn't going to talk about it, but since John brought it up, we have 680 not 400, and if you look at the number, our payoff  to the golf course  $128,000  for the first year  going down to $119,000 through year six. That equates to $190 per home for six years. That is what the assessment will be if the golf course does not turn a profit. Granted I welcome your money, but quite honestly, you got a good deal at $250,000 when you consider the deal originally was over $1,200,000 when we talked  at broad numbers.  I think for $250,000  you did get a pretty good deal. Thank you for your leadership and for getting it done.
Mr. Costello: I think on behalf of our Board here we wish you luck in running the golf course.
A resident: I would like to know what it is going to cost us to maintain the bridges, paths and ponds and service calls just to get the ponds back up. Do we have any idea what it is going to raise my amenities in the East? I feel sorry for the West, but I'm also worried about the people in the East on the lower income side as I would say because a  lot of us are not from New York or California and are on fixed incomes. I  just want  to  know what the cost is going to increase. Do you have any idea?
Mr. Costello: I have no idea.

Ms. Carpenter: The Board generally doesn't respond, but the District has the obligation to maintain those under the permit, so the obligation is there. I think at this point we already realized we are going to have to on this side be spending some money to get those lakes up to speed even with the current golf course owners. It is somewhat of an inevitable cost and now it is in the Board's control, that just so the Board knows that you have the obligation anyway.
A resident: I want to thank Borden Deane and Mike Costello. You guys did a great job finding all the hidden costs for us. I appreciate it that.
Mr. Costello: Anybody else? Ok, Bob.
Mr. Ference: Thank you, Lord, for all that we have done in this meeting, yesterday, today and tomorrow. We appreciate you giving us the opportunity to love our neighbor as ourselves and do what is right for everyone. Having said that I appreciate that. I make a motion that we continue this august meeting.
Ms. Carpenter: We probably should continue this, in case the other Board comes back with questions or comments, otherwise we have to wait the ten days to notice. If we continue this, hopefully everything will be fine and we can do it without a meeting.
Mr. Costello: The only other thing is in the meantime I would like to see a combined meeting set up between the two CDDs only because of the fact that there are a lot of loose ends here that we would like to tie up prior to putting our signature on anything.
Mr. Ference: But it gives us the opportunity to say thank you Lord. Mr. Costello: We should always say that.
Ms. Burns: Do you think it would be appropriate to allow their Board to consider this offer first should they accept the terms?
Ms. Carpenter: We have to get them to agree to a joint meeting. We will propose it to them.
Mr. Plummer: There is no way for a joint meeting until they officially approve.
Ms. Carpenter: They would have to say yes, we would like a joint meeting, so it would be wise to continue this in case something comes up we can respond fairly quickly.
Mr. Costello: Can we do it indefinitely?
Ms. Carpenter: No, it has to be a date, time and place. Mr. Deane: We have to do it next week sometime.

Mr. Costello: How about after Monday coffee?
Ms. Burns: I think we are going to need more time.
Ms. Carpenter: Whatever your availability is. I'm traveling most of next week so Andrew will have to cover that. I'm in Tallahassee all week.
Ms. Burns: How long do you think until you will have the agreement?
Ms. Carpenter: I would say Tuesday or Wednesday. That gives  us time to draft it up, have the Board look at it. If we have  issues we can come back but gives  us time for  us to get it to their Board as well.
Ms. Wells: Caroline, can you look at the schedule for Wednesday?
Ms. Burns: I'm available in the morning and Wednesday. I have to be able to make it to St. Augustine by 4:00 p.m. I can do about 10:00 a.m.
Ms. Carpenter: For this Board let's get a date. We may not need it, but if something comes up that we can't resolve and we need you guys Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. and if it is just a question or two we can even just call in and get a simple question answered.
Mr. Ference: At what point will be know that, not until Tuesday night?
Ms. Carpenter: Probably Tuesday. If there are a number of issues Andrew  will come in person, if not we can attend by phone if we have  a question.  Hopefully  it won't be an issue and we can go right to a joint meeting perhaps.
Ms. Burns: We are just making sure the room is available. Ms. Wells: Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. will be fine.
Ms. Burns: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. at this location.
Ms. Carpenter: Hopefully we won't need it and we will be all set for a joint meeting, but thank you for doing that.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	ChairmanNice Chairman
MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The recessed meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District held on October 24, 2019 was reconvened on October 30, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Clubhouse Ballroom, 4141 Ashton Club Drive,  Lakes Wales, Florida 33859.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Mike Costello Borden Deane Robert Plummer Bob Ference Harry Krumrie

Also present:
Jillian Burns Andrew d'Adesky Christine Wells

Chairman  Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Governmental Management Services District Counsel (phone)
Community Director

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Ms. Burns: I just want to state for the record that this is a continuation of the meeting that was advertised for October 21 and then was continued to October 24 and then continued again to today.
Ms. Burns called the roll and established a quorum was present and led the pledge of allegiance.

SECOND  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public	Comments	on	Specific
Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit to the District Manager prior to beginning of the meeting)
Mr. Costello: Ok public comments. We have a request by Mr. Steve Realmuto.
Mr. Realmuto: Good Morning. I'm glad to see that we now have a path forward that gives us greater control over our communities' future. Hopefully the COD II Supervisors will accept your offer, only then will the deal be close to being done. As we move forward and the attorney's work to finalize the legal documents, there is several
October 30, 2019	Lake Ashton CDD

details on which I believe you need to give them direction. One, and I'm  sure  the attorney's know this is the deed to the property and not the interlocal agreement that the easement to guarantee all residents access to the golf cart paths  and bridges  needs  to be binding perpetual. Two, an easement should be included to allow the already approved drainage work near the Eagles Nest to proceed. Three, the tax assessor herself has been here and told us in this very room that it is possible some or all of the golf course property will be taxable depending on decisions made regarding its operation accessing membership. Since the operator will be making these decisions and not you it is essential that the agreement either prohibit non Lake Ashton residents from being members  or at the very least the lessee is responsible for the taxes. Four, while it is unclear to me exactly what problem ceding ownership of the three holes to COD  II actually  solves  since it will be operating the entire golf course anyway, it is foreseeable that doing this creates a problem for COD I residents. As you may know many COD resident  properties  area 5 abut the property you voted to cede to COD II. This creates a situation where they will  have to go to COD II whose Supervisors they did not elect rather than their elected Supervisors in COD I to request pond maintenance or improvements that are foreseeable such as boundary fencing. You could fix this by you keeping the property they abut to within COD l's boundaries or perhaps by including appropriate easements.  Finally  I believe a previous speaker at the last meeting raised the issue of trust. As any good businessman knows this isn't about trust.  In fact it would  actually be much  less divisive  to the community to resolve all of these details in writing ahead of time so that everyone remembers what the agreements actually were going  forward.  As much  as you might trust current Supervisors or Boards, they do change over time. This agreement done properly is perpetual.
Mr. Costello: That is all the requests that we have.

THIRD  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
Consideration of Draft lnterlocal Agreement between Lake Ashton CDD and Lake Ashton II CDD regarding the acquisition, operation and maintenance of the Golf Club
Ms. Burns: Do you want me to give an update of where we are? Mr. Costello: Yes, please.

Ms. Burns: Our counsel drafted an interlocal that had the updates that we discussed  at  the  meeting  on  the  24t h  .   That  was  circulated  to  the  Board  on  Monday. Everyone reviewed it. It was sent to the Lake Ashton II attorney's  late yesterday.  They had a couple of issues that we think still need to be worked through between Jan and Andrew and Mike and Sara. We have been trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this without having to go back and forth with ten days of meetings. Back to the other Board we are running out of time. The thought of being here today is to have this  Board designate one person to work with Jan and Andrew and counsel for Lake Ashton II and their appointed Board member Jim to come up with a form of interlocal agreement  that  can be presented at a joint meeting with a proposed date of November 8, 2019. That is what we are looking for today.
Mr. Ference: Does that require a motion designating someone from our Board?
Ms. Burns: Yes. You would say that it would be to authorize somebody to negotiate an interlocal with counsel and the Lake Ashton II Board member and their counsel to present at the November 8, 2019 meeting would be the motion.
Mr. Costello: You are just talking about going over the interlocal and coming up with more or less a finalized version to present at a joint meeting on November 8th   ?
Ms. Burns: Correct.
Mr. Costello: I could work with Jim as far as that goes.
Mr. Plummer: Mike, can I make a suggestion? Since it was my motion with all the bullet points that has probably made a lot of changes in that I would gladly accept and work that out with them since that probably would be any of the issues in those changes we did through the motion of those. It was actually seven bullet points.
Mr. Ference: If that requires a motion then I would make that motion that Mr.
Plummer represent us because of the reasons he just annunciated.
Mr. Deane: I understand why Bob is making his motion and I understand Mike worked with Jim before with regards to interlocal agreements. If there are any changes made I think it has to be brought back to the Board before it can be voted on. Period.
Mr. Costello: As of now it is all in black and white. All we are going to do is look at it. Like it was brought up by the speaker here there are a few issues that really prior to signing this or approving this they really need to be reviewed.

Ms. Burns: The person appointed doesn't have the ability to agree to anything.
They are negotiating the part and would be brought back to the Board.
Mr. Costello: Like I said it is in black and white. I think I was the one I think in the beginning who started the negotiations prior to Bob coming on. It is just a matter of me going over it with Jim and seeing whatever changes are going to be made.
Ms. Burns: We have a motion on the floor from Bob Ference to appoint Bob Plummer as that person. Is there a second to that?
Mr. Krumrie: I will second.
Mr. Costello: We have a motion on the floor and a second all those in favor.

Ms. Burns: That is really all that we had today. The only other item I would say are you guys ok with November 8t h   at 11:00 a.m.?   Lake Ashton II has a meeting scheduled in the morning at 9:30 a.m. and we thought we could schedule the joint meeting immediately following.
Mr. Plummer: We are assuming that the negotiations would  be finished  at that point and presentable at that meeting.
Ms. Burns: That is the hope that we would have a form of interlocal agreement to present to both Boards at the joint meeting. If that is ok with everybody, we don't need a motion, we can just go ahead and advertise.   We will have Christine  and Mary announce. I just need to confirm with the Lake Ashton  II Board  that works  for them but they will all be there that day anyway that would be held, I checked the date with Christine. The USO Dance is here so we will be holding it at the HFC because this room is unavailable.
Mr. Plummer: Does that meet the ten day requirement for the meeting?
Ms. Burns: It does. The deadline  for the papers  is today at 2:00 p.m.  As long as we get them the ad in the next couple of hours we can advertise before, it just has to run next Friday.
Mr. Deane: My question is what if there is changes to the interlocal agreement the way we have it written? This Board has to vote on it before it can, before the joint meeting.

Mr. d'Adesky: I know that Jill said this, but to be very clear, the person is not delegated with authority to finalize or to execute or to approve simply to negotiate it. It would have to be brought back. Some of the changes that have been proposed may be significant, but those would have to be brought back to the Board and considered.
Mr. Deane: So, do we have to meet prior to the 3t h  ?
Ms. Burns: You don't unless you wish to. We could continue this again but if we have a form of agreement to present at the 3th    both Boards as we did in previous meetings would have separate motions to approve that. To the extent one Board or the other didn't want to approve the form of agreement  that was provided  you would  just vote against  it at that time. We don't need to hold a meeting for Lake Ashton II to approve it in their own Board meeting and Lake Ashton to approve it in their own Board meeting and then again jointly. Unless there is a reason to continue this again I think we are just looking at the joint  meeting  on the  3t h    unless  anybody  has  something  that  they think  that  this  Board needs to discuss before then.
Mr. Plummer: I don't want to continue a continued, continued meeting.
Mr. Ference: Does that require a motion to then to adjourn this a gust meeting? Ms. Burns: We have to do public comments and then we can do that.

FOURTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Costello: Do we have any public comments?
Mr. David Price: My name is David Price. Would you explain to me what the interlocal is all about?
Mr. Costello: The interlocal is an agreement between COD I and COD II as far as the purchase and operation of the golf course, however it is going to be maintained, greenspace whatever.
Mr. Price: Thank you.
Mr. Costello: Any other public comment? Before we leave I want to read a note that I got. It says "Dear COD I, Thank you so much for dedicating in the media center in Murray's memory. It would have meant the world to him to have been recognized for his service to the Lake Ashton community. Our family is most grateful for your thoughtfulness. Sincerely, Linda Zacharia." Ok Bob.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	ChairmanNice Chairman

LAKE ASHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ENGINEERING PROPOSAL SCREENING FORM

	1.) Familiarity With Project	2.) Prior District Experience	3.) Staffing - Ability of Personnel	4.) Work Load, Location, Ability to Meet Time &
Budget Requirements	Overall Score (sum of 1 thru 5)	
Weight Factor	30	20	30	20	100	
	Rank/Score	Rank/Score	Rank/Score	Rank/Score	Total Score/Overall Ranking	
						
DewberryEngineers, Inc.						
						
Rayl Engineering & Surveying, LLC						

						
Example	30	20	30	20	100	

						

Directions: Rank each category on a scale not to exceed the weight factor, see example. Sum scores from each category 1 thru 5.
The firm with the highest total would be ranked #1, second highest total ranked# 2, etc.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

ENGINEERING SERVICES
(
Lake Ashton Community Development District

OCTOBER 25, 2019

Dewberry Engineers Inc, 800 N. Magn olia Ave, Suite 1000
Orlando, FL 32803
407.843.5120
407.649.8664 fax
www .dewberry.com

October 25, 2019

Governmental Management Services - Central Florida , LLC Attn: Jill Bu rns, District Manager
5385 North Nob Hill Road Sunrise, Florida 33351

RE: Request for Qualifications for Engineering Services for the Lake Ashton Commun ity Development District

Dear Ms. Burns,

Our firm has put together a strong , focused and experienced team with the knowledge and understanding of the District's facilities . As the current District Engineer for Lake Ashton COD, we will cont inue to deliver each task under this contract efficiently and effectively and value our working relationship with the District. Dewberry also serves as the District Engineer for over 25 Community Development Districts (CDDs) in Flori da, which demonstrates our unique experience, familiarity, and understanding of the type of services that will be requested under this contract.
Dewberry's Florida operation is backed by the resources and stabi lity of a national firm and specializes in site /civil, environmental , utility Infrastructure, transportation engineering, surveying, and land development ser vices. Dewberry has 15 office locations and over 300 emp loyees in Florida, allowing us to continue bringing expertise, qualifications, and resources to the District throughout the State. Dewberry's depth of professional resources and expertise touches every aspect of the CDD's ongoing needs. From 200 acres to close to 10,000 acres, we offer the COD a solid team built on past expe rience to efficiently address the associated scope of work, as well as, the added depth of services involving engineering, environmental , survey ing, and construction management for a full service approach.
We have extensive knowledge and understanding of the Lake Ashton COD, its infrastructure, and facilities and will continue to provide the specific assignments noted in your RFO.
It would be our privilege to continue serving as the District Engineer. We appreciate this opportunity to provide information about our capabi lities and welcome the possibility to persona lly expand upon them ,
Sincerely
Rey Malave, PE
Associate Vice President
321.354.9656 I rma lave@d ewberry.com

PAGE10F1
S

CONTRACT INFORM ATION
TITLE AND LOCATION (Cily;;nd Sl ;;le /

Request for Qualifications for Engineering Services for Lake Ashton COD (Polk County , FL)
PUBLIC NOTIC E DATE
September 17, 2019
SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER
N/A

ARCH ITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT

NAME AND TITLE
Rey Malave, PE, Associat e Vice Pres id ent
NAME OF FIRM
Dewb erry Engineers Inc.
TELEPHONE NUMBER
321.354.9656

FAX NUMBER
407.649 .8664

EMAIL ADDRE SS
rmala ve@d ewberry.com

PROPOSED TEAM
(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)

	(Check)	
9. FIRM NAME	
10. ADDRES S	
11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT			
	w
Cnl'..	°uJ'
>Z
...'.1,C-l-'.
if.	Z0',o°- '
Uu
(D  <(
:::>o::
C/lf--				

a.	

X			Dewberry Engineers Inc.

[K] CHECI< IF BRANCH OFFICE	800 North Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1000
Orla ndo, FL 32803	Distri ct Eng in eer; Assistant
Distri ct Engin eer; Transportation; Stormwate r Management; Wat er/ Wastewat er ; Environmental Permitting ; Surveying  and Mapping ; Landscap e Architecture/ Planning ; Con stru ction
Admini strat ion	

ORGAN IZATIONAL  CHART  OF PROPOSED  TEAM	[Kl (A /tac/Jed)

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM

LAKE ASHTON COD

DISTRICT MANAGER

Jill Burns
DISTRICT ENGINEER	ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER

Rey Malave, PE	Nicole Stalder, PE, LEED AP

Transportation
Joe Keezel, PE
Sr. Roadway Engineer
Marybeth Morin, PE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Stormwater Management
Sean Carrigan, PE
Sr. Stormwater Engineer
Utilities
Bobby Johnson, PE
Sr. Uti lity Engineer
Environmental/Permitting
Nicole Gough, Pws
Sr. Environmental Scientist

Surv y/M pJ>in Bill Donley, PSM Survey Manager

Michael Urchuk, RLA
Sr. Landsca pe Ar chitect
Sarah Maier
GIS Technician/Planner
Construction Adrninistn 1011
Peter Armans, PE
Constr uction Inspector

"OUR TEAM'S EXPERIENCE AND COMMITMENT WILL PROVIDE LAKE ASHTON COD WITH THE CONS l STENT, QUALlTY SERV ICES REQUIRED TO SUCCESSFULLY SERVE
THIS CONTRACT"
- REY MALA VE, PE
DISTRICT ENGIN EER

12. NAME
Rey Malave, PE	13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

District Engineer	14 . YEARS EXPERIENCE		
		a	, TOTAL	b WITH CURRENT FIRM	
		41	40		
15 . FIRM NAME AND LOCATlml (City and Stale}
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Orlando. FL)
MBA/Business Administration; BS/Civil Engineering	FL Professional Engineer #31588

Re y Malave, Associate Vice Pres ident at Dewberry , has 41 years of experience in crvil engineering design, and a diversi fied background in the design and permitting of infrastructure systems, including airports, golf courses, comm ercial developments, and industrial developments , as well as being District Engineer for over 25 CDD's and Improvement Districts . His areas of expertise include stormwater management systems, water distribution systems and wastewater facilitie s, effluent disposal systems, sanitary sewage collection systems, mass grading of sites, and Master Community Development. He also has experience in the design ,
pe rmitting and management of construction administ rative efforts for very large developments. Additionally, he is experienced in the preparation of paving and grading plans for roadways and parking facilities. He has managed and participat ed in the planning and design of nine major Developments of Regional Impact as well as many large and complex projects ranging from 1,600 AC to over 4,500 AC. He has extensive knowledge of permitting requirements and has deve loped a rapport with permitting agencies, including the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (F DEP), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Flori da Water Management Districts, and other local agencies.

19  RELEVANT PROJECTS
('I) TITLE AND LOCATION /City aod State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Lake Ashton COD (Lake Wales, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION (ii applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (B1ief scope. size. cost, elc) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check 11 projecl performed with current firm
District Engineer. As District Engin eer, we've provided numerous services to the Lake Ashton CDD, including conservation
areas (wetlands), retentions ponds and lakes, infrastructure roadways, sewer, water and stormwat er and drainage systems, landscaping , golf course and recrea tional  "clubhouse" facilities. We've also provided consulting engineering services to the CDD Board, including roadway analysis and maintenance rep air priorities, construction cost estimates and coordination of a roadway repair and Improvement program for all the roads within the CDD, review and inspection program for the stormwater management system for compliance and maintenance of the lak e and ponds system serving the community, and coordinated the review, inspection and analysis of roadway determ ination around utility manholes for possible repair.
TITLE AND LOCATION /City and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Dowden  West COD (Orlando, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION /If applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION /Briel scope, size. cost, e/c.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Cl1ecK If project performed with current firm
District Engineer. Dowd en West is a 736-acre master plann ed, residential community, consisting of 1,446 residential units and divided into 10 villages. As District Engineer, our servic es includ e water distribution, sanitary sewer collection, and reuse water distribution systems, stormwater management , environmental/permitting, landscape arc hitecture, roadwa y improveme nts, and survey.
('I) TITLE AND LOCATION /City and Slate)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Covington Park COD (Hill sbo rough County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (tfapplicab/e)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTIO I (Brief scope, size, COS / , e/c.) AND SPE CIFIC ROLE	X I Check if projecl performed with currenl firm
District Engineer. As Distric t Engineer, our services include planning, civil engineering, roadwa y desig n, stormwater design, environmenta l/p ermi tting, landscape architecture, survey, and construction administration.
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Slate)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Lakewood Ranch CDDs 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Manatee  County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION /If applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briel scope, size, cost. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If project performed will1 current firm
District Engineer. Lakewood Ra nch is an unincorporated 17,50 0-acr e community in Manatee County. Established in 1995 ,
d.	there is an 8,500-acre master planned community with in it, consisting of seven villages with a variety of housing types and five CDDs. It contains A-rated schools , shopping, business parks , hospital and medical center, three different golf
courses, as well as, an athletic center with fitness, aquatics and light ed tennis courts. Lakewood Ran ch has over 150 miles of sidewalks and trail, community parks, lakes and nature prese rves abundant with native wildlife. As District Engineer, our services includ e engineering, planning, surveying, permitting, landscape architecture, owner coordination with City/County, and approval of all development and construction activities.

.

Dewberry Engin eers inc. (Orlando , FL)
16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specia/izalion)
BS/C ivil and Environmental Engin eerin g

17 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRA TION (State and Discipline)
FL Profession al Engin eer //6 4720; LEED Accredited Professional

Nicole Stalder, Assoc iate Vice Pr esident with Dew berry, has over 17 years of varied exp erience in public and private design , water distr ibut ion and sewer collection/transmission systems, and proj ect reviews for various agencies. Nicole has a prov en track record for meeting budg ets and schedules on comple x and short time fram e design projects. She is known for her abi lity to quickly adapt to changing schedules, design paramet ers and client needs.

19  RELEVANT PROJECTS
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Dowden West CDD (Orla ndo, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION /II appltc,at le)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.J AN□ SPECIF IC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with current firm
Assistant District Engineer. Dowden West is a 7 36-acr e maste r planned, residentia l commu nity, consisti ng of 1,446 resid ential units and divided into 10 villages. As District En gineer, our services include wate r distribution, sanitar y sewer collection, and reuse water distribution system s, stormwater management, environmental/permi tting , landscap e architecture , roadway improvements, and survey,
TITE AND LOCATION (City and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPL ETED
Live Oak Lake CDD (Twin Lakes Development)  (Osceola County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CON	STRUCTION (If applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTIO N (Brref scope , size. cost. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I C he ck If project pe,io rmed wrt11 current firm
Project Manager. Live Oak Lake COD Is a multi-phase d ac tive adult community consisting of residential units, green open
space tracts with commu nity facilities , and a community amenity center located jus t off of Live Oak Lake. Pha ses 1 - 8 consists of a mix of 50', 70' and duplex units totaling 2,023 units. Dewberry's  service s include  entitlements, planning, survey ing, site/civil engineering, roadway design, bridg e design, signal design, environmental/permitt ing , landscape/ hardscape design, assista nce with the City master ups/zing agreeme nts, and construction administratio n.
T ITLE AND LOCATION(City and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Osceola Chain of Lakes CDD (Osceola County , FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (II applicable/
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briel scope. size. cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with current firm
Assistant District Engineer . As District Engin eer, Dewberry's services include storm water manag ement system design ; water and sewer system de sign, roadway design , landscaping, recreat io nal fac iliti es, street lighting, and engineering contrac t man ag ement and inspection ser vic es during construction.
(i)  TITLE AND LOCATION /City and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
VillaSol CDD (Osceola County, FL)	PR OFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION /If applicab le)
Ongoing	NI A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION  (Btiel scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if projecl performed with curr ent firm
Assistant District Engineer. As District En gineer, Dewberr y's services include stormwater manag ement system design; water and sewe r system design , roadway design, lan dscaping, recreational facilities, stree t lighting, and engineering contract manageme nt and inspection services durin g construct ion.
TITLE AND LOCATION (City a/Id State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Covington  Park CDD (Hi llsborough County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
Ongo ing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRI PTION (Bnef scope, size, cost. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with curren t firm
Assistant District Engineer. As District Engi neer, our services incl ude planning , civil engineering, road way design, storm wat er de sign, enviro n.mental/permi tting, landscape archi tecture, survey, and constr uction adm inist ration .

.	,

15 . FIRM NAME AND LOCATION /City and State)
Dewberry Engin eers Inc. (Orlando, FL)
16. EDUCATION (Degree and Speclalizahon)
BS/ En viro nmental Engin eering

17- CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGIS TR ATION (State and Disciplin e)
FL Prof essio nal Enginee r #57501

Joe Keeze l has more than 23 years of experien ce designing major transportat ion systems and thorou ghfares, working primarily on FOOT pro jects. He has managed seve ra l major highway projects, in cluding a capacity project that widened a rural four-l an e sta te highway to an urban six-lane sect ion; rep lac ed  twin  bridg es; and  updated  dra inage, signing , paveme nt markings, and signals. He was project manage r for two district-wide contracts and prepared construction  docum ents  for  more  than 10 resurfa ci ng, restoration and re habilit ati on project s rangi ng from 2-lan e rural to multi-lane urban. Joe also prepared several designs with limited surv ey using as-built plans, right -of-way maps and SLD's, as well as prepared severa l projects with SMART plan s and letter sets all of which have been construct ed with no claims.

19  RELEVANT PROJECTS			

a.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (Ci/y and Stale)
Continuing Engineering Services - Roadway Design (FDOT, District Five)	(2) YEAR COMP LETED
P ROFESSIONA L SERVICES	I CO NSTRUCTlm l (If applicable)	
		
2019	Ongoing	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Bn·er scope, size. cos/. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project per/orn,ed with current finn	
	Project Manager . Through our continuing servic es contrac t with District Five, Dewberry's task work orders includ e intersectio n improvements, resurfa cing, lighting, signalizat ion, and all tasks associat e d witl1 highway design proj ects. Our traffic design services inc lude signing desig n, pavement mar king design, signal warr ant analys is, signaliz ation desig n,
lig htin g justific ation , lighting design and traffic studi es. Joe is currently serving as Proj ec t Manager for the following projects:
. State Road A1A at State Road 520 Intersection Improvement s, Brevard County, FL - The primary intent of the project
is to impro ve the inters ection for pedestrians and northbound left turning motorists by removing the free flo w right turn
lan es, realig ning the east app roach and ext e nd in g the nort hbound dual left turn lanes at the intersection of State Road A1A and State Road 520 in accord an ce with PPM Vol I Chapter  25.  Also includ ed  in the project is the extension of the exi stin g northbound left turn lane at the intersection of State Roa d A1A and Canav eral Plaza Boulevard (Marion Lan e).
State Road 5 at Matanzas Woods Parkway, Flagler County, FL - Thi s project involves the design of a multi-lane roundabout at the intersection of State Road 5 (US 1) and Matan zas Woods Parkway. The project also includes updating pedestri an features at the intersection.
Dallas Pond Re-Design, Marion County, FL - The primary intent of the projec t is to re-design the existing pond that is curr ently out of complianc e for water quality treatment. Also included in the project is th e extension of the outfall and acquisition of drainage easements for future maintenance of the comp lete drainage system.
State Road 472, Volusia County , FL - The purpose of the project is to rehabilitate the asphalt pavement to extend the longev ity of the roadway. The Intent of the project is to mill an d resurface the roadway, including necessary ro ads ide improvement s, in accordance with PPM Vol I Chapte r 25 . The project Is loca ted in Volusia County on State Road 472 from MP 0.376 to 2.931. The limits of th e project include the State Road 15 lnt erchang.e ramps.		

b.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
General Engineering Consultant (Central Florida Expres sway Authority (CFX))	(2) YEAR COMP LETED
PROFESSION AL SERV ICES	I CONSTRUCTION /tf applica11/e)	
		
Ongoing	N/A	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (B!iel scope, size. cost, etc.) A ND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project pe rfarn,ed with current firm	
	Senior Roadway Engineer . Dewberry currently serves as a general engineering consult ant to the CFX. In ord er to support the delive ry of CFX's $1.36 billion, five-year work plan, the scope of servic es that Dewberry is performing as the general engineering consultant are c_ategorized into seven tasks: bond financing support  , engineering/design  support, pl anning support , maint enance program support, general plan ning, work plan support, and multimodal/ translt s uppor t.		

C.	(1) TITL E AND LOCATIO N (City and Slate)
1-4 Beyond the Ultimate, Segment 5 (FOOT, District One, Polk County, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPL ETED
PROFESSI ONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION /II applicable)	
		
Ong oing	Ongoin g	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size. cost, e/c.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project per/ornied with current firm	
	Lead Roadway Engineer. This segme nt is a 4.5-mil e section from West of Stat e Road 25/U S 2 7 to west of County Road 532 (Polk /Osceola County Line) in Polk County, including the US 27 interchange. The proposed 1-4/ US 27 interchange is a fu ll service partial cloverlea f interchange with  loop ramps in the northwest and southeast  quad rants. Ele ven new  bri dges, swb stanti al modifications to the ramp terminal int ersec tions and improvements along US 27 are proposed with this proj ect.		

(Complete one Section  E for each key person)

12. NAME

Marybeth Morin, PE	13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

Senior Str uctural Eng ineer	14. YEARS EXPERIENCE	
		a. TOTAL	b WITH CURRENT FIRM
23	21	
15	. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (Cily and Slate)		
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Orlando, FL)
BS/Civil Engi neering	FL Professional Engineer #57547

Marybeth Morin, Sen ior Structural Engineer , has  23 years  of experience in struc tural design of transportat io n structures . Marybeth is respo nsibl e for the design and plans production of projects from the preliminary stages to fi nal de sign. These  projects  include minor grade separations, water crossings and interchanges. She has experience in AASHTO and Florida I-Beam girders, precast­
prestressed slab units and stee l I-g ir ders. She also has experienc e in alt ernatives development, design-build work and miscellaneous structur es. Miscellaneous structures include sign structure, mast arm, noise, buffer an d retaining wall, box culvert and strain pole foundation design. Marybeth is responsible for project design, coord ination and plans production.

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS
I
2019	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briel scop,e size, cos/, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed wi1h current firm
Senior Structural Engineer. Live Oak Lake COD is a multi-phased, active ad ult community consisting of residential units, green open space tracts with commu nity facilities, and a community amen ity center . Marybeth was respo nsible for the design and overseeing the construction of the vehicu lar bridge that crosses existing Bullis Road, connect ing the northern pool and amenity area with the remainder of the development The bridge is a single span FIB-36 with spread footing, which reduces vibrat ion and cost, MSE walls with conc rete drainage ditch, and splash pads for run off. The bridge utilizes a custom railin g with stone veneer, architect ural finishes, and custom planters for a high level aesthet ic result
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Wekiva  Parkway  (CFX, Orange County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION /If applicable)
2015	2017
(3) BRIEF DESCR IPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check ii project performed wilh current firm
Senior Structural Engineer. The Wekiva Parkway (SR 429) is a new alignment, high speed, limited access facility in northwest Orange County. Segment 203 extends from just nort h of Ponkan Road to north of Kelly Park Road, a distance of
app roximate l y 2.2 miles. The project includes bridg e structures over the Lake Victor floodplain , a future access road and Kelly Park Road. A partial cloverleaf interchange will be provided at Ke ll y Park Road. The project includes modifications to several local arterials and off-site stormwater management faci lities.
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Slate)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Suncoast  Parkway  2, Section  2 (FOOT, Turnpike Enterprise, Citru s	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION (II applicable)
County, FL}	2016	Est 2019
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (B1iel scope, size , cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X J Check if project performed with current rrrm
C.	Senior Structu ral Engineer. This section of the Suncoast Parkway 2 Project is for the design of a n ew roadway and is
located from south of Grover Cleveland Boulevard to north of County Road 486, for a distance of app roximate ly 8.5 miles. Thi s new alignment project includ es a major intersection and severa l county road crossings; traversing through heavy wooded areas, borrow pits, and subdivisions, Responsible for bridge design and plans produetion.
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City a,id Slate)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
State Road 20  over  Chipola  River  Bridge (FOOT, District 3, Calhoun	PROFESSIONAL SERV ICES	CONSTRUCTION (IIapptlcable)
County, FL)	2010	2015
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION ( Briel scope, size, cos/, e tc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If project performed with currenl firm
Senior Structural Engineer. This project involves the design of the rep lacemen t for th e existing SR 20 bridge over Chipola
d .	River in Calhoun County. The existing briclge, constructed in 1941. is structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.
The replacement structure will have fewer spans than the existing stru cture to expedite construct ion and improve the waterway. The bridge is located in an enviro nmentally sensitive area with two protected species known to exist within the project limits. A permanent shifted alignment for the new bridge, as well as the use of a te mpo rary bridge st ructu re, was investigated for maintenance of trqffic during constructlon .

(Complete one Section  E tor each key person)

1 2. NAME

Sea n Carrigan, PE	13. ROLE INTH IS CONTRACT

Senior Stormwat er Engin eer	14	. YEARS EXPERIENCE	
		a. TO TAL	b. Vv1TH CURRENT FIRM
13		
15, FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (CUy and State/
Dewberry Eng ineers Inc. (Orlando, FL)
BS/Civil Engin eering	FL Prof essional Engineer #73041

Sean Carri gan, Senior Drainage Engineer, has 13 years of experience in roadway drainag e design, including erosion control, enviro n mental permitting and PD&E studies on various roadway proj ects for FDOT, as well as, municipal gove rnment clients throughout Florida. Sean's key expertise is in the design of open and closed drainag e collect ion systems, culvert s and stormwater
managem ent facilities,  performing hydrologi cal/hydraulic  analysis for the design  and co nstr uction of transportation  project s, assisting in the coord in ation and compiling of environmental p er mitting appli cation s for the appro val  by  permi tting  ag encies.  He is skilled in the utilization of MicroStation , ASAD, ICPR, PONDS Modeling, Hy-8, HEC-RAS , GeoHEC-RAS , Culvert Service Life Est im ator, Win­ TR55, GeoPak Dra inage, Corrid or Modeling, BMPTRAINS , Bluebeam and Microsoft Office.

19  RELEVANT PROJECTS
TITLE AND LOCATION /City and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
State Road 5 at Matanzas Woods Parkway (FOOT, District Five , Flagler  PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
County, FL)	2019	Ongoing
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTI ON (Brief scope. size. cos/. elc.) AND SPECIFICROLE	X I Check If project performed Wilh current firm
Senior  Drainage  Engineer. Through  our continuing services contract  with District  Five , this project  involves the design  of  a multi-lane round abo ut at the intersection of Stat e Road 5 (US 1) and Matanzas Wood s Parkway. The project also includ es upd ating pedestri an featur es at the Intersec tion .
TITLE AND LOCATION /City and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLE TED
State Road A1A at State Road 520  Intersection Improvements, (FOOT,   PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION  /If applicable)
Di strict Five, Brevard County, FL)	2019	Ongo ing
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, sizf'!, cost, erc.)AND SPE CIFIC ROLE	X J Cl1ecltIf project perfom1ed with current finn
Senior Drainage Engineer. Through our continuing services contract with District Five, the primary intent of this project is to improve the interse ction for pedestrians and northbound left turning motori sts by removing the free flo w right turn
lanes, realign ing the east approach and extending the nort hbound dual left turn lanes at the intersec tion of Stat e Road A1A and State Road 520 in acc ordance wit h PPM Vol I Ch apte r 25. Also included in the project is the extension of the exist ing northbound left turn lane at the intersection of State Roa d A1A and Canave ral Plaza Boulevard (Marion Lan e).
TITl E ANO LOCATION (City a!ld State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
10th Avenue Complete Streets Feasibility and PD&E Study (FOOT,	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUC TION /If applicable/
Distri ct One, Manat ee County, FL)	Ongoing	N/ A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope , size, cos/, elc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If project perfonned with currenl finn
C.		Senior Drainage Engineer. This study develops and evalu ates complete street improvements along 10th Avenue from Ri verside Drive to 17th Str eet West in the City of Palm et to to enhance multimodal mobil ity alon g the corrid or. The
app roximately 1.1-mile study proposes comp lete street appli cations such as wider sidewalks, bicycle lanes, multimodal paths , enhanced transit amen ities, reconfigured on-street parking, traffic calming measures, streetscapin g aesthet ics, and stormwater control features.
( 1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
State Road 436 Milling and Resurfacing (FOOT, District Five, Serni no le PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION (II applicable)
Cou nty, FL)	Ongoing	2019
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with currenl firm
Senior Drainage Engineer. This project involves adding proposed dual left turn lanes at th e interse ction of SR 4 36 and Ronald Reagan Boulevard. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow, safety and mobilit y at th e intersection .
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
1-4 Beyond the Ultimate, Segment  5 (FOOT, District One, Polk County,	PRO FESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION /If applicable/
F L)	Ongoing	Ongoing
(3) BRIEF DESCRIP TION (Brief scope, site, cost, etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with current firm
Senior Drainage Engineer . The 1-4 Beyond the Ultimate Segment 5 is a 4.5-mile  section  of 1 -4 from West of State Road 25 /US 27 to west of County Road 532 (Polk/Osceola County Line) in Polk County, including the US 27 Interchange. The
proposed 1-4/ US 27 interchange  is a full service paI1ial cloverleaf interc hange  with loop ramps in the north west and
sout heast quadra nts. El even new bridges, substantial modi ficatio ns to the ramp terminal intersections and improvements along US 27 are proposed with thi s project.

12
.	.

15.
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Orlando, FL)
BS/Civi l Engineering	FL Professional En gineer #77677

Bobby Johnson has 14 years of varied  land development experie nce in both res idential and commercial d esig n. As a pro ject engineer, Bobb y's res ponsibilities include the design of stormwa t er manag ement and co llectio n systems, water dist ributio n systems, sanitary co llection/transmission systems, gradin g, drainag e modeling, and permitting. Addi tio nally, he is sl<l i l ed in the use of such
compute r programs as MicroStatio n, Adl CPR, StormCAD, WaterCAD, and other soft ware used in the design and mode ling of pr ojects. He is very familiar with Central Florid a regulatory agencies and the St. Johns River Wat er Management District 's (SJRWMD) p ermitting processes

19  RELEVANT PROJECTS
TITLE AND LOCATION (Cl/y and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Dowden West  COD (Orlando, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION (If applicable}
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, si,ze cosl, etc) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with current Orm
Project Engineer. Dowden West is a 736 -acre master planned, reside ntial community, consisting of 1,446 resid ential units
and divided into 10 villages. As District Engineer, our services include wate r distribution, sanitary sewer collection, and reuse water distribution systems, stormwater management, environmental/pe rm itting, landscap e architecture, roadway improvements, and survey.
-	(1) TITL E AND LOCATION (C/ly and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Cascades  PUD/CDD (Groveland, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION /If app/lcable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size cost. etc.) ANO SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if projecl performed with current flrm
Project Engineer. Cascades at Groveland is a 751.9-acre master planned, residential community with 999 single -family
un its, an Am enity Center and a Horticu ltu ral Center.  Dewberry  obtained entitlements and approvals for the  infrastruct  ure, mass grading and the fina l construction of the project which is div ided in 5 phases. We also worked with Lal<e County by designing and coordinating the app roval of the North-South Road to serve as a main connector road for the area. Work also included the design and permi tting of both the water lin e  to service  the project and the sewer forc e main fo r  connectio  n to the City facilities.
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Lakewood Ranch CDDs 1,  2, 4, 5, and 6 (Manat ee County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION (ff applica ble)
Ongoi ng	NIA
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief sc-ope, size. cost. etc.} AND SPECIFICROLE	X I Check if p refect performed Willi current n,m
Project Engineer. Lakewood Ranch is an uninco rporate d 17,500-acre community in Manatee Coun ty. Established In 199 5,
ther e is an 8,500-acre maste r plan ned community within It, consisting of seve n villages with a variety of h ousing types and five CDDs. It contains A-rated schools, shopping, business parks, hos p ita l and medical center, three different golf
cou rses, as we ll as, an athl etic center with fit ness, aq uatics and lighted tennis courts. Lakewood Ra n ch has over 150 miles of sidewalks and trail, community parks, lakes and nature preserves abun dant with nati ve wildlife. As District Engineer, our se rvices in clude engineerin g, pl anning, surveyin g, permitting, lan dscape archit ecture, owner coordinat ion with City /County, an d approva l of all deve lopment and constr uction activities.
TITLE AND LOCATION (Cityancl State)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Mon tecito COD (Brevard Co unty, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (I f applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if project performed with cur1ent nrm
Project Engin eer. Montecito CDD is located in Brevard County in Satellite Beach, Flor ida. This projec t consists of 450 acres containing 749 units. Our services include eng inee ring, surveying and construction administra tion for the CDD.

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. s1201s) PAGE 8

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Complete one Section  E for each  key person.)

12 NAME

Nico le Gough, PWS	13 ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

Sen ior Envi ronmental Scientist	14 YEARS EXPERIENCE	
		a TOTAL	b WITH CURRENT FIRM
22	4	
15	. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (Ct(yand State)		
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Orlando , FL)
Nicole Gough , Environ mental Manager, has 22 years of exp e rience in project mana gement re lated to ecological evalu atio n, planning , p er mitting and oversight of regional transportatio n and infras tru ct ure projects, large agri cultural proj ects, and land development.
Nicole previou sly served as a wetla nd s biologist and regulatory reviewer for both the SFWMD and SJRWMD. Whil e worki ng with both private and public en tit ies, Ni cole has garnered extensive permitting experience in all aspects of federal, state. and local p ermi tting, including Nationa l Po llutant Discharge Eli mination System (NPDES) . Addi tional  expe rtis e includes  th reatened and endangered species surveys, wetland deter minations, biol ogy , botany, conservation  biology, ecology,  emergency  manage  ment, Endangered Species Act compliance for Letter of Map Re vision/Conditional Letter of Map Re vision, Geographi c Informatio n Systems (GIS) data collection and mappi ng , pr eparation of technic al spec ifications and co nt ract documents and stakeho lder coordinati on/faci litatio n.

19  RELEVANT PROJECTS					

a.	(1) TIT LE AND LOCATION (Clly and Slate )
Lake Ashton COD (Lak e Wales, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION /If applicable)			
		
Ongoing	
N/A		
	(3) BRIEF DESCR I PTION(Brief scope, size, cost, etc / AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If project p erformed wllh current firm			
	Environmental Scientist. As District Engin eer, we've provided numerous services to the Lak e Ashton CDD associated  with the development of neighborhood environments, includin g conservation  areas (w et(and s), retentions  pond s  and  lak es, infras tructur e roadwa ys, sewe r, wat er and stormwater and drain age systems, landscaping, golf course and recreat ion al "clubhous e'' faci lities.				

b.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and sta te!
Lakewood Ranch CDDs 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 (Man atee County, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION /IIapplic able)			
		
Ongoing	
N/A		
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPT ION (Bnef scope. size. cost. etc./ AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check if proIacl performed wilt, currenl firm			
	Environmenta l Scientist. Lakewood Ranch Is an uninco rporated 17,500-acre community in Manatee County. Established in 1995, there Is an 8,500 -acre master planned community within it, consisting of seven villages with a variety of housing
types and five CDDs. It contains A-rated schools, shoppi ng, business parks , ho spital and medical center, three different golf courses, as well as, an athletic ce nter with  fitness,  aq uatics  and lighted  tennis courts. Lakewood  Ranch has ove r 150 miles of sidewa lks and trail, community parks, lakes and nat ure preserves abu nd ant with native wildllfe. As Distrfct Engineer, our services include engineeri ng, planning, surveying , perm itting , landscape architecture, owner  coordi nation  with  City /County, an d approval of all develo pment and constru ction act ivities.				

C.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (Cit y and Stale)
Live Oak Lake COD (Twin Lakes Development) (Osceola County, FL}	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUC TION (If applicable)			
		
Ongoing	
NIA		
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scop,	e	size , cost , etc) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Chee!< if project per1or,ned with cui'reI11firm	
	Environmental Scientist. Live Oak Lak e CDD is a multi-phased active adult co mmunity con sisting of residential units, green open space tracts with community fac ilities, and a com munity amenity center located just off of Live Oal< Lake. Pha ses
1 - 8 consists of a mix of 50', 70' and duplex units totaling 2,023 units. Dew berry's services include entitlements, planning, surveying, site/civil engineering , roadway design, bri dge design, signal design, environmental/p ermittin g, landscape/ hardscape d es ign , assistance with the City master upsi zing ag re ements, and constructio n administration.				

d.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION /City and Slate/
Montecito COD (Breva rd County, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (II applicable/			
		
Ongoing	
N/A		
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIP TION (Brief scope. size. cos(. etc.) AND SPECIFICROLE	X I Check if pr0ject performed wilh current firm			
	Environmental Scientist. Montecito CDD consists of 450 ac res containing 749 units. Our services includ e engineering, environmen tal, surveying and construct ion adm inistr atio n,				

12 NAME

Bill Donley, PSM	13 ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

Survey Manager	14 YEARS EXPERIENCE	
		a. TOTAL	b WITH CURRENT FIRM
38	19	
15	. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)		
Dewberry Enginee rs Inc. (Orl ando, FL)
BS/Finance	FL Professional Surveyor and Mapper #53 81

Bill Donl ey, Associate Vice President  of Surv eying and Mapping  at Dewb erry,  has 38 years of exp er ience in the surv eying and mapping ar ena. Bill has succ essfully completed control surveys, design an d right-of-way surveys and mapping, utility designation, excavatio n and utility mapping projects as well as hydrog raphic and mean high wat er surveys th roughout the  state. He has  managed over 200 public and private roadway projects , design build endeavors and continuing service contracts.

TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Scace)

YEAR COMPLETED
Lake Ashton COD (Lake Wales, FL)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Ongoing
CONSTRUCTION (II applicable)
N/A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope. sk e, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X Clleck tt projecl performed wilh currenl firm
Survey Manager , As District Eng in eer, we've prov ided numerous services to the Lake Ashto n COD assoc iated with
the development of neighborhood environments, includ ing conservation areas (we tlands), retentions pond s and lakes, infrastructure roadways, sewer, water and stormwater and drainag e systems, landsc aping, go lf course and recreatio nal "clubhouse " facilities.

) TITLE AND LOCATION (Ci ty and Stale)

(21 YEAR COMPLETED
Dowden West CDD (Orlando , FL)
PROFESSOI NAL SERVICES
Ongoing
CONSTRUCTION {If app/lcable)
N/A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, e/c.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X Check If projecl performed with current firrn
b,	Survey Manager. Dowden West is a 736-ac re mas ter p la nned, res identi al community , consis tin g of 1,446 reside ntial units and divided Into 10 villages. As Dist rict Engineer, our serv ices include water distrib ution, sanit ary sewer collection , and reuse water distrib ution system s, stormwat er managem ent, environmental /pe rmitting, landscape arc hitecture, roadway improvemen ts, and survey.
TITLEAND LOCATION (City and Stale)

YEAR COMPLETED
Live Oak Lake CDD (Twin Lakes Development) (Os ceola County, FL)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Ongo ing
CONSTRUCTION (II applicable)
N/A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Bnef scope. size. cost. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X  Check II project performedwllh current firm
Survey Manager. Live Oak Lake COD is a multi-phase d ac tive adu lt community consisting of residen tial uni ts, green open space tracts with community faciliti es, and a community ame nity cen ter located just off of Live Oak Lake. Phases 1 - 8
consists of a mix of 50', 70 ' and duplex units tot aling 2,023 units. Dewberry's services include entitlements, planni ng, surveying, site/civil engineering, roadway design, bridge design, signa l design, environmental/per mitting, landscape/ hard scape design, assistance with the Cit y master upsizing ag ree ment s, and cons tr uction adm inis tration ,

TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)

YEAR COMPLETED
Country Greens CDD (Sorrento Spring s PD) (Sorrento, FL)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Ongo ing
CONSTRUCTION(If applicable)
NIA
BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size. cos/, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X  Check If projecl performed wlll1 cLIrren1 nrm
Survey Manager. Sorrento Springs is a 680-acre Plan ned Development within the Country Gree ns COD, In Sorrento,
Lake County , Flo rid a. Developed by Hewitt Pr operties, Inc., the project contained 678 single-family lots, and an 18-hole
d.	golf course and clubhouse facilities. The Count ry Greens COD encompasses the entire 680 acres , and will co nstruct ,
operate and maintain infrastructur e to support the Sorr ento Hills comm unity. Our firm provided the Mast er Planning for the community which Included the developm ent of all "green area s" tied to the golf course and clu bhouse. We d eveloped a Commun ity Park area that provided the entire Village a poo l area and rustic style centered community building. As the CDD Engi n eer, our services included engineering, planni ng, sur veying , permi tting, land scape architecture, owner coordi nation with City of Eu stis and Lake County, and approva l of all deve lopment and construct ion activi ties.

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME

Michael Urchuk, RLA	13, ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

Senior Landscape Architect	14. YEARS EXPERIENCE	
		a, TOTAL	b, WITH CURRENT FIRM
29	3	
15, FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (Ci!yand State)
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Orla ndo, FL)
16, EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization)
BS/ Landscape Architecture

17 . CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Disciplli1e)
FL Registered Landscape Architect #LA6666675

'1 8 OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUA LIFICATIONS (Pttblicalions, O,ganiza/ions, 7J-alning, Awards, etc.)

Michael Urchuk, Senior La ndscap e Architect , has 29 years of experience and has a varied bac kground in landscape  architecture and planning. As a project manager, he is responsible for coordination across design disciplines and Bets as a liaison between the owner, design team and contractor. He is also responsible for coordinating design efforts and project submittals . Michael's experience as
a landscape architect Includes retail office, residential, mixed-use, streetscapes and recreational uses as well as hardscap e and irrigation design. Hardscape designs include corporate plazas, streetscapes, fountains, amenity areas for multi-family projects, and urban plazas. Michael also provides construction administration services on multiple levels to include, shop drawing and RFI review. field reports, final punch lists, and on-site project coordination meet ing.

19. RELEVA,N   f'ROJECTS
TITLE ANO LOCATION(City and State}	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Live Oak Lake COD (Twin Lakes Development)  (Osceola County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I C ONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIEF DE SCRIPT ION (Brief scope, si,.e, c os/, e/c.)ANO SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If projecl performed wilh current firm
Landscape Arc hitect. Live Oak Lake CDD (Twin Lakes Development) Is a multi-ph ased active adult community consisting of residential units, green open space tracts with community facilitie s, and a community amenity center located just off of
Live Oak Lake . Phas es 1- 8 consists of a mi x of 50', 70' and duplex units totaling 2,023 units. Dewberry's services include entitlements, planning, surveying, site/civil engineering, roadway design, bridge design, signal design, environmental/ permitting, landseape/ hardscape design, assist ance with the City mast er upsizing agreeme nts, and construction administration.
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
VillaSol CDD (Osceola County, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUC TION (If applicable)
Ongoing	NI A
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPT ION (Brief scope, size  cost, el c.) AN D SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If project performed with current firm
Landscape Architect . As District Engineer, Dewberry's services include sto rmwater management system design; water and sewer system design , roadway design, landscaping, recreational faci lities , street lighting, and engineering contract management and inspection services during construction.
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)	(2) YEAR CO MPLETED
Osceola County Fire Training Facility (Osceola County, FL)	PROFESSIONALSERVICES
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2019	2019
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTIO I  /Brief scope, size, cost. e/c.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check i f project performed with current firm
C.
Landscape Architect. Design of a training facility  for the  Osceola  County  fire department. This new Fire Training  Facility is on approximately 11 acres. Site elements will Include Open Air Training Course, a 9,500 SF fire station with 3 fire bays, Fire station Training Building, Burn Tower and Several Shaded Pavilions.
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)	(2) YEAR COMP LETED
Lancaster  Park East (St Cloud, FL)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTIO N (If app llcable)
Ongoing	NIA
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTIO N (Bne/ scope. size, cost, elc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check If project performed with current firm
Landscape Architect. This proj ect consists of 461 single family units and community facilities. Dewberry was tasked with designing and permitting the site layout, stormwater management facllities, utilities, grading, dra inage , easement vacations, FEMA CLOMR and LOMR ap provals. Dewberry provided planning and entitlements, iandscape/h ards cape de sign , site/civil engineering, and construction administ ration .
TITLE AND LOCATION(City aod Stale)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
Roadway Operations Facility (CFX)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I C ONST RUCTION (If applicable)
Ongoing	N/A
(3) BRIE F DESCRIPTION (Bn'ef scope, size, cos/. e/c.) AND SP.'CIFIC ROLE	X I Check if projecl pertormed with currenl flrm
Landscape Architect. As the General Engineering Consultant to CFX, Dewbe rry provided both architectural and civil engineering services for the CFX Roadway Operations Facility. The new facility includes a 6,500 SF of fice building, fueling station, small vehicle maintenance bays, warehouse, three enclosed storage buildings totaling 23,000 SF, and laydown yard.

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. s1201s) PAGE 11

12. NAME

Sarah Maier	13 ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

GIS Technician/Planner	14. YEARS £XPERIENCE	
		a. TOTAL	b WITH CURRENT FIRM
16	14	
FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)
Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Orlando, FL)
EDUCATION (Degree and Spec/aliiatlon)
BS/Engineering

CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTR ATIO N (State and D1sclpllne/
n /a

OTHER PROFESS IONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications. Organizations, Tr'llin/ng. Awards . etc)

Sarah Maier, Land Use Pla nner at  Dewberr y, has  expe r ience in development  entitlements for a  variety  of land uses and project sizes, including Developments of Reg ional Impact, Comp rehensive Policy Plan Amendments, Zoni ngs, Plan ned Developments, and Concep tu al Land Use Plann ing, Sarah's responsibi liti es have ranged from Policy and Code ame ndments, GIS ana lyses as it pertains to land use planning and growth forecasting , and includes pro jects involving commercial, industrial , residential and mixed uses.

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS			

a	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Live Oak Lake COD (Twin Lakes Development) (Osceola County, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED	
		PROFESSIO IAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCT ION (II applicable)
Ongoing	Ongoing	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Btief scope, srze, cost , etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X [ Check if project performed witl1 current frrm	
	Project Planner/GIS Technician. Live Oak Lake COD (Twin Lakes Development) is a multi-phased active adu lt co mmunity consis tin g of residential units, green open space t racts with commun ity facilities, and a community ame nity center located just off of Liv e Oak Lake. Phases 1 - 8 co nsists of a mix of 50', 70' and duplex units totaling 2,023 units. Dewberry's
serv ices Include entitlement s, p lanning, surveying, sit e/civ il eng inee ri ng, roadway desig n, bridge design, sig nal design, environmental/pe rmitting, landscap e/hardscape design, assistance with the City master upsizing agreemen ts, and construct ion administration .		

b.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Dowden West CDD (Orlando, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIO NAL SERVICES	I CONS TRUCT ION (if app licable)	
		
Ongoing	NIA	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (B riel scope, size. cost. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X I Check II projec t pe1fo nn ed with current firm	
	Project Planner/GIS Technician. Dowden West is a 736 -acre  master planned,  residential  community,  consisting  of 1,446 resid ential units and divided into 10 villages . As Distri ct Engineer, our services Include water distri bution, sanitary sewer col lection, and reuse water distribution systems, stormwater management , environmental/permi tt ing, landscape archi tecture, roadway improvements, and sur vey,		

C.	(1) TITLE.AND LOC TION (City and Stale)
Cascades at Groveland PUD/CDD (Groveland, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PR OFESSIONAL SERVICES	I C ONSTRUCTION (If applicable)	
		
Ongoing	NIA	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cos/, e/c.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X [ Check ii project performed wilh currenl frrm	
	GIS Technician. Cascades at Groveland  is a 751.9-ac re master  planned, residential commun ity  with 999  single-family units, an Ameni ty Cen ter and a Horticultural Center. Dewberry obtain ed entitlements and approva ls for the infras tr ucture, mass grading and the final construct ion of the pro ject which Is divided in 5 phases. We also worked with Lake County by
designing and coordinat ing the approva l of the North-South Ro ad to serve as a main con nector road for tile area, Work also included the desig n and permi tt ing of both the water line to service the project  and til e sewe r for ce  main for  connection  to the City facilities.		

d	('I) TITLE AND LOCATION (CJly anel Slate)
Country Greens CDD (Sorrento Springs PD) {Sorr ento, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PR OFESSIONAL SERVIC ES	I CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)	
		
On goin g	NIA	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope. size, cost. etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROL E	X [ Check If projecl performed with current firm	
	GIS Technician. Sorren to Springs is a 680-acre  Planned Deve lopment  within the Country Green s COD, in So rrento, Lake Cou nty, Florid a. Developed by Hewitt Properties, Inc., th e project conta ined 678 single-family lots, and an 18-hole golf course and clubh ouse facilities. The Cou ntry Greens COD encomp as ses the entire 680 acres , and will constr uct,
operate and maintain infrastructure to support tile Sorrento Hills community. Our firm provided the Master Planning for the community which Included the development of all "green areas" tied to the golf course and clubhou se. We developed a Commu nity Park area that provided the entire Vill age a pool area and rustic style centered com munity building. As til e CDD Engineer, our serv ices included engineering, plan ning, survey ing, permitting, landscape arch itecture, owner coordinat ion with City of Eust is and Lake County, and approval of all development and con struct ion activities,		

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. a1201s) PAGE 12

RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12 . NAME

Peter Armans, PE	'1 3. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

Construction Insp ector	14. YEARS EXPERIENCE		
		a	. TOTAL	b. WITH CURRENT FIRM	
		9	Less than 1		
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)
Dewberry Engin eers Inc. (Orlando, FL)

16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization)
BS/Civil Engi neering	17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)
FL Professional Engineer #87064; OSHA Cons truction Safety 10 Hour; Erosion & Sediment Control Certified	
1B.	OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALi FICATIONS (Pub licat ions, Organizations, Training, Awa1ds, etc.)	
Pet er Armans , Project Engineer, has 9 years of experience in the planning, design , rehabilitation , condition assessment , and construction management of water distribution sys tem s, sewer conveyance systems, and stormwater managem ent systems. He provides oversight and review for various inspection technologies and methodologies and has in-depth exp erience with scoping, budgeting, advertising, and negotiating construction activities and contracts.

19. RELEVANTPROJECTS			

a.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Lake Ashton CDD (Lake Wales, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED	
		PROF ESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCT ION (If applicable/
Ongoing	N/A	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRI PTION (Brie/ scope, size. cost. etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X [ Check If projecl performed wllh currenl nrm	
	Construction Inspector. As District Engineer, we've provid ed numerous services to the Lake Ashton CDD associa ted with the development of neighborhood environments, including conservation areas (wetlands), retentions ponds and lakes, infrastructur e roadw ays, sewer, water and stor mwater and drainag e systems. landscap ing, golf course and recre ational "clubhouse" facilities.		

b.	(1) TITLEAND LOCATION (City and Slate)
Country Greens CDD (Sorrento Springs PD) (So rrento, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)	
		
Ongoing	NIA	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope. size. cos/, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	X [ Check if project performed Wilh currenl firm	
	Construction Inspector. Sorrent o Springs is a 680-acre Planned Deve lopment within the Country Greens CDD, in Sorrento,
Lake County, Florida. Develop ed by Hewitt Prope rt ie s, Inc., th e project contain ed 678 single-family lots, and an 18-hole golf course and clubhouse facilitie s. The Country Greens CDD encompasses the entire 680 acres, and will constru ct, operate and maint ain infrastru cture to support the Sorrento Hills community. Our firm provid ed the Mast er Planning for tl1e community which included the development of all "green areas" ti ed to the golf course and clubhouse. We developed a
Community Park area that provided the entire Villag e a pool area and rustic style centered community building. As the CDD Engineer, our services Included engineering , planning, surveying, permitting , landscape architecture, owner coordination with City of Eu sti s and Lake County, and approval of all development and construction activities.		

C.	(1) TITLE A ID LOCATION (City at1d State)
Viera CDD (Br evard County, FL)	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	I CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)	
		
Ongoing	N/A	
	[3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Bnef scope. size. cost. etc./ AND SPECIFICROLE	X I Check if project performed wllh current firm	
	Construction Inspector. Viera is a 2,000 single-family units, 900 mult i-family units, and over 20,000 square feet of commercial and retail sp ace. With over 600 acres of existi ng on-site wetlands and lakes, Dewb erry permitt ed the stormwater drainage and wetland modifications of the master stormwater system that consi sted of both lakes and wetlands that provided storage through the SJRWMD and Bre vard County. As District Engineer, our services include civil engineering ,
environmental, permitting, planning, surveying , construction adminis tration.		
- - -

.

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. a12□16)PAGE 13

(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 pro1ects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for eac/7 project.)
20 E X AMPLE PROJECT KE Y NUMBER

#1

23, PROJEC T OWNER 'S INFORMATION

Gove rnment Management Services
George Flint
407,841.5524

C ST $227,355 (Consultant Fees to Date)

SERVICES
Attenda nce to Board Meetings
Attendan ce lo Co mmuni ty Meetings Cons truction Cost Estimat es
Coor di mi l e Review/Insp ection/Analysis of Roadway Infrastruc tu re
Coo rcllmHlo n of Roadway Repair and Improvement P1ogia m for Roads within t11e CDD
Engineer's Report for Submitta l to til e Board on Sta tus
Engineering Services fo r Road way Systen t s/Analys is/Mainternince Repair Priorities Report
Reports and Recommendations on all CDD-Owned Areas/Fac ilities
Review and Inspec tion P1og1 ams for Sto1 mwate1 Management System fo1· Co1n pllance and Maintenance of Lake and Po nd System
WMD Pe1 mlt Co n1pllance  Reviews an d Reporting

Dewberry Is curren tly serving as the District En gineer and is provid ing consu lting engineeri ng, surveying, clesign and environmental/p ermitting of Improvements and modi fications and constr uction administration services for the Lake Ashton CDD. Thi s has afforded us a thorough understa nding and meeting our client's curre nt and future needs within the CDD.

As the Lake Ashton CDD District Eng in eer, we have been able to provide
prof ess io nal consulting services that address many speci fic needs of this community and specifically to the facilities owned by the District.

We've provid ed inspections and evaluations of the master stor mwater pond/lake systems , vast roadway network , and assisted the District In its compliance with SWFWMD . Also, we have ass isted in providing alte rnatives to numero us construction repairs and have contin ued to assist the board In providing engineering technical
expertise In all aspects of the CDD owned facilities. We work hand in hand with the staff and board members in providing our expert advice relating to the District in frastruct ure an d facilities.

In add ition, we've assisted the District with regard to infra structur e issues of
faci lities t hat are owned by the CDD. We have provided services associated with the infrastr ucture in the comm unity, which includes reviewing conse rvation areas (wetla nds), retentions ponds and lakes, infrastructure ro adways , sewer, wat e r and stormwate r and drainage systems, lands caping, golf course and recreational "clubhouse" facilities. We have also provided engineeri ng services to the CDD Board, including roadway analysis and maintenance repa ir prio rities, construction
cost estimates and coordination of a roadway repa ir and improvement program for all the roads within the CDD, the rev iew and inspection program for the stormwater management system for compliance and maintenance n eeds  of the lake and ponds system serving th e commun ity.
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, 1f not specified Complete one Section F for each project.)
21 TI TLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
KEY NUMBER

#2
22 YEAR COMPLETED
Dowden West COD (Orlando, FL)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES	CONSTRUCTION (If app/1cable)
Ongoing	N/A

a. PROJECT OWNER
Gov ernment Man age ment Se rvices
PROJECT OWNER 'S INFORMATION

b POINT OF CONTACT NAME
George Flint

c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.841.5524

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRA CT (Include scope. size. and cost)
Dowde n West is a 736.28-acre master planned, res idential communit y with 1,446 reside ntial units loca ted in the City of Orlando . The Development is ten (10) villages within the approved Planned Development for Starwood , which encompasses approximat ely 2,558 acres and Is entitled for 4,400 residential units.

As District Engineer, we have been responsible for providing the master utility design for the water, sewer, and reuse systems; in add ition to, master stormwater modeling for an appro ximat ely 6,500 -acre watershed that the Dowden West COD is lo cated in for both stormw ater management design and FEMA floodp lain determinatio n.

COST $5 1,085 (Co nsul tan t Fees to Date}

SERVICES
8o unda1y   Surveys
Envi ron mental /Perm i ttin g Lanclsca pe A1chilectur e
Road way Design/Improvements
Storm water Mam1gement Topographic Sur veys Tree Surveys
Utility Desig n

Oth er services Include providing landscap e architecture design  for  the  common open spaces and community parks , the design  of  commu nity  roads,  that  also include the extension of the four (4) lane Dowden Road thro ugh the commu nity, and boundary surv eys, topograph ic  surveys , tree  surveys, and other additional  surveys as needed.

FIRMS FROM SECT ION C INVO LVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a.	Dewberry Engi neers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (Clly and Srale)
Orl ando, FL

RO LE
Distri ct Engineer

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified Complete one Section F for each project.)
KEY NUMBER
I

#3

PROJECT OWNER
Lakewood Ranch COD
23, PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION

POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Anne Ross

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHON E NUMBER
941.907.0202

24, BRIEF DESCRIP TIO N OF PROJECT AND REL EVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (lncWde scope, size, andcosl)
Lakewood Ran ch is an unincorpo rated 17,500-acre community located on Florida's Gulf Coast in Manatee Co unty, Estab lished in 1995, Lakewood Ranch has an 8,500- acr e master planned community within it, consisting of seven villages with a variety of housing types and five CDOs. The development contains A-rated schools, shopping, business parks, hospital and medical center, thre e golf courses, ·as well as, an athletic center with fitness, aquatics, and lighted tennis courts. Lakewood Ranch has over 150 miles of sidewalks and trail, community parks, lak es and nature pre serv es abundant with native wildlife.

COST $90 6,730 (Co nsu lt ant Fees to Date)

SER VI CES
Civil En gineerin g
Constru ction Estim ates and Adminis tr ation
Coordin ation and Monitori ng of Enviro nm ental Jurisdictional Areas through Permitting Ag encies
Landscape Arcl1itect ure Permittin g
Planning Surveying Utiliti es Water Quality

As the COD Engi neer for all five CDD 's, Dewberr y's services include engineering, planning, surveying, pe rmitting, landscape architec ture, owner coord ination with City and County, and approval of all development and construction activities. Dewbe rry's services inc lud e civi l engineering, planning, su rveying, permi tting, utilities, water quality, landscape archite cture, construction estimat es an d ad ministration , and
coo rdination and monitoring of environmental jurisdictional areas through permitting agencies.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a	Dewberry Engineer s Inc..

FI RM LOCATION (C/ly a nd $ /ate)
Orlando , FL

RO LE
District Engine er

(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects , if not specified .
Complete one Section F for each project.)
20 EX AMP LE PROJECT KE Y NUMBER

I	#4

PROJECT OWNER
Ri zetta & Company, Inc.
PROJECT OWNER 'S INFORMATION

POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Anthony Jeancola

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.472.2471

. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size. and cost)
Cascad es at Groveland is a 751.9-acre master planned , reside ntial community located in Lake County, The Development is approved as a planned development
for 999 single-family units, an Am enity/Re creation al Center , approximately 31 acres of com mercial development and a North-South Infrastructure Road (Wilson Lak e Parkway) .

COST $350,000 (Crn1su llant Fees lo Date)

SERVICES
Civil Engin eering Constructio 17 Estimates and Administration
Coo 1 dirrntl on of Env imn 111 ental Juris dictio nal Lines and Per milti ng Due Diligence
Permitting Plan ning Survey ing

Dewberry provided services that obtained entitlem ents and approvals for the infrastructure, mass grading and the final construction of the project which is divid ed into 5 phases. We also worked with Lak e Cou n ty by designing and coordinating
the approval of the North -South Road (Wilson Lake Parkway) to serve as a main connector ro ad for th e area . We assisted the project architects in the final site design of the Club House/Community Center and Recreational Facilities.

Additional work included the necessary improvements on US 27 for the main entrance road, the extensiv e design and permitting of both the water line to service the project and the sewe r force main for connection of the sewer system to the City of Groveland facilities.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a.	Dewberry Engineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)
Orlando , FL

ROLE
District Engineer

EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
1f not specified
20 EXAMP LE PROJECT KEY NUMBER

#5

a. PROJECT OWNER
Government Management Serv ices
PR OJECT OWNER 'S INFORMATION
b POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Jason Sho we

POINT OF CONTAC T TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.841.5524 ext 104

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT /Includ e scope, si,e, and cos/)
Dewberry is curre nt ly per forming miscell an eous services for th e Montecito COD locat ed on the east sid e of South Patrick Dri ve, north o f Patrick Dri ve and west of
. -	J1Tffl	-
 
-  Jlt	l	•

COST $ 480. 210 (Consulta nt Fees to Date )

SER VI CES
Civil Engineering
Dislr icl Board Mee ting s Mon thly Meetings
P1 ocess ing Cons tructio n Pay Appl icati ons
Process in g Pay Req uisitions
....... , ..,,  ...............	... . , .. ,  ..........  ,  .  , ... .... .
U.S. Highway A1A in Satellite Beach , Florida .

Our services include engineering, surve ying and construction administration. These

of pay requisitions and construction pay appli cations, and providing general civil engineering consulting services and inp ut to th e Boa rd of Directors. These services are provided on an "as needed basis."

Dewberry also prep ar ed an Engineering Re p ort for bo nd issuance and provid ed cost estimates for said process.

FIRMS FROM SECTI ON C INVOLV ED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a,	Dewberry En gineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION(City ar,<J State)
Orlando, FL

ROLE
District Engineer

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 pro1ects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)
20 EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER

#6

a, PROJECT OWNER
Government Managem ent Se rvices
PROJEC T OWNER'S INFORMATION

POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Geo rg e Flint

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.841.5524

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO T HIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)
The Narcoossee CDD is locate d in Orlando, Orange County, Florid a, and consists of approximately 416 acres. Th e project is projected to have 540 single-family units, 860 multi-family units, and 278,0 00 square feet of retail and office sp ac e. The
Narcoossee CDD encompasses the entire 416 acres, and will construct, operate and maintain infra structure to support all of its communities.

Dewbe rry is the CDD Engineer for this project. Our services include engineering evalu ations, owner coordin ati on with City of Orlando and Orange Cou nty, and approval of all development and construction activities.

COST $2 65,000 (Consu ltant Fees lo Date)

SERVICE S
Civil Engineering
Construc tion Administration Deve lopment Pla nning
Pe rmitting Surveyi ng

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PRO JECT

) FIRM NAME
Dewberry Engineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (Cilyand Slate)
Orlando, FL

ROLE
District Engineer

Complete one Section F for each project)
20 EXA MPLE PROJECT KE Y NUMBER

#7

PROJECT OWNER 'S INFORMATION

a PROJECT OWNER
InfraMark

POINT OF CONTAC T NAME
Robert Koncar

c POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.566.4122

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RE LEVANCETO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope. size. and cost)
Live Oak Lakes COD (Twin Lakes Development) is a multi-phased, active adu lt community consisting of residential units. green open space tract s with community facilities, and a community amenity center located just off of Live Oak Lake. The development Is situated just east of Hickory Tree Road and west of Live Oal< Lake and Sardine Lak e in Osceo la County. Phases 1 - 8 consists of a mix of 50 ', 70' and duplex units totaling 2,023 units.

A 42,000 plus square foot amenity clubhouse is currently being constructed alongside the oversized pool and cabana area, which includes a ba r for food and beverages. The outdoor rec space is under construction just to the sout h. This area was designed to include bocci ball, pickle ball, horseshoes, tennis cou rts, and a ha lf basketball court. It also provides walking trails. a boat dock, and a doc k for fishing.
COST $ 2.1 million (Co nsult ant Fees to
D11t e)

SERV ICES
Ass lstm1ce wi th t11e City M <1ster Upsizing
Agreements Civil Engineering
Constru c tion Ad111lni st ration Entlll e111en l s
En viro n r11er1tal/Pen nltl ing
Landsca pe/Hardsca pe Design Maintenance o1 Traffic Plan ning Plannlr 19
Sign al Des ign
Surveying

In add ition to civil engineering services, we also provided roadway design, bridge desig n, and sig nal design within the first phase. We were re sponsibl e for the roadway widening design of Hickory Tree Road, where services also includ ed drainage and utility ext ensio ns. We extended New Nolte Road from the exist ing intersection east through tl1e first phase of const ruction. Thi s 150' right- of-way Is master planned to be a 4 lane  divided major collector road in the future . We also designed and oversaw the construction of the vehicular bridge that crosses existing Bullis Road, connecting the nort hern pool and ame nity area with the remainder of tl, e development. We provided signal design for the New Nolte and Hickory Tree Ro ad Intersection, which also includes go lf cart paths and golf cart path crossings at the updated intersection.

Utilitie s have been master designed for the build out of the development, which will include city master transmission mains for the 24" potab le water main and 24" rec laim main; along with 5 sanitary lift stations to service the phases of the
development as they are constru cted. Phase 1 of the project utilizes two sanitary lift stations, a portion of the 24" potable and rec laim mains. The first lift station is located on the west side of Hickory Tree Road . Tile second lift station is located along
the extension of Nolte Road east of Hickory Tree Roa d. This lift station has been
designed to accept additional flows from future phases of this development. This lift statio n pumps into a force main down the Nolte Road extension and connects to the existing 20" force main located within the Hickory Tree right-of-way .

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a.	Dewberry Engineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (Cily and Stare)
Orlando, FL

ROLE
District Engineer

Complete one Section F for each pro1ect)
if not specified.
#8

a. PROJECT OWNER
Gove rnment Management Services
PROJECT OWNER 'S INFORMATION

b POINT OF CONTACT NAME
George Flint

c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.841.552 4

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Incl ude scope, s ize. Bild cost)
Viera Planned Development and CDD is a 2,000 -acre mixed-use development in the City of Viera, located east of 1-95 and north of Murrell Road In Brevard County . The project consists of 2,000 single-family units, 900 multi-family units, and over 2 0,000 squar e feet of commercial and retail space . With over 600 acres of existing on -site wet lands and lakes, this project presen ted some unique design challenges; includ ing creating a viable community that balanced the developab le parcels with existing
eco logic al syste ms. Additional challenges rela ted to the need to tie into both existing and propo sed ro adw ays and proposed master utilities serving the project.

COST $750,000 (Co nsultant Fees to Dal e)

Sl;RVI ES
Civil Engl 11ee1i ng
Constru c ti on Admini stratio n Consul ting Services
Erwi ro nrnentAI Services Permi tting
Planning
P1 esentallons Su1veying

Dewberry perm itted the stormwater drainage and wetland modificatio ns of the master stormwater system that consisted of both lakes and wetlands that provided storage through the SJRWMD and Brevard County. We also monitor the wetland systems in compl iance with the SJRWMD permit as well as the design of the entire infra structure.

Dewberry con tinu es to se rve as the District Engineer for this p roject. Our services Includ ed consulting ser vices, civil engineeri ng, environme ntal services , permitting, planning, surv eying , const ruction administration and prese ntations to the Board
of Supervisors for the CDD. Dewberry also gives prese ntations to the Board of Supervisors for the CDD and is on-call to the District Manager.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INV OLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAM E
Dewberry Engineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)
Orl ando, FL

ROLE
District Engineer

#9

a _ PROJECT OWNER
InfraMark
PROJE CT OWNER 'S INFORMATION
POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Rob ert Ko ncar

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.56 6.4122

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope. size, and cost)
VillaSol COD is locat ed in Osceola County, Florida. This COD is just minutes from the Orlando International Airpo rt, area attrac tion s and theme parks , and offers amen ities like no other comm unity in the area.

Nestled along Boggy Creek, residents h ave access to a boat dock where th ey can trav el down to East Lake Toho. Resort style amenities include tennis court, bask etball cou rt, clubhouse, pool an d soft gate with guard house.

COST $175,000 (Co nsultant Fees to Date)

SER VI CES
Community Infr astr uc ture Construction Admin istration Cost Estimates
Distri ct Board Meetings Landscape Arc hitecture Plan ning
Recreati onal Facllltles Design Reports and Plan s
Roadway Design Street Lighting Design Sur veying
Water Management Systems an d Faci lities
Water and Sewer Systems

Some of Dewberry's speci fic assignme nts for this project in clud e planning, prepari ng reports and plans, designs and spec ifications for  wate r  man age ment  systems and faci lities; water and sewer system and fac iliti es, roa ds, landscap ing , recre ati onal facilit ies and street lighting. Other co mmunity infrast ructure provided by the District, as authorized in Chapter 190  F.S.; and affiliated  projects to inclL1d e engineeri ng
contra ct manageme nt and inspection services duri ng cons truction.

FIRM S FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a.	Dewberry Engineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)
Orlan do, FL

ROLE
Distri ct Engineer

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency , or 10 pro1ects, if not specified .
Complete one Section F for each project.)
20 EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER

#10

23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION

PROJECT OWNER
ln fraMark

POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Robert Konca r

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
407.566.4122

24_ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, si1.e, mid cost)

Sorrento Springs is a 680-acre Planned Develo pment within  tile  Country Greens CDD in Lake County, Florida_ Deve loped by Hewitt Properties, Inc., the project will contain 678 single-famil y lots, and an 18-hole golf course and  clubhouse facilities. The Country Greens CDD encompasses the entire 680 acres, and will construct , operate and maintain infrastructure to suppo rt the Sorrento Springs Community. In April 2002, construction of the first of four phases began.

As th e CDD Engineer, Dewberry's serv ices include engineering , planning, surveying, permitting, landscap e architecture, owner coordination with City of Eustis and Lake County, and ap p roval of all development and construction activities

COST $320 ,00 0 (Consultant Fees to Date)

SERVI CES
Civil Engineer i ng
Construction Administration Due Diligence
Landscape Arcl1itecture Permitting
Planning Surv eying

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

FIRM NAME
a_	Dewberry Engineers Inc.

FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Orlando , FL

ROLE
Dist rict Engineer

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS												

26. NAMES OF KEY
PERS ONNEL
(From Section E, Block 12)	
27. RO LE IN THIS
CONTR ACT
(From Section E, Bloc!< 13)	28. EXAMPLE PRO JECTS LISTE D IN SECTION F
(Fill in "Exampl e Projects Key" section below before completing table.
Place "X" under project l<ey number for participaffon in same or similar role.)										
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	
Rey Mal ave, PE

Nicole Stalder , PE, LEED	District Eng in eer

Assist ant District Engineer	•

•
•
•
•
•	•
•

•
•
•
•	•

•
•
•
•
•
•	•
•
•
•
•
•	•

•
•
•
•
•
•	•

•
•
•	•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•	•	•
•

•
•
•
•	•	
AP												
Joe Kee zel, PE	Sr. Ro ad way En gineer											
Marybeth Morin, PE	Sr. Structu ral Engi neer											
Sea n Carrigan, PE	Sr. Stormwa ter Eng in eer											
Bobby Johnson, PE	Sr. Utility Engineer											
Bill Donley, PSM Nicole Gough, PWS	
Survey Manag er

Sr. Environmental Scientist								•		•	
Michael Urchuk, RLA	Sr. Land scape Archi te ct											
Sarah  Maier Peter Armans, PE	GIS Technician/Planner Constru ction Inspect or								•
•		•
•	
EXAMPLE PROJE CTS KEY

NO.	TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (From Section FJ	NO.	TITL E OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (From Section F)	
1	Lake Ashton COD, Lake Wales, FL	6	Narcooseee CDD, Orlando , FL	

2	
Dowden West COD , Orland o, FL	
7	Live Oak Lake COD (Twin Lakes Development) , Osceola County, FL	

3	Lakewood Ranch CDD 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, Manatee County, FL	
8	
Viera COD , Viera, FL	
4	Cascades at Groveland COD, Groveland, FL	9	VillaSol CDD, Osceola County, FL	
5	Mont ecito COD, Satellite Beach, FL	10	Country Gree ns COD, Lake County, FL	

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. s12016) PAGE 24

PR OVIDE ANY ADDI TIO N AL INFOR MATION REQUESTED BY TH E AGENCY ATTACH ADD ITI ONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

FIRM QUALIFICATIONS

Dewberry is a leading , multi-d isciplined firm with a proven history of providing professiona l services to a wide variety of public- and private-sector clients. Established in
1956, Dewberry Is headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, with 50 locations and over 2,000 professi onals nationwide, including our local office in Orlando. Recognized for combining unsurpassed commitment to client service with deep subject matter expertis e, Dewberry is dedicated to solving clients' most complex challenges and transforming their communities.
Dewberry's Florida operation is backed by the resources and stability of a national firm and specializes In site/ civil , environmental, utility infrastructure , transportation engineering, surveying, arch itecture , and land development se rvices. Dewberry has 17 office locations and over 300 employees in Florid a, bringing expertise , qualifications, and resources to cities and counties throughout the state. Dewberry supports large and small projects in the following primary service areas:
Alt ernative de livery Architecture
Building engineering
Disaster response and emergency management Energy services
Environmental se rvices Geospatial services
Mechanical , electrical, and plumbing services Program management
Site/civil services Surveying/mapping Susta inability Transportation
Water/wastewater/reclaimed water services
We put clients first, we build strong and lasting
relat ionships to become trusted advisors to our clients. Personal commitment to our clients and standing behind our work are central principles of the "Dewberry Way."

Relevant Experience
The absolute best predictor of future success is past performance and we have a lot of experience In all areas required for this contract. Whether we are providing professional design engineering services or as a previous District Engineer, our track record speaks for itse lf.

During past years in business, no other Central Florida firm has been more involved in Florida's explosive development. This is demonstrated by the work we have pe rformed for hundreds of clients over four decades .
We have developed a unique general approach to land development projects. Our approach is tried-and -true, and it has proven, time-and -time-again, to reduce the coordinat ion efforts for our clients and, Important ly, it produces successfu l projects.
Dewberry has also developed a "Land Deve lopment Process" Manual. All our pro fessional staff members are required to know our quality procedures and to stay abreast of regulatory chan ges. The purpose of this manual is to describe the method and process in which Dewberry provides planning, design and construction related services for Land Development projects. This
process minimizes the opportunity for missed deadlines, decreases errors and omissions on the plans, plats, calculations and permits, and maximizes the opportunity to produce high quality, build-able projects, result ing in satisfied clients and a p ositive company reputation in the engineering community .
We have a defined , workab le Quality Control Plan . Every subm ittal is checked by an independent reviewer using our written quality control procedures. These procedures include Sufficiency Checklists to ensure tha t the documents are complete. The quality control checks are scheduled within the project master schedule to ensure that time is allocated to make revisions. All of our firm's staff use Quality Control Manuals to ensure
that the project is being prepared correctly tl1e first time. All of this detail means that our clients can be confident that they are getting the best possible product from Dewberry.
The following COD projects are representat ive of our relevant project experie nce :
Cascades at Groveland CDD, Lake County Country Greens COD, Lake County

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. a,2016) PAGE 25

30 PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY ATTACH ADD I TIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED

Covington Park CDD, Hillsborough County Deer Run CDD , Flagl er County
Dowden West CDD, Orlando East Park CDD, Orange County
Greater Lakes - Sawgrass Bay CDD, Lake Wales Highland Meadow s CDD, Polk County
Lake Asl1ton CDD, Lake Wales, Polk County Lakewood Ranch CDDs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, Manatee County Lakewood Ranch Stewardship , Manatee County
Live Oak Lake CDD, Osceola County Monlec lto CDD, Brevard County Narcoossee CDD, Orange County
On-Top-of-the-Wor ld CDDs, Marion County Chandler Hills East CDD, Marion County Indigo East CDD, Marion County
Bay Laurel Center CDD, Mar ion County Osceola Chain of Lakes, Osceola County
Reedy Creek Improv ement Distric t, Osceola County Reunion Resort CDD, Osceola County
Verandas CDD, Pasco County Vie ra CDD, Bre vard County VlllaSol COD, Osceola County
Project Approach
We have prepa red an organizati onal app roach to fit the specific categories of Lake Ashton CDD's organization and ope rations to suppo rt both large and small engineering projects. Through our many years of serving as District Engineer, we've been successful at becoming an ex tension of the CDD's Project Mana gement group, with the abi lity to unders tand project needs and
propo sing only on what is nece ssary to complete the task at hand. Our management team is committed to a quality product that is consistent with Lak e Ashton CDD's po licies and pro cedures .
Serving as District Engineer is Rey Malave, PE. Rey has 41 years of experience in civil engineering and a diversified background in the design and permitting of infrastructure syste ms, in cluding public facilities, utility systems, office buildings, commercial dev elopments, recreationa l facilities and indust ria l d evelopments. He has extensive exper ience with permitting agencies, including FDEP, FOOT, Florida Wat er Management Districts , and other

local age ncies. He has served as the District Engineer for over 25 CDDs and Improvement Districts in Florida.

Dewberry has prov ided roadway and bridge design services to numerous governmental agencies throughout Florida for over 30 years. Our projects have ranged
from minor intersection Improvements and milling and resurfacing of exis ting roa dw ays to capacity
imp rovements and complex, multilevel  interchanges. The extensive experience of our staff in the design, preparation of construction documents and post design services for roadways, bridg es, and associated sys tems provides Lake Ashton with the expertise to handle
any type of transportation relate d assignment. Our transp orta tion design staff, coupled with the survey, drainage, environmental, and permitting capabiliti es, allows us to efficiently complete any assi gnment, as all disciplines require d are availa ble in-house.
Traffic design may include one or more of the following items, dependent upon a sp ecific project: sig ning design, pavement marking design, signa l warrant analysis, signalizatio n design, li ghting justificati on, lighting design and traffic studies. We have extensiv e  experience  in these phase s of the project and we ar e qualified to
pe rform all aspects of tra ffi c eng ineering.

Engineering servic es related to structural design may be required for bridge wid enings, br id ge rail replace ments, box culvert extensions, retaining walls, sheet piling, overhead sign structures, multi-post g uide signs, signal pole s, mast arms light poles and fo undations for signs, signal poles and lighting. We have an experienced in­ house staff to provide these se rvices.

I
Our team can provide both utility analy ses of existing maste r systems , pre parati on and upd a tes to master plans , as well as prepare utility construction plans.
Dewberry can analyze the existing utility systems and make recommendations for upgrades or replacement. We have designed numerous utility collection and transmission facilities, gra vity sewers, force mains, reuse water and potabl e water syste ms. We have also designed numerous wastewate r and water pump statio ns. We als o have experience in the transformat ion of septic tank
systems by the installa tion of new sewer systems.

Our integrate d stormwate r managemen t seNices range from large basin studies to the design of co llect io n systems. Our team has performed analy sis on various

30, PR OVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORM ATION  REQUESTED  BY THE  AG ENCY_ ATTACH ADDIT ION AL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

projects throughout Florida. We have designed culvert replacements to extensions on numerous roadw@y
proj cts, ranging from 2-lane rural widening to multi-lane expressways.
Drainage design and permitting  are  critica l parts  of any project. We will provide assistance to the CDD in coordination with MS4 support , total maximum daily loads , Numeric Nutrie nt Criteria support, Drainage , Erosion an d sediment control, Stormwater Basin Modeling, Assessment and evaluation drainage systems, design and construction plans for stormwater management systems and coordination with state and feder al age ncies.
Assumptions and/or omissions in this area can cause significant delays in the project schedule, increase costs during co nstru ct ion and even lead to possible litig ation against the CDD. We are expe rience d in identifying, analyzing and addressing drainage impacts ass ociated with a variety of project types. Our drainage staff is knowledgeable of Water Management District criteria and we a re adept at developing creative and innovative solut ions to drainage problems. We also have experien ce prep arin g flood studies with FEMA. At the heart of our approach is a thorough document review of the existing plans, USGS Quadrangl e Maps, USDA Soll Survey, FEMA Flood Insu ra nce Maps and aerial photogra phs. With this data in ha nd, we will perform a field review during the pre-scope meeting, identi fy all drainage and permitting issues, and discuss possible drainage solutions with the CDD. Existing drainage patterns, ponding concerns and erosion problems will be documented. We will contact
the CDD's Maintenance Engineer to discuss any concerns
regarding the project area.

Dewber ry has provided continuing surveying services for several counties and mun icipa lities throu ghout the State of Florida. Our lar ge in-house survey staff, with numerous crews out of our Orlando office, are well­ versed in the rigors of on-ca ll assignments and the immedi ate response time that they require. We utilize state- of-the-art equipment to  provide  cost effective suN eying, right of way mapping,  utility  designation and Su bsurfa ce Utility Excavation (SUE) for roadway, municipal, and civil development projects. We have
extensive experience in boundary surveys , topographi c design surveys, tree surveys, inventory surveys and underground Utility mapping . Our suNey team has a dedicated sta ff of Photogrammetrists who specialize in Aerial Photogramme try, fixed and aerial LIDAR and GIS mapping .

Our services for surveying and mapping may include : As-Buil t Surve ys, Bound ary Su rveys, Eminent Domain Surveys , GIS, Legal Descript ion Preparation, Plat Preparation, Property Sk etches, Rigl1t-of-Way Mapping , SUE, Topographic SuNeys and Utility Surveys.

SUE technology combines geophysics, surveying and civll enginee ring to better locate underground
utilities. This se rv ice helps our clients avoid costly utility conflicts and construction delays caused by inac curately plotted utilities. Our 3-D Laser Scanning equipment allows our survey crews to accurat ely collect field data comprehensively and, most Importantly, safely. Dewberry is one of a select few firms In the state to have this technology .

II              JI
From determining wetland lines, to the understanding of curre nt rules and re gulations for water management
districts, our staff has full understanding and experience in providing these services for cities and other governmental agencies. We have obtained permits
with the various lo cal, State and Federal agencies for a variety of projects. We understand how to prepare
permit applications, work closely with the a gencies and obtain permits for your projects. Dewberry Will track the permit status for each agency, keep the CDD informed
of the progress of all permits and respond promptly to all requests for a dditional Informa tion.
As part of our efforts for Lake Ashton CDD, we will ass ist in determining the permits needed for each development project along with the anticipated  schedules for obtaining each permit. Additionally, we have experience in permitting with governmental ag encies such as the Water Management Distri cts, FDEP, FWC, USACE, and FDOT. We have staff that consists of both engineers and environmental scientists, many of which have worked previous ly for various permitting agencies.

d	, · 
Dewberry has extensiv e landsc ap e architecture experience througl1out Florida. Our project experienc e include s residenti al, retail office, mixed-use, streetscapes and rec rea tional uses as well cis l1ardscape and irrigation design . Our hardscape designs have included corporate plazas , streetscapes, fountains, amenity areas for mult i­ family proj ects, and urban plazas.

Our pla nning services to Lake Ashton CDD will include presentations to CDD Commissione rs and public meetings , where we would provide assistance to the CDD for the understanding of technical issues , proposed developments, projected roadway designs, possible
right -of-way changes , and to provide a professional and

30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL l IFORMATION REQ U ESTED BY THE AGENCY , ATTACH A DDI TIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED,

expert opinion on issues that may be needed by the CDD. Dewberry can assist th e COD with the following planning se rvices:
Comprehensive planning
Review of comprehensive plan amendments
Preparing land development re gulations , including form based codes, GIS and Mapp ing services
Transportation planning
Revitaliz ation/redevelopment planning

1,	
We have continually provided construction administration services to our clients on most of the projects we hav e designed. Dewberry understands the importance of establishing and ma intaining budgets. As a projec t
is constructed, it is imperative that our team monito r the project budget and keep the COD consisten tly
informe d. We have worked with many cities and counties on providing all construction se rvices, including the assistance in the preparation of bid documents, prebid meetings, pre-construc tion meet ings, construction
a dministration, site observation, pay application review and ap provals . We also provide shop drawing reviews and approvals per construction documents. We will provide ass istance to COD staff In the administration of construction contracts. Our team is currently providing these serv ices to many munici palities across the state of Florida.
Our Construction Administration staff is prepar ed to support the COD in various const ruction management related tasks. We routinely perform these services for both our public and private clie nts. Our services include:
Construction Inspection Shop Drawin g Review
Pay Applica tion Verifi cation Co nstructi on Scheduling Utility Company Coordination Final Regulatory Acceptance Record Drawing s
Project Valu e Engineer ing Bid Document Preparation
Bid Summarization and Analysis Contract Preparation
Task Initiation
Our Project Approacl1 will var y due to the type of assi gnment; howe ver, the Impo rtant firs t steps in task initiation involve Data Gat hering and Scope Deve lopment.

h	t11•
This phase consists of defining the project objectives, identifying elements involved in the tas k, conduc ting a field review meeting (if required} and developing a detailed sc ope of services.
This phase will begin onc e a specific task or project has been identified by the CDD. Once identified , we will coordina t e with the CDD to obta in all existi ng information. This data collection effort is very important in that it provides us valuable inform ation prior to developing the scope of servic es.
If app licable or desire d, an on-site field review meeting will be held jointly with the CDD and other appropriate agencies to discuss the task objectives and id entify areas of concern. Discussions regarding the projects background, scope requirements, project constraints and other relevant issues will be held to reach an understanding of the overall project goals. Based on the data collection effort and the initial on-site field meeting , the specific plan elements required for the task will be
identified and ag reed to with the CDD prior to developing
a scope of services.	II
..,  I	I I
A detailed scope of se rvices, fee estimate , and schedule for the each task will be developed based on the data gathering efforts and discussions. This scope and work effort will be heavily influenced by the quality of the
data collected and th e specific needs of each tas k.
Man-hour estimates will be provided for each discipline involved. The scope and work effort will be prepared and negotiated quick ly, so as not l o affect the schedu le.

  I    I	J' ti n
COST CONTROL
We constantly review our designs and look for ways to save our clients time and money. We exercise common sense engineering to provide practical design solutions and not merely based on the way things have alw ays been done in the past.

PROJECT CO STS
We understand the financial constraints that clients face, due to the budget cuts and ris ing construction a nd ri gl1t­ of-way costs. We will review all designs, prepared by

STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. 012016) PAGE 28

30. PROV IDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AG ENCY ATTA CH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

Dewberry or others, for cost savings measures that will not affect the intention or safety of the project. Our recent experience has shown that minor changes in the design can save materials, and reduce or avoid costly business
damage claims and/or right -of-way impacts . Another key to cost controls is to estimate costs early in the design process and as the design  evolves,  not  just  near  the end of the design process. Early  cost estimating  allows for more options to be explored to keep projects within
budget or to notify the CDD that budgets may need to be adjusted.

PR OJECT SCHEDULE
The importance of maintain ing the project schedule through the design or review proce ss cannot be overstated. Dewberry is commi tt ed to developing and adhering to the project schedule for each assignment. This is important to us, as well, because if we fail to successfully complete any assignment on time, our ability to obtain additional assignments with Lake Ashton will be limited. Furthe rmore, we will maintain an overall schedule of projects to help with internal and external coordination. We fully understand what is required to keep a project on schedu le. The following proven actions will be used by our team to control the project schedule:
Experienced Client Manager. Our District Engineer, Rey, routinely manages multi discipline projects, where coordination is critical. Dewberry's wide ra nge of in-house se rv ices ensure s close coordination between each discipline, enabling us to direct our staffing reso urc es.
Weekly Team Meetings. Coordination will be ensured through weekly team meetings. These meet ings will be used to track progress on individual tasks and as a planning tool.
Monthly Progress Reports. Montl1ly progress reports will be supplied to Lake Ashton . Tl1ese reports will be an effective snapshot of the status of each assignment and will be used to identify any potential sched ule issues.
Being Proactive. While managing the schedule , we will be proactive (vs . reactive) on all task s. Emphasis will be placed on the activity start dates to ensure timely completion.

NPDES MS4 PROG R AM SUPPORT
Having comp leted numerous programs for other cities and counties , we understand the MS4 Program and have the staff that will assist the CDD in updates, compliance questions and recommendations as needed in the ongoing program .
Communicates with District Engineer, Rey Malave

-	- - ---- - -
Assignment ,2t.Task Manager!

ONE "1 J\SI< MANAGtR iertOM 51/\Rf lU !N ISH

-- ,
30 PROVIDE ANY AD DIT IONAL INFORMATION REQUEST ED BY THE AGENCY, ATTACH ADDIT IONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED .
INDEPENDENT PEER REV IEW
An independent peer review is performed for each phase submittal. This review is performed by senior level sta ff not directly involved in the project and may be locate d in a separate office.

ONS l'RUCTABIU TY/B IDABILITY RE VIEW
Prior to the 90 and 10 0 percent submittals , the plans will be subjected to a con struc tability/bidability review. This review will be performed by our in-house const ruction
a dministrators.
I	Ii
Dewberry understands the value of repeat busine ss. Our commitment to personalized client service is such that we guarantee we will respond to each client's need s promptly and effectively. From the beginning, we reco gnized that functional efficiency and technical excellence must be provided as a matter of course in engineering design. Each project produced by our firm ref lects this corporate commitment to excellence and our insurance is our Quality Control Plan. Our Quality Assurance Plan and procedures are based on the philosophies that:

Plan. Quality is controlled by adequate planning, coordination , supervision and technical direction, proper definition of job requirements and procedures and the involvement of expe rie nced professionals.
Do. Quali ty is achieved by individuals performing work functions car efully and "doing It right the first time".
Check. Quality Is verified through checking, reviewing and su perv ision of work ac tivities, with documentat ion by objective Individuals who  were  not  directly responsib le for performing the initial work.
Act. Quality is ensured by having a manager perform quality assura nee functions that invo lve mon itoring and close review of not only the work but also the procedures used in performing the wor k.

Th e Dewb erry Team is a leader in developing comprehensive, strategic asset management programs for public Infras tructure. We typically utilize and coordinate with IT, GIS, mapping, and other appropriate technologies. Our asset management services are
part of an ap proach for help ing clients build dynamic, sustain ab le organizations that are capable of and committed to delivering the highest possib le level of value and service to thei r customers.
Our team brings a level of credibility to the process that cannot be gained from a str ict management-only
co nsulting approach, Over the coming future years, aging infrastr ucture will require an increas in g higher portion of an organization 's Capital and Renewal & Replacement (R&R) d ollars . Planning today must focus on risk based assessments, including targeted condit ion assessment to quan tify and prioritize limited R&R and capital dollars, The Dewberry Team is com prised of subject matte r experts that champion this innovative approach.

AU TH ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
The foregoing is a statement of fac ts.

132 DATE
0.25.19
33.        NAMEANomlE	'------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - - -
Rey Malave , PE, Assoc iate Vice President

ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS
PART II - GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS
(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.)
SOLICITATION NUMBER
(IFANY)

	
9. EMP LOYEES BY DISCIPLINE		

Employees

(2) BRANCH	
AN	10. PROF ILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE NUAL AVERAGE REVE NUE FOR LAST	AND
5 YEARS	

a. Function Code	o. Number
Discipline
FIRM	of		
a. Profile
Code	
b. Experience	c Revenue Index Number (see below)	
02	Administrative	210	10	B02	Bridges		
08	GADD Technician	77	5	E09	Environmental Impact Studies ,		
					Assessments or Statements		
12	Civil Engineer	367	9				
16	Construction Manager	41		H11	Housing (Residential, Multi-Family;	4	
					Apartments; Condominiums		
20	Economists/Financial Analysts	47	4	L02	Land Surveying	6	
24	Environmental Scientist	38	4	L1O	Land Development, Residential	6	
38	Land Surveyor	220	36	L11	Land Development, Commercial	5	
39	Landscape Architect	33	3	L13	Land Development, Public	2	
47
57	Planner : Urban/Regional Structural Engineer	35
138	5
6	S09	Structural Design; Special Structures
Surveying; Platting ; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies
Traffic & Transportation Engineering Topographic Surveying and Mapping
Towers (Self-Supporting & Guyed Systems)
Water Resources; Hydrology; Ground Water		
				S10		4	
60
 	62		Transportation Engineer Water Resources Engineer
Program AnalysVProgram Manager	111
119
27	21
5
2	T03		7	
				T04		5	
				T05		3	
	Water/Wastewater Engineer	89		W02			
	W03	Water Supply; Treatment and Distribution					

							

							
	Other Employees	740	2				
	Tota l	2292	114				
11 . ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRMS FOR LAST 3 YEARS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER
1. Less than $100.000	6. $2 million to less u,an $5 million
      (ln_se_1,1_  _ev_e_m_1e_in_d _ex_nu_m_b_er_s_11_0w n_a_1 _1gi_ h_l)   
_,2• $ l00 .000 to less lhan $250,000
7 55 million to less th an S10 million
a. Federal Work	1	3. $250,000 to less than ssoo,ooo
_ __b_ _N_o_n-_ _Fe_ _de r_a-_ l  W  _or k - -	-+--   -   - 8 -    -    ---< 4  ssoo,ooo to less lhan  s1 million
-     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -     +	< 5 . S1 million to less lhan S2 million
Total Work	8
$'10 million to less than S25 million 9. 525 million lo less lhan $50 million 10 S50 million or greater

12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
The  for ego ing  is a statement.of facts .

TITLE
Stone , Jr ., Director/Executive Vice President

--	7

LA K E A SH TON CO MM UNITY DE VEL OPMEN T D IS TRI CT
ENG I NEERIN G SERV I CES

FIRM LICENSES

Florido Dep11 rlm e n1 or Agricultur e imd Co11.mmer Servk cs
Di is lon nl' Consumer Se rvi'ces	License No.: LB801]
Uoard of PrllfeScSinnul S11.r ve yors and Muppu	Expi rn1ion Dme Feb ruary 28, 202 1 211115 A pnlnch, e• l'kwny Tollah nsscc, Floridu 32.,9'J-6S00

Professional Surveyor and Mapper Bu iness License
Und r 1 h ' provisi ons f Cha p1er 472. Florida Siatu te

DEWBERRY ENGJNE.ERS INC.
800 N MAGNOLIA AV STE 1000
ORLANDO, FL 32803-3251

NICOLE • IKI W FKJED
COMMISS lONEll Of' AGRI CUL TUR E

1 t)is 1   to t'tf\ri )' I.hat 1he- prof:     on.'ll su rYt )'Of    nd mapf)C.!.r "ho rmmennd-Q(kll  a,    Uf   i h ownnhow: is hr::t n K"d M  requfral hy O  p, 412, Aorid1,  Stalultt

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

Abil ity and Adequacy of Professional Personnel
We have carefully selected our team of professionals and technical experts to match our exp erie nce and expertise with the qualifications required. Our firm has a varied array of experience, disciplines, and available resources available to provide the required services to the Lake Ashton. Our team can provide engineering design, planning management , technical, and administrative services as requested by Lake Ashton and will make a
comm itment to prioritize the CDD's needs.

Our District Engineer, Rey Malave, PE, Associate Vice President at Dewb erry, has 41 years of civ il engineering experience for both public and private clients and has served as the project manager
for numerous private commercial and residential developments across Florida. This includes Dowden West CDD in Orlando; Live Oak Lake CDD (Twin Lakes Development) in Osceola County; Cascades at Grovela nd CDD in Groveland ; Lake Ashton CDD in Lake Wales; and the Lakewood Ranch CDDs in Manatee County .
Rey has a proven track record for meeting budgets and schedule s on compl ex and short time frame design projects. He is known for  his  ability  to quickly adapt to changing schedules , design
para meters, and client needs. Rey's diversified background in engin eering design includes all aspects of land development engineering including master drainage, stormwater management design, site grad ing, water and reclaim distribution and sewer collection/t ransmiss ion system s, as wel l as, project reviews for permitting a gencies.
Serving as Assistant District Engineer is Nicole Stalder, PE, LEED AP. Sh e has 17 years of civil engineering experience for both public and private clients and has served as th e project manager
for numerous private commercial and residential developments across Central Florida. This includes Live Oak Lake CDD (Twin Lakes Development) in Osceola County ; Cascades at Groveland CDD in Groveland ; Lancaster Park East in City of St. Cloud; designed over 2,000 units in the Town Center and Villages of Horizon West in Orange County ; Spruce Creek Country Club in Marion County ; Fore Ranch in Ocala; and her extensive experience designing sing le-family and mult i-fam ily developments,

Why Dewberry?
District Engineer for 25+ CDDs across Florida

Local, experienced District Engineer ready to wo1'k for you

Comprehensive understanding of CDD's infrastructure and operational needs

300+ employees in 15 offices within Florida, including a local office in Orlando

Cohesive group of professionals integrated across service areas to leverage success for our clients

60+ years helping clients build and shape communities

including Randal Park Apa rtments, Steel House Apartments, The Sevens Apa rtments , Split Oak Development , and Fell s Landing .
Our project management and organizational structure within each key service areas demonstrates our thorough understanding of the scope of this contract and our desire to meet the objectives of the project assig nments.

Our senior experienced professionals are all well versed In addressing their particular specialty a rea and have associates working under their direction to efficiently tackle any assignment from Lake Ashton. This organizational structure has a long histor y of success as a model that Dewberry has implemented across the country for similar CDDs and public agenci es.

We will continue to develop and apply innovative concepts and techniques to effe ctively and efficiently design and manage all tasks. It is

FIGURE 3.1 We buil d st rong and last ing relationships with our
clie nts. The caliber of our peo ple and combin ing unsurpassed client service with deep subject matter expertise is what sets us apart. We operate wit h the highest level of ethics and transparency .
Ou r Integrity- an d that of our people- is
second to none. Personal commitment to our clients an d standing behind our work are
two central tenants of our cultural stat ement, "Dewbe rry at Wo rk."

important to note that Dewberry is a full-service civil engineering firm that can meet your needs for any project - large or small. Dewberry can react quickly to your requests and provide all technical support under one roof.
For more information on our project management team, we have provided resumes in our Standard Form 330 included in Section 1: Standard Form 330 of our proposal.

Certified Minority Business
Dewberry Engineers Inc. is not a certified minority business.

Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
Dewberry recognizes the importance of maintaining project budgets. We have a long history of providing on-schedule services and projects that fit with in the client 's budget. Over 85% of our work is from repeat clients ... a testament to our ability to work within a budget and schedule .
The following proven actions will be used by our team to control the project budget:
Experienced Staff. The most effective means of meeting the design budget and schedule is by using experienced staff with the knowledge, training and equipment necessary to perform their assigned tasks. Dewberry's Project Team has these attri butes.
Construction Budget Controls. We are acutely aware of the volatile constru ction mater ials market and its impact on construction budgets. As such, we periodically update our cost data to ensure that the most current unit prices are being used for the construction cost estimates.
Project Schedule. One way we keep costs in line is by developing and maintaining a schedule for each task. We build a design quality control checking date into every schedule prior to the submittal date for all project delive rab les. We have found tl1at focusing on the submittal date often results in rushed or incomplete quality control checks of
the plans. Therefore, we will schedule a quality check date at least two weeks prior to the submittal date to make sure that the process

is comp leted . This also all ows our District Engineer and team to focus on the qualit y control date, resulting in plenty of time for the process to work and thus further com mitting to the project's budget.
Past Experience and Performance
For more than 45 years, our land development professionals have comb ined an unsurpassed commi tment to serving Florida developers with a deep sub ject matt er expe rtise in a broad spectru m
of professional services. We have se rv ed as District Engineer for over  25 CDDs across Florid a, varying in size from 200 acres to close to 10,000 acr es. We are experienced in CDDs from the creatio n to the cont inued ope rations .
Our clients benefit from our local experience and prese nce, and our familiarity with entitlement
issues, plan development and review processes , and lo cal codes and ordinances. We offer creative and cost-effective designs that transform com munities.
We provide our residential clients with a range of services that include land planning, entitlement

app roval, infra str ucture design and permitting, surveying, stor mwater modeling, environmental review and permi tting, sustainab le design, landscape architecture, and cost and schedule estim ating. We envision and help rea liz e possibilities to enrich comm unities, resto re built and natural environm ents, and manage positive change.
The following table demonstrates our CDD experience throughout Florida :

Geographic Location
With 15 office locations and over 300 employees in Florida , we bring expertise, qualifications, and re sources to clients throughout the State .
Located in our Orlando office , Rey and Nicole will be res ponsive, make frequent visits, and be
read ily available for meetings, presentations, or site visits . Add itionally, our project team includes local, Orlando staff members propos ed for this contract, which leads all components of our assignments  to be developed concurrently by a cohesive team .
By utilizing our extensive presence within Centr al Florida , our approach to the CDD's projects wlll combine our understanding of the various project assignments with our expe rience In identifying the CDD 's needs to develop the appropriat e project team for each assignment. This allows us to minimize the time needed from project request to "boots on the ground" activity.
In addition, our Project Team is supported by nationally -recognized subject matter experts and dedicated quality control staff who have the
required capacity to provide the array  of required serv ices to Lake Ashton . This depth of organizat ion permits us to call upon special ists  and  a broad base of support to satisfy diverse or man power intensive tasks.
Current and Projected Workloads
Dewberry has an exce llent track record of meeting time and budget re quirements on the projects we have highlighted in this response and will meet this goal with Lake Ashton . We are fully available for this contract!

Our team , supported by  a  stro ng in-house team of infrastructure design specialists , p la nners, surveyors, environmental sci entists, ri ght-of-way mappers, roadway engineers , maintenance of traffic engineers and construction inspec tion personnel, has th e capacity to address all of the CDD's needs throughout the term of this contract.

Due to the capacity and avai la bility of our prop osed staff, we can commit to the  CDD  our  dedicated team memb ers for these important projects.

Volume of Work Previously Awarded to Consultant by District
As demonstrated throughout our proposal, Dewberry has extensive experience working with Lake Ash ton CDD, which allows our team to continue to provide Lake Ashton with the unique experience, familiarity, and understanding of the type of services that will be requ ested.

"' --  - ..--- ,.....,,,......_ -- -- --- ------------.-1. . -	--	----
1	-	4...	.	•	J     .      '	.	1
STATEMENT	OF QUALIFICATIONS
RFQ FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE LAKE ASHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

D ISTRIC T ENGINEER REQUEST FOR Q UA LIFIC ATIO NS
Sub m it t e d on October 24, 20 19

La ke Ash to n C o m m un ity De ve lo p m ent District 5385 N. Nob Hill Road,
Sun rise, Flo rid a 33351

Submitted by:

735 East Main Stree t Bartow, FL 33830
863-537- 7901

a d m in @ra yle ng.c om

www  .ray\eng	in  e  e  ring.c o m

October 23, 2019

Lake Ashton Community Development District 538S N. Nob Hill Road
Sunrise, Florida 333S1

RE: DISTRICT ENGINEER REQUEST FOR QUALIFICAT IONS

Ms. Jill Burns,

Rayl Engineering & Survey ing, LLC is pleased to present to the Selection Committee this response to the above referenced Request for Qualifications. We are confident that no other team can bring the project understanding, expertise, and experience to this RFQ that we do.

We are experienced with providing these types of services to Community Development Districts. We already have an on-site familiarity with the Client's location and we know the regulatory processes and challenges affecting the Lake Ashton Community Development District. Since 2016, Alan Rayl and Rayl Engineering clnd Surveying, LLC has been the District Engineer for the Lake Ashton II CDD, additionally Alan Rayl served as District Engineer for the Highland Estates CDD from Its inception until 2009.

Rayl Engineeri ng & Surveying, LLC appreciates the opportunity to submit a response to this RFQ for Professional Engineering Services for the Lake Ashton Community Development District and looks forward to your favorable evaluat ion.

Thank you. Sincerely,

Alan L. R	I,	, PSM
Owner/	esident
Rayl Engineering & Surveying, LLC

I	(

735EastMainStreet  •  Bartow,FL:33830 •  863-537-7901 • alan@raylen0.com	Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 3

SECTION 4
Federal, State, and Local Licenses
Business Authorization within the State of Florida Qualification Statement - US General Service Administrations
11  Architect-	Engi  neer  Qualifications, Standard  Form  N o. 3301 1
Additional Requested Information
CATEGORY 1: Ability and Adequacy of Professional Personnel
CATEGORY 2: Consultant ' s Past Performance
CATEGORY 3: Geographic Location
CATEGORY4: Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
CATEGORY 5: Certified Minority Business Enterprise
CATEGORY 6: Recent , Cu rrent, and Projected Workloads
CATEGORY 7: Volume of Work Previously Awarded to Consultant by COD

7 3 5 E aat Main St re et • Bart ow, FL 338:30 • 86:3- 5 :37 - 7 9 0 1 • alan@rayleng.com	Page 2

SECTION 1	Federal, State, and Local Licenses

rcm 1r--1s

City of Bartow, Florida
BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT
m	E   MArn  ST	J
L  OCATION OF BUSINESS	­

This Business Tax Receipt Is to be displayed conspicuously at t11e location of business, and is not lranslerable or assignable.

ALAN RAYL
RAYL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
735 E. MAIN STREET
BARTOW	FL 33830

EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/2020		
DATE ISSUED

8 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 9	TAX RECEIPT#

02056	
BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT FOR

ENGINEERS		

A Business Tax Receip l Is llereby issued by the city of Bartow, Florida to tile following party to engage In or manage the business. profession or occupation shown, pursuant to the ind icated subsec tion of Bartow code sec tion 70-36 for til e Tax Receip t year.

<5-
J	.
I

I
::;i

735  East Main Street •  Bartow, FL 33830 •  863-537-7901 • alan@rayleng.com	Pa ge 3
:YL

SECTION 2	Business Authorization within the State of Florida

Florida Department of' Agriculture and Consumer Serv ices Division of Consumer Services
Hoard ol' Professional Sur vey ors and Mappers 2005 Apalachee Pkway Ta ll uhassee, Florida 32399-6500

License No .: LB7770
Ex pirat i on Dale February 28, 2021

Professional Surveyor and Mapper Business License
Under the provisions of Chapte r 4 72, Flori da  S1a1ue1s

RAYL ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING LLC
415 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202
BARTOW, FL 33830

ADAM 1-1. PUTNAM
COMMI SSI ONER OF AGR I CULTURE

T h is  is  to cc r li  fy    thatt he  p r o  fossi onnl

J'	I · cn ui r" d b)• Cha p1cr 472 Florida S1 n1111cs. sur veyM and mupper w hose 1mmc am] address .:ire sohwn u    ovt!s1   1ccn sec ,  1s  r . ,	1,;	•

Flnl'ida Department of Ag ricultur e and Consum er Serv ices
Division of Consumer  Ser vi ces	LicenseN  o.: LS5736
Board of  Profess ional S urveyors  and  Mappers 2005 Apalachee Pkway Ta llaha ssee, Florida 32399-6500
Ex pi rat i on Dale     February 28, 202 1

Professional Surveyor and Mapper License
Under lhc prov isions or Chap ter 472, Florida Statut es

ALAN LEE RAYL
415 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 BARTOW , FL 33830

NI COLE "NIKKI" FRIED
COM tvll SSI ONER OF AGRI CULTURE

'l'hi!i is 10 tc 1·1i fy 1!1111 1hc 1m  1fcs,;irn111l . 11r vcynr n111I n m ppcr wlm, s · 11a111c 11ml 1u hlri:-s,s nrc  l1own nhn vc- i s lir cn i.":rl  as requir ed by Clrnp1cr   72. Fluri t.ln S t111111c s,

7:35 East Main Street • Bartow, FL 33830 • 86:3-537-7901 • alan@rayleng.com
Page 4

SECTION 2	Bus iness Authorization within the State of Florida

	RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR	J ONATHAN ZACH EM.   SE  CR ETAdRY	b	l	r	

STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS HEREIN IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471 , FLORIDA STATUTES

RAYL ENGI NEERI NG AND SURVEYING, LLC
415 EA ST MAIN STREET SUITE 202
BARTOW	FL33830

LICENSE N UMBER: CA28820
EXPI RATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2021
Always verify licenses onllne at MyF lo rlda license .com

Do not alter this document In an y form.

This ls your licen se. It Is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.		

735EastMain5treet •  6artow,FL33830 •  863-537-7901 • alan@rayleng.com	Page 5

SWORN STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 287.133 (3) (a),
FLORIDA STATUTES, ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES

THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED IN Tl T E PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICI AL AUTHORJZED TO ADMINISTER OATl-IS.

I . This sworn statement is s ubmi tted for Lake Ashton Community De ve lo pme nt District

This sworn statement is s ubm i tted by Rayl Engineering & Surveying, LLC Whose business address is: 735 East Main Street , Bartow, FL, 33830
and (if applicable) its Federa l Employer Identification Num ber (FEIN) is 27-0914050
(lf enti ty has no FEIN, include th e ocial Secutity Num ber of the individual signi ng this sworn s ta temen   t: 	

My name is Alan L. Rayl, PE, PSM
a bo ve is Owner/ President
and my relat ionship to the ent it y named

I u11dersta11d that a "public entity cri me" as defined in Section 287 .133 (1 )(g), Florida Sta tutes, means a violation of a ny  state or federal  law by a person with respect  to and directl y related to the transaction of busin ess with any public entity or with an agency or po liti cal subdivisi on of any other sta te or of the United State s, includ i ng, but not li mit ed to, any bid or contract for goods or services to be provided to any public enti ty or an agency or political subdiv ision of any other state or of the United States nnd involving antitrust, fraud , theft, btibcry, co llusion, racketee1i ng, conspirncy, or materia l misr epresentat ion.

l understand that "co nvicted" or ''co nviction" as defined in Section 287. 1 33 ( I ) (b), Florida Statutes, means a finding of gui lt or a conviction of a public entity crime with or without  adj udication of guilt, in any federal or state trial court of record, relati11g to charges brought by indictment or infonnation  after July  I , 1 989, as a result of a jrny verd ict,  non-ju1y t rial, or entry of a plea of guilty or nolo conte nder c.

J understand that an "a ffili ate'' as defined in Section 287. 1 33(1) (a) Floridu Statut es, means: ( I ) A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public enti ty c1ime; or (2) An ent ity und er th e con trol of any natural person who is active in the managem ent of the enti ty and who has been convicted of a pub lic enti ty crime. The term "affiliate" includ es those officers, di rector s, exe cutives, pa11 ne rs shareho lders, emp loyees, memb ers, and agents who are active in the management of an affi li ate. The ownership by one person of shares constituting a controlling interest in another person, or a pooling of equipment or incom e among persons when not for fair market value under an a rm 's length agree ment, sha ll be a p1irna facic case that one person co nt rn ls anoth c1· person.  A  perso n  w ho  knowingly  enters  into a joint  v..:nlurc  with  u  p..:rt;On  who has been convicted of a public ent i t y cr ime in Florida du1i ng the preceding 36 months shall be consid ered an affilfate.

	I understand that a "person" as defined in Section 287.133(1) (e), Flo1ida Statutes, means any natural person or entity organized under the Jaws of any sta te or of the Unit ed States with the legal power to enter into a binding conh·act and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the

provision of goods or services let by a public entity, or which otherwise transacts or applies to transact business with a public entity. The tenn "person" includes those officers, directors, execut ives, partners , shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in management ofan entity.

Based on information and belief, that statement which l have marked below is h'Ue in relation to the entity submitting this sworn statement. lPlease indicate which statement app lies.]

Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor one or more of  the  officers directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members , or agents  who  are active in the management of the entity, nor any affiliate of the entit y, has been  charged with and convicted of public entity crime subsequent to July I , 1989.
There has been a proceeding concerning the conviction before a hearing officer of the State of Florida, Division of Administrntive Hearings. The final order entered by tl1e hearing officer did not place the person or affiliate on the convicted vendor list. [Please attach a  copy of the Final Order.]

The person or affiliate was placed on the convicted vendor list. There has been a subsequent proceeding before a hearing officer of the State of Florida, Division of Administrative Hearings. 111e ftnal order entered by the heating officer dete1mined that it was in the public interest to remove the person or affiliate from the convicted vendor list. [Please attach a copy of the Final Order.]

The person or affiliate has not been placed on the conv·cted any action taken by or pending with the Depat1ment of

Date:	October 21, 2019

STATE OF:
-Fl-orid-a - - - - - - - - -
COUNTY  OF:-Polk ----------
PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
who afte1· first being sworn by me, affixed his/her si ature in the space provided above on this
_ill_ day of   ()::Ju'Qe,,C	, in he year oZO

c_fi';·sonally known to r§)or Produced Identification:

Type oflD
:YL

SECTION 3	Qualification Statement -  US General Service Administrations " Architect -Engineer Qualifications, Standard Form No. 330"

See fo ll o wi ng pages  .

ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS

PART I -CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS

CONTRACT INFORMATION
TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Request for Qualifications "RFQ" for Engineerin Services for The Lake Ashton Community Development District

PUBLIC NOTICE DATE	3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER
 09/20/2019	
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT

NAME AND TITLE
Alan L. Rayl, Owner/ President
NAME OF FIRM
Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC
TELEPHONE NUMBER	7. FAX NUMBER
 863-537-7901	N/A	

8, E-MAIL ADDRESS
alan ra len .com
PROPOSED TEAM
(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)
	(Check)	
9. FIRM NAME	
10. ADDRESS	
11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT			
	lJJ
::a
cai.:	I<{
ll.	Z' oc::
ii				

a.				Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC

□CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE	735 East Main Street, Bartow, FL 33830	Civil Engineering Consultant	

b.				
□CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE			

c.				
□CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE			

d.				
□CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE			

e.				
n CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE			

f.				
□CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE			
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART  OF PROPOSED TEAM	0	(Attached)
AUTHORIZED  FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION	STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. 8/2016)

(	I

RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Complete  one Section  E for each key person.)
12. NAME

Alan L. Rayl	13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

Principle in Charge/ Project Manager	14. YEARS EXPERIENCE
a. TOTAL	lb. WITH CURRENT FIRM
34	10 years	
FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and Stllra)
Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC, Bartow, Florida
EDUCATION (Degree and Spec/a/lzation)
Bachelor of Science, Clvll Engineering - Purdue University 1987

CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and D/scipl/ne)
Florlda Registered Professional Engineer #44116 Georgia Registered Professlonal Engineer #28580 lndlana Registered Professional Engineer #920107
Florlda Registered Professlonal Surveyor and Mapper #5736

OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Pub //calions, Organizations, Training, Awards, ere.)
Florlda Engineering Society; Florlda Surveying and Mapping Society; Florida Stormwater Association; Florlda Redevelopment Association; Polk County Builders Association; Mulberry, Winter Haven, Fort Meade & Bartow Chamber; More on resume.

RELEVANT PROJECTS

a.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Stare)
Lake Ashton II Pavement and Curbline Assessment and Inventory
Lake Ashton II CDD, Winter Haven, Florida	(2) YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICESI CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)	
		
2019	2019	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, arc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	[Z] Check if project performed with current firm
Surveyed all of the pavement and curbline within Lake Ashton II COD. The assessment noted any broken, sunken, and/or areas with impaired function and a list of recommended repairs was made. A pavement condition assessment was completed to rate the condition of the surface of the road network. Roads were scored and assigned a recommend
action.		

b.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Lake Ashton II Pick/eba/1
Lake Ashton II CDD, Winter Haven, Florida	PROFESSIONAL SERVICEI
(2) YEAR COMPLETED
S CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)	
		
2018	2019	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, ere.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	[{I Check if project performed with current firm
Design, permitting, and development of two new Plck/eba/1 courts and ancillary parking Jot at their existing Health and Fitness Center.		

c.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Lake Ashton II SWFWMD
US 27 & Thompson Nursery Road, Lake Wales, Florida	(2) YEAR COMPLETED	
		PROFESSIONAL SERVICESICONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2017	2019	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc,) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	[Z] Check If project performed wtth current firm
Designed and permitting of the master infrastructure (road, drives, sewer, water, stormwater, and flood plan) for the Aldi anchored shopping center. Permit coordination with Polk County, SWFWMD, and FOOT.		
	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Stale)
Traditions Subdivision
Winter Haven, Florida	(2) YEAR COMPLETED	
		PROFESSIONAL SERVICESicONSTRUCTION (/fappl/cable)
2017	2017	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, ate.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	[2J Check if project performed with current firm		
Served both the developer (Lennar) and the HOA with miscellaneous services including flooding remediation and
	shoreline enhancement.		

e.	(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Stale)
Lime Avenue Drainage Issue s
Lime Avenue, Dundee, Florida	(2) YEAR COMPLETED	
		PROFESSIONAL SERVICESICONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2019	2019	
	(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE	0 Check if project performed with current firm
Surveyed the existing conditions in the affected areas including roadway edge of pavement, driveways,  driveway culvertsi swales, storm structures and other related features . Created a construction plan and design for  remedlatlng the conditions causing the flooding. Provided construction phase services.		
STANDARD FORM 330 (REV . 8/2016) PAGE 2

PROJECT OWNER
Lake Ashton II CDD

PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION
POINT OF CONTACT NAME
G. DouQlas Robertson, Chair

c, POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
954-629-8757

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)
Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC reviews all of the pavement and curbline conditions within Lake Ashton II CDD. The assessment noted any broken, sunken, and/or areas  with  impaired  funct ion .  Once  assessed,  Rayl  Engineering  and Surveying, LLC compiled a recommended repair list. A Pavement Condition Index assessment was completed to score the condition of the road network.  Each  roadway  was  given  a  score  based  off  of  condition  factors.  Once  scored,  the  roads were assigned a recommended action. This assessment resulted in a 200+ page report for the Lake Ashton II CDD.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3) ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
2	
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and Slate)
Lake Ashton II Pickleball Courts and Parking Lot, Winter Haven, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2017-2018	2018	

PRO ECT OWNER
Lake Ashton II CDD
POINT OF CONTACT NAME
G. Douqlas Robertson, Chair
c, POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
CJ     954-629-8757	CJ

24, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Serving as District Engineer for the Lake Ashton II  Community  Development  District we have worked on numerous projects including the design, permitting, and development of two new Plckleball courts and ancillary parking lot at their existing Health and Fitness Ce nter .

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3) ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3) ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)	(3) ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and St<1te)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3)ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3) ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
3			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Lake Ashton II Pond Repair, Winter Haven, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED			
	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable}
2015-2017	Ongoing			

PROJECT OWNER
Lake Ashton II COD
POINT OF CONTACT NAME
G. Douqlas Robertson, Chair
POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
G   954-629-8757	G

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Recommend and supervise maintenance and repairs to over 30 stormwater ponds as part of the Lake Ashton II CDD Master Surface Water Management System. Once repairs were completed, the project received a permit compliant certification from SWFWMD. Repairs included slope restoration and stabilization, vegetation removal, and repairs/ construction of multiple sidedraih filtration systems including filter fabric, filter media, perforated pipe repair and replacement, cleanout reconstruction and new installations of ballast to complete the syst em( s).

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (Oityand Stale)
Bartow, Florida	(3) ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a, Rayl Engineering and Surveying , LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3) ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3) ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)	(3) ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified .
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
4			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (CityandSlata)
Lake Ashton II SWFWMD Certifications, Winter Haven, Florida	22. YEAR COM PLETED			
	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If appl/cabla)
2019	Ongoing			

Lake Ashton II COD
G. Douqlas Robertson, Chair
D 954-629-8757

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scopa, slza, find cost)

Ongoing monitoring of Surface Water Management System as part of continued required SWFWMD certifications.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3) ROLE
Prime Consultan t	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Sta/a)	(3)ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Sta/a)	(3)ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stata)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
5			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Lal<e Marie Water Line, Dundee, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED			
	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2018	Pending			

Town of Dundee
Deena Ware, Town Manaaer
Rn:1-4:IR-R:l::lO
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Coordinated with Town staff to discuss and permit the construction of 1,228 linear feet of 1O" water line to replace an existing transite asbestos water line currently serving the Lake Marie Park, the Town Community Center, and adjacent residential neighborhoods .

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	{1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3)ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	{3)ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
6			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Lime Avenue Drainage Investigation, Dundee, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED			
	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2018- Present	2019 - Ongoing			

PROJECT OWNER
Town of Dundee
POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Deena Ware, Town Manaqer
c, POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
863-438-8330

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Surveyed the existing conditions in the affected areas including roadway, driveways, driveway culverts, swales, storm structures and other related features. Created a construction plan and design for remediating the conditions causing the flooding. This included driveway culvert maintenance, establishment of roadside swales with positive outfall, installation of new driveway culverts in areas where they do not currently exist, and other related improvements. Construction Phase services included staking, inspection, observation, as-built and record drawing preparation, and certifications of
co nstructi on.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3)ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Sia/a)	(3)ROLE	

f.	(1)FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects , If not spec ified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
7			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Winnie Lane Town Homes, Lakeland , Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED			
	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If appl/cable)
2019	Pending			

a. PROJECT OWNER
GG5900. LLC
b, POINT OF CONTACT NAME
Gil G;:irrinnAr
c, POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
863-712-6047
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC was the consultant for the Winnie Lane Town Homes. There will be 3 duplexes constructed on this site. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC requested and attended a pre­ application meeting at the Bartow office of SWFWMD to determine drainage criteria for the contemplated project. We also conducted sufficient background research (flood zone, existing soils, etc.) to present at the meeting. Services provided to the client included, Civil Engineering Design and Permitting, Land Surveying services, coordination with Polk County Land Development on a Level II Submittal.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3)ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stata)	(3)ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stata)	(3) ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Sta/a)	(3) ROLE	

e.	(1)FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stats)	(3) ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stats)	(3) ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECT i<EY NUMBER
8			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Dundee Paving RFP, Dundee, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCT ION (tf applicuble)
2019	2019			

Town of Dundee
Deena Ware, Town Manaqer
863-438-8330
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)
Assisted the Town with the writing of the RFP for milling and resurfacing approximately 3/4 miles of local and collector roadways inside the Town limits. Reviews and evaluated contractors bids and made recommendations for bid a war d. Worked with contractor during construction for scheduling coordination, reviewed pay requests, and provided post construction review of completed project.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVO LVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3) ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stats)	(3) ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stats)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stats/	(3)ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)	(3) ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECTl<EY NUMBER
9			
21. TfTLE AND LOCATION (City ancf State)
Telecom, Temple Terrace, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfappllcable}
2017 to Present	2018 to 2019			

JT Enterprises II
Joe Taqqart
813-230-6555

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC provided master infrastructure plan, permitting, and construction services to the 6 out pi;lrcel commercial development in Temple Terrace, Florida. Coordination with US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Transportation, Hillsborough County, Department of Environmental Protection, City of Temple Terrace, and SWFWMD.

Rayl Engineering & Surveying also provided the following services:
Coordinate with the Client's Geotec hnica l consu ltant for the Master Plan/Mass Grading design.
Review extent of muck removal/ unsuit able soils to be addressed during Master Plan/ Mass Grading design.
Coordinate with the Client's Traffic consultant for the Fletcher Avenue and internal cross access connections.
Prepare Erosion Cont rol and SWPP Plan as part of Construction plan set.
Prepare Drainage Calculations demonstrating compliance with previously established impervious surface thresholds in the existing master drainage system.
Prepare Master Site Plan/Preliminary Plat.
Prepare Master Grading and Master Drainage Plan.
Prepare cut/fill calculations, including any muck removal per recommendations of the Geotec hnica l consultant.
Prepare Master Utility Plans for extension of onsite sanitary sewer and potable water systems.
Submit for Construction Plan approval from the City of Temple Terrace
Submit for ERP approval (permit modification) from the Southwest Florida Water Management District.
Submit for a driveway connection permit from Hillsborough County for the Fletcher Avenue connection.
Submit for an FDEP potable water system permit through the Hillsborough County Health Department.
Submit for an FDEP wastewater system permit through the Hillsborough County EPC. 15 .		Provide responses to review comments in support of permit issuance.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)
Bartow, Florida	(3)ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3) ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3) ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Slate)	(3)ROLE	
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.
Complete one Section F for each project.)	20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER
1 O			
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
Traditions, Dundee, Florida	22. YEAR COMPLETED
PROFESSIONALSERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
2017 to 2018	2017 to 2018			

PROJECT OWNER
Lennar and Traditions HOA
POINT OF CONTACT NAME
o Keith Malcuit
POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER
o 813-414-3749

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Inc/Ude scope, size, and cost)

Provided Due Diligence survey, assessment, and evaluation of infrastructure prior to the HOA taking ownership of those assets. Additionally, in cooperation with Traditions Environmental Consultant, provided engineering plans and permitting for the 1.28 acre Lake Ruby shoreline enhancement project.

FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)
Bartow, Florida	(3)ROLE
Prime Consultant	
a. Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC				

b.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (C ity and State)	(3)ROLE	

c.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

d.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and Stale)	(3)ROLE	

e.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

f.	(1) FIRM NAME	(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)	(3)ROLE	

KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS

26. NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL
(From Section E, Block 12)	27. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT
(From Section E, Block 13)	28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F
(Fill in "Example Projects Key" section below before completing table.
Place "X" under project key number for participation in same or similar role.)										
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	

Alan L. Rayl, PE, PSM	Principle In Charge I Project Manager	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	

												

												

												

												

												

												
												
EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY

NUMBER	TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (From Section Fl	NUMBEF	TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT IFrom Section Fl	
1	LA II Pavement & Curbline Assessment	6	Lime Avenue Drainage	
2	LA II Pickleball Courts and Parking Lot	7	Winnie Lane Town Homes	
3	LA II Pond Repair	8	Dundee Paving	
4	LA II SWFWMD Certifications	9	Telecom	
5	Lake Marie Water Line	10	Traditions Due Diligence	

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

See RFQ Response .

PART II • GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS
(If a firm has branch offices , complete for each specific branch office seekim:, worlc)
2a, FIRM ( or Branch Office ) N AME
Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC	3,  YEAR ESTABLISHED1
2009	4, UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER
27-0914050					
2b. STREET
735 East Main Street	5. OWNERSHIP						
	a. TYPE
S Corporation						
2c. CITY
Bartow		1 2d. STATE 1 20. ZIP CODE
FL	33830					
			b, SMALL BUSINESSSTATUS
N/A				
6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE
Alan L. Rayl, Owner/ President							
	7. NAME OF FIRM (If Block 2a Is a Branch Office)						
6b, TELEPHONE NUMBER
863-537-7901		1 6c. E -MAIL ADDRESS
alan@rayleng .com					
Sa. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any)	Sb . YE AR ESTABLISHE	D Sc . UNIQUE ENTITY IDENT IFIER					
							
9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE	10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE
AND ANNUA L AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS						
a, Func tion Code	
b, Disciplin e	k::. Numb er of Employees	a. Profile Code	
b. Experience	o. Revenu e Index Number
/on o h n ln ,., I		
		(1) FIRM	(2) BRANCH				
12/38	Civil EnQineer / Surveyor	1		cos	Multiple Examples	1	
08	GADD Techn ician	1		C06	Multiple Examples	1	
02	Administrative	1		COB	Multiple Examples	1	
12	Civil EnQineer	1		C16	Multiple Examples	1	
				H06	Multiple Examples	1	
				HO?	Multiple Examples	1	
				H09	Multiple Examples	1	
				H10	Multiple Examples	1	
				H11	Multiple Examples	1	
				106	Multiple Examples	1	
				L02	Multiple Examples	1	
				001	Multiple Examples	1	
				P05	Multiple Examples	1	
				P06	Multiple Examples	1	
				S04	Multiple Examples	1	
				S10	Multiple Examples	1	
				S13	Multiple Examples	1	
				T04	Multiple Examples	1	
				W03	Multiple Examples	1	
				W04	Multiple Examples	1	
	Other Employees						
Total	4						
11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM
FOR LAST 3 YEARS
(lnserl revenue inde x number shown at right)	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER
Less than $100 ,0 00	6.	$2 million to less than $5 million
$100,000 to less than $250 ,000	7.	$5 million to less than $10 million
$250,000 lo less than $500,000	8,	$10 million to less than $25 million
$500,000 to less than $1 million	9.	$25 million to less than $50 million
5,	$1 million to less than $2 million	10. $50 million or greater						
a. Federal Work	1						
b. Non-Federal Work							
c. Total Wor)( "\.	2						
	2						
12.  AUTHORIZ  ED REPRESENTATIVE
The foregoing is a statement of facts.

a,        S I GNAT U	v	/	rDATE
10/23/2019

a,                                                                 NA ME  ANDT I T L E	l	I
Alan L. Rayl, Owne IP esident
STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. 8/2016) PAGE 6

SECTION 4

Category l:
Additional Requested Information

Ability and Adequacy of Professional Personnel (Weight 25 Points)

Rayl Engineering & Surveying, LLC is an S Corp business and has been since being founded in August of 2009 . Alan L. Ra yl, PE, PSM is the Owner and solely in charge of all management decisions. Alan L. Rayl opened the firm after being with other firms in the Tampa Bay and Central Fl orida markets since  1987 . During the economic downturn, Alan also held the position of Polk County Engineer  in  the  Land Development Division of the Office of  Planning and Development.  Alan L.  Rayl is Involved  in all aspects of all Engineering & Surveying projects as well as Client and customer service . Alan L. Rayl will be personally handling all District meetings, construction se rvi ces, and other engirieering tasks.

We provide private sector land development engineering design and permitting across Central Florida, as well as public sector consulting to many of Polk County municipalities. Our clientele includes local developers and businesses, Community Development Di st ricts and Property Owner's Associations/Home Owner's Associations, National Home Builde rs, the cities of Mulberry and Fort Meade, and the Town of Dundee. Our services include general civil engineering and land surveying service s. When needed, specialty sub -consultant s are utilized on a per-project basis.

CATEGORY 1: ABILITY AND ADEQUACY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL CONTINUED
Alan L. Rayl, PE, PSM
President/Owner
Alan Rayl has been a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Florida since 1991 and has also been a Registered Professional Su1veyor and Mapper in Florida since 1997. Alan founded Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC on August 24, 2009.

Professional Registrations
Florida Registered Professio11al Engineer #44116 Georgia Registered Professional Engineer #28580 Indiana Registered Professional Eng ineer #920107
Florida Registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper #5736 FDEP Certified Stormwater Inspector #5386

Education
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering - Purdue University 1987

Special Qualifications
More than 30 years of experience, encompassing commercial, residential, municipal, and transportation facilities in the Midwest, South and Central Florida,. and the Cari bbean.
Experience managing and perlorming all types of public and private land development projects, from initial appraisals and master planning through preparation and design of construction documents, construction observation, and certificat ions.
Direct experience with regulatory programs of local municipalities and Counties and the State of Florida Water Management District, as well as the Florida Department of Environmental Protection , FEMA, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers affecting stormwater, water and sewer utilities, and wetlands.

Professional Organizations and Memberships
Greater Mulberry Chamber of Commerce, Board Member, 2008-2016; President , 2012 Dundee Area Chamber of Commerce, Board Member 2019
Fo1t Meade Chamber of Commerce, Member
Bartow Chamber of Commerce, Board Member, 2016-present
Florida Engineering Society, Ridge Chapter, State Director (2010), Engineer of the Year (2010),
President, (2009 -2010 & 2015 -2016), Vice President (2008 -2009)
Commissioner, City of Bartow CRA, 2009 -2017 ; Chairman, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2016 -2017 Florida Surveying and Mapping Society, Ridge Chapter
Florida Stormwater Association, Conference Committee Member (2016-present) Florida Redevelopment Association, Committee Member (2019)
Past Member, International Councll of Shopping Centers
Member, Polk County Builders Association, Board Member, (2019), Governmental Affairs Committee Chair (2019),
Member (2009-present), Co-Chair (2010-2011)
Member, Polk County Utility Code Update Stakeholders Committee (2010-2011) Member, City of Lakeland Subdivision Code Update Committee, 2011
Member, City of Bartow Gateways Project Committee, 2011 Graduate, Leadership Bartow, Class XIII, 2008-2010 Graduate, Leadership Polk, Class IV, 2010-2011
Leadership Polk Alumni Association, Steering Committee, 2011-present ; Membership Committee Chair, 2016 -
present
Bone Valley SAS Focus Group
ACE Mentor Volunteer (2018 - present) Polk County School Board Volunteer
:YL

Category 1:	Ability andAdequacy of Professional Personnel Continued

ENG INEERING & S URVEY ING. LLC

Viviana Rosado
CAD Technician

Viviana Ros ado has been employed as a CAD Techn ician with Ray l Engineering and Survey ing, LLC since Ju ne of 2019.

Education
ln stitut o de Banca - Man atl, Puerto Rico, US

Special Quallficatlons
Over 10 years' experience preparing construction plans, both residential and commercial, in Auto CAD.
Experienced In construction inspection and estimate preparat ion.

ProjectExperience
Telecom - Preparat ion of Master Site Plan, Preli minary Plat, Master Grading, Master Drainage Plan, and more for the 6 out parcel commercial development In Temple Terrace.

Winnie Lane - Preparation of Master Site Plan, Preliminary Plat, and more for the future three duplex sit e in Lakeland, Florida.

Schools for the 21st Century, Puerto Rico - Inspected a remod eling projec t for a program of the Government of Puerto Rico called ' Schoo ls for the 21st Century'. This was Puerto Rico's largest public school modernization program in decades. The Government of Puerto Rico working jointly with PRPPPA developed a Design-Build-Maintain (DBM) program to modernize 100 public schools throug hout Puert o Rico.

Coliseo de Arecibo Manuel G. Iguina Reyes, Puerto Rico - Worked on the final plans for the Manuel Iguina Coliseum located in Areclbo, Puert o Rico. The Manuel IguinaColiseum is an indoor sporting arena with a capacity of 12,500 people.

John Cheng, El
Project Engineer

John Cheng has been employed as a Project Engineer with Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC since October of 2019 .

Education
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering - Purdue Universit y 2019

Special Qualifications
Experienced In groundwater flow, drainage, and sanitary systems.
Experienced in designing and creating dra wings in AutoCAD.
Experienced In designing parking garages, stadiums, apartment complexes, roadway roundabouts, and more.

Professional Organizations and Memberships
Member of t he American Concrete  Institute ,Sep  2018  - Present Member of the American Society of Civil Engineering, Jan 2017 - Present
Member of the Society of Asian Scientists an d Engineers, Jan 2017 - Present
Hong Kong Student Association, Purdu e University , Secretary, Jan 2018 - Dec 2018

Project Experience
Roundabout Project, West Lafayette, Indiana: Wo rked with the City Engineer to analyze the new roundabout in the city. Proposed solutions and improvements for the roundabout.

Baseball field, Ros emont , Illinois: Design a 100-year, 1-hour drainage and sanitary system for the stadium according to IBC and ASCE,  provide a technical  report related on the field of structural, geotechnlcal and  construction  for  a 3-level  open  parking garage following the Chicago building code and PCI. Proposal for changes stadium design, function and perform benefit-cost analysis.

Groundwater flow Pro ject: Using a finite method in excel and Plaxis-2D to find the seepage flow, factor of safety for the piping, sliding and overturning for the maximum upstream level in the Allegheny reservoir dam.

Designed a fully furnished 5 story-25 units apartment complex In AutoCAD, prepared CAD drawing and constructed in Revlt.

The following are projects perfo rmed by Rayl Engineering and Surveying , LLC and/or by principal Alan Rayl, PE, PSM in close proxim ity to Lake Ashton I, Lake Wales, or in Polk County.

Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC is the current District Engineer for the Lake Ashton II Community Development District. We have provided a variety of services to the CDD including a pavement and
curb line assessment and inventory, Pickleball court design and permitting, pond repair recommendations, and more.

Pavement and Curbline Assessment and Inventory - Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC reviews all of the pavement and curbline conditions within Lake Ashton II CDD. The assessment noted any broken, sunken, and/or areas with impaired function. Once assessed, Rayl Engineering and Surveying,  LLC compiled a recommended repair list. A Pav ement Condition  Index assessment  was completed  to  score the condition of the road network. Each roadway was given a score base d off of condition factors . Once scored, the roads were assigned a recommended action. This assessment resulted in a  200+ page  report for the Lake Ashton II CDD.

Lake Ashton II Pickleba/1 Courts and Parking Lot - Serving as District Engineer for the Lake Ashton II Community Development District we have worked on numerous projects including the design, permitting, and development of two new Pickleball courts and ancillary parking lot at their existing Health and Fitness Center.

Lake Ashton II Pond Repair - Recommend and supervise maintenance and repairs to over 30 stormwater  ponds as part of the Lake  Ashton  II COD Master Surface Water Management System. Once repairs were completed, the project received a permit compliant certification from SWFWMD.

Lake Ashton II SWFWMD Permit Certifications- Ongoing monitoring of Surface Water Management System as part of continued required SWFWMD certifications.

Lime Avenue, Dundee, FL- Surveyed the existing conditions in the affected areas including roadway edge of pavement, driveways, driveway culverts, swales, storm structures and other related features. Created a construction plan and design for remediating the conditions causing the flooding. This included driveway culvert maintenance, establishment of roadside swales with positive outfall, installation of new driveway culverts in areas where they do not currently exist, and other related improvements. Construction Phase services included staking, inspection, observation, as-built and record drawing preparation, and certifications of construct ion .

Dundee Paving RFP, Dundee, FL-Assisted the Town with the writing of the RFP for milling and resurfacing over approximately 3/4 miles of local and collector roadways inside the Town lim it s. Reviews and evaluated contractors' bids and  made  recommendations for  bid a ward. Worked with contractor  during  construction  for  scheduling  coordination, reviewed pay requests, and provided post construction review of completed project.
category 2:	Consultant's Past Performance Continued

Aldi Shopping Center, US 27 & Thompson Nursery Road, Lake Wales - Design and permitting of the master infrastructure (road, drives, sewer, water, stormwater, and flood plain) for the Aldi anchored shopping center. Permit coordination  with Polk County,  SWFWMD,  and FOOT. (*Services  were performed in assistance to Sloan Engineering Group)

McGuire KIA, US 27, Lake Wales - 26,000 square foot dealership with 260 display spaces opened in 2019. (*Services were performed in assistance to Sloan Engineering Group)

Wawa, Lake Wales - Site design, plans, and permitting through the City of Lake Wales, Polk County and SWFMD for roadway improvements and right-of-way dedication in the Chalet Suzanne right-of-way. (*Services were performed in assistance to Sloan Engin eering Group)

Traditions Subdivision, Winter Haven - Served both the developer (Lennar) and the HOA wit h miscellaneous services including flooding remediation and sho re l ine enhancement project s.

Ayersworth Glen (Highland Estates COD District Engineer) - District Engineer for the 1660 lot Highland Estates CDD in  Hillsborough  County,  from  Inception  to  2009.  (*Services  were performed in assistance to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.)

Polk County (2012-2015)- Served as Polk County Engin eer in charge ofrevlew and approval of all development projects within Polk County. Consult ant' s de signs were reviewed by staff for compliance with the Polk County Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Code, and the Utilities Code.

Category 3:	Geographic Location (Weight 20 Points)
Since being founded in 2009, Rayl Engineering & Surveying, LLC has been headquartered in Bartow, FL . Our office is 16 miles from the Lake Ashton Community Deve lopment Dist rict. The owner of Rayl Engineering & Surveying, LLC, Alan L. Ra yl, is available at al l times via phone, email, or text. When sub­ consultants are needed to provide specialize d expe rt ise (Geotechnical, Environmental, etc.) local
professi onals are used to the greatest degree pract ica ble.

Category 4:	Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements (Weight 15 Points)
Our success is a byproduct ofour Client's success.  This comes  from our ability to  provide  responsive, timely service with the greatest amount of Professional expertise and care for fees that meet our Client's budget expectat ions. By not keeping a large in-hou se staff or high overhead, we can pass on these
eff iciencies to our Clients to bring their projects to fr uit ion.

Category 5:	Certified Minority Business Enterprise (Weight 5 Points)
Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC is not a certified Minority Business Enterprise.

Category 6:	Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads (Weight 5 Points)
Rayl Engineering and Surveying, LLC is curren t ly at 100% of workload capacity for October, 90% of workload capacity for November, and has a projected work load capacity of 75% for December 2019 and January 2020. Ray l Engineering and Surveying, LLC is adequately staffed for current and future expected work load. We also have the ability to partner with ot her consultants if special circumsta nces warrant

Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads

100

0
October '19	November '19	December '20	January '20

Category 7:	Volume of Work Previously Awarded to Consultant by coo (Weight 5 Points)
Rayl Engineer ing and Surveying, LLC has not been awarded any work by the Lake Ashton Community Deve lopment District to date.

735 East Main Street Bartow, FL 33830
Phone: 863-537-790 1
www.raylengineering.com

RESOLUTION 2020-01

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, hereinafter referred to as the "Board", of the Lake Ashton Community Development  District, hereinafter  referred to  as "District", adopted a General Fund Budget for fiscal year 2019, and

WHEREAS, the Board desires to reallocate funds budgeted to re-appropriate Revenues and Expenses approved during the Fiscal Year.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LAKE ASHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO THE FOLLOWING:

The General Fund Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Exhibit "A" attached.

This resolution shall become effective this 18th day of November, 2019 and be reflected in the monthly and fiscal Year End 9/30/19  Financial  Statements  and Audit Report of the District.

Lake Ashton
Community Development District

by:	 	
Chairman

Attest:

by:			 Secretary

	Lake Ashton
Community Development District
Budget Amendment						
	FY 2019						
	General Fund						
			Proposed				
		Current	(Increase/		Amended		
	Category	Budget	Decrease)		Budget		
	
Revenues						
	Entertainment Fees	$130,000	$25,770		$155,770		
	Newsletter Ad Revenue	$55,000	$32,036		$87,036		
	Insurance Proceeds	$0	$61,190		$61,190		
Total Revenues		 	$118,996						
Expenditures							
Engineering Fees	$15,000	$14,413	$29,413				
Attorney Fees	$25,000	$22,801	$47,801				
Newsletter Printing	$35,000	$4,308	$39,308				
Contingency-Golf Course	$0	$51,527	$51,527				
Security/Fire Alarm/Gate Repairs	$5,100	$4,814	$9,914				
Water	$12,000	$6,018	$18,018				
Gas	$17,000	$4,755	$21,755				
Pool and Fountain Maintenance	$20,000	$3,577	$23,577				
Landscape Maintenance	$176,007	$1,954	$177,961				
Special Events	$130,000	$4,829	$134,829				
Total Expenditures		 	$118,996 					
LAKE ASHTON

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT	DISTRICT	
Check Run Summary		
November 18, 2019		

Date	Check Numbers	
Amount	

General Fund		
10/15/2019	6798-6803	$22,900.08	
10/25/2019	6804-6808	$61,843.22	
10/30/2019	6809-6831	$46,001.97	
11/5/2019	6832-6833	$15,025.28	
11/7/2019	6834	$500.00	
General Fund Total	$146,270.55	

Capital Projects Fund		
10/30/2019	286-287	$13,085.00	
Capital Projects Fund Total	$13,085.00	
AP300R
*** CHECK NOS. 006798-050000
YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON CDD - GF
BANK A LAKE ASHTON - GF
RUN 11/07/19	PAGE	1
CHECK VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO  DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
10/15/19 00062	10/01/19 05794960 201910 320-57200-41000
SVCS 09/30 THRU 10/29/19
BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS
310-51300-54000
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY 310-51300-49200
SVCS THRU 8/2019
10/14/19 87967	201909 310-51300-49200
SVCS THRU 09/19
10/14/19 87968	201909 310-51300-49200
DISBURSEMENTS
9/30/19 87561	201908 310-51300-49200
SVCS THRU 8/2019
10/14/19 87967	201909 310-51300-49200
SVCS THRU 09/19
10/14/19 87968	201909 310-51300-49200
DISBURSEMENTS
9/20/19 87560	201908 310-51300-31500
LEGAL FEES - AUG 2019
9/30/19 87561	201908 310-51300-49200
SVCS THRU 8/2019
10/14/19 87967	201909 310-51300-31500
SVCS THRU 09/19
10/14/19 87968	201909 310-51300-49200
DISBURSEMENTS
LATHAM, SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE,LLP
102019	201910 320-57200-49400
SPECIAL EVENTS FY2020
ANDREW MATCHETT
06540009 201909 320-57200-43300
SVCS 09/01 THRU 09/30/19
REPUBLIC SERVICES #654
102019	201910 320-57200-49400
DOO WOP REUNION 3/25/2020
WILLIAM CLARE ENTERTAINMENT
10/25/19 00055	10/15/19 20735-10 201909 320-57200-43100
ASHTON CLUB DRIVE-09/19 10/15/19 20740-10 201909 320-57200-43100
LAKE ASHTON BLVD-09/19
STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#
*	1,002.22
1,002.22 006798
-  -  -	-   -  -  -	- -  -  -  -  -
*	175.00
175.00 006799
-  -	-   -   -   -   -   -   -   - -  -	-
*	594.00
*	4,343.72
*	22.52
V	594.00-
V	4,343.72-
V	22.52-
*	1,011.00
*	594.00
*	3,332.72
*	22.52
4,960.24 006800
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   - -  -	-   -   -  -
*	5,000.00
5,000.00 006801
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*	387.62
387.62 006802
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*	11,375.00
11,375.00 006803
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -	-
*	709.05
*	37.45
LAKA LAKE ASHTON	SROSINA
AP300R
*** CHECK NOS. 006798-050000
YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON CDD - GF
BANK A LAKE ASHTON - GF
RUN 11/07/19	PAGE	2
CHECK VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
10/15/19 22109-10 201909 320-57200-43100
GATE ENTRANCE-IRRIGA 9/19 10/15/19 37767-10 201909 320-57200-43100
PALMS CDD IRRIGA - 9/19
STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#
*	862.78
*	174.60
CITY OF LAKE WALES
10/25/19 00502	10/01/19 1582	201910 320-57200-34501
MAIN GATE OFFICER 10/19 10/01/19 1582	201910 320-57200-34501
PATROL OFFICER
10/01/19 1582	201910 320-57200-34501
SPECIAL EVENTS 9/19
COMMUNITY WATCH SOLUTIONS, LLC
10/25/19 00215	10/15/19 368	201908 320-57200-54000
DUES&SUBCRIP CLOSING 9/01 10/15/19 368	201908 320-57200-51000
POSTAGE
10/15/19 368	201908 320-57200-49400
SPECIAL EVENTS
10/15/19 368	201908 320-57200-52000
OPERATING SUPPLIES
10/15/19 368	201908 320-57200-51000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10/15/19 368	201908 320-57200-54500
CLUBHSE MAINT
10/22/19 373	201910 320-57200-34000
PAYROLL REIMB EMPLO 10/19
1,783.88 006804
-   -  -   -   -   -	- - - - - - - -
*	10,044.00
*	7,533.00
*	465.75
18,042.75 006805
-   -  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - -  -	- -
*	169.56
*	31.99
*	346.65
*	790.86
*	7.48
*	245.45
*	22,770.17
GMS-CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLC	24,362.16 006806
10/25/19 00217	10/14/19 0654-000 201911 320-57200-43300
REFUSE SVC 11/01-11/30/19
*	615.91
REPUBLIC SERVICES #654	615.91 006807
10/25/19 00061	10/14/19 102019	201910 320-57200-43000
ELECTRIC 10/19
*	17,038.52

10/30/19 00522

10/30/19 00057
TECO
9/25/19 30968634 201909 320-57200-43200
POOL HEAT
AMERIGAS
9/30/19 180321	201909 320-53800-46800
MONTHLY SVC 9/19

*	575.35

*	1,545.00
17,038.52 006808

575.35 006809
APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT, INC.	1,545.00 006810

LAKA LAKE ASHTON	SROSINA
AP300R
*** CHECK NOS. 006798-050000
YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON CDD - GF
BANK A LAKE ASHTON - GF
RUN 11/07/19	PAGE	3
CHECK VEND#	.....INVOICE........EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE		DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
26545	201909 320-57200-34500
12'LED ARM INSTALL KIT
STATUS
AMOUNT
....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#
AT SERVICES OF NORTH FLORIDA
145169	201910 320-57200-54501
SVC 10/19
COUNTRY BOY PEST CONTROL
50098	201910 320-57200-49400
SEASON TICKETS
CROMER PRESS
10158	201910 320-57200-43000
TECO TAMPA ELECTRIC RENEW
EGIS INSURANCE ADVISORS,LLC
6-775-98 201910 310-51300-42000
DELIVERIES THRU 10/16/19
FEDEX
FS44695	201910 320-57200-54500 EQUIPMENT MAINT
FITNESS SERVICES OF FLORIDA
190854	201910 320-57200-34500
ALARM MONITORING
THE HARTLINE ALARM COMPANY, INC.
19888	201910 320-57200-45300
INSTALL NEW PUMPBODY SPA
HEARTLAND COMMERCIAL POOL SERVICES
1593	201910 320-57200-54500
REPAIR FURRING STRIPS
HERITAGE SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC
1654189	201910 320-57200-52000
PVC CARDS/SHIPPING/FREIGH
IDWHOLESALER
48413	201910 320-57200-54500
REPAIR/MAINT GUARD STATIO
JURIN ROOFING SERVICES, INC
1725292	201911 320-57200-41000
EMERG LINE 11/01-11/30/19
KINGS III OF AMERICA, INC.
AP300R
*** CHECK NOS. 006798-050000
YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON CDD - GF
BANK A LAKE ASHTON - GF
RUN 11/07/19	PAGE	4
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE........EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
10/30/19 00149	10/06/19 45603759 201910 320-57200-54000
SUBSCRIPTION RENEW
STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#
*	309.46

10/30/19 00361

10/30/19 00538

10/30/19 00586
THE LEDGER (NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION)
10/07/19 168963	201910 320-57200-54500
REPAIRS/MAINT
10/16/19 169447	201910 320-57200-54500
REPAIRS/MAINT
MILLER'S CENTRAL AIR, INC.
8/30/19 204982	201908 320-57200-54500
CART REPAIRS
PERFORMAMCE PLUS CARTS
9/26/19 092619	201909 320-57200-54500
INSTALL 16 PROGRAM RACKS
309.46 006823
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -	- -
*	220.00
*	177.50
397.50 006824
-   -   -   -   -	- - - - - - -
*	284.55
284.55 006825
-   -   -   -	- - - - - - - - -
*	350.00
S. FRED POWELL
10/30/19 00571	11/01/19 26982	201911 320-57200-54500
JANITORIAL SVCS

*	3,030.00
350.00 006826

10/30/19 00234
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
9/25/19 16257509 201909 320-57200-51000
SUPPLIES
9/25/19 16257509 201909 320-57200-52000
SUPPLIES

*	260.71
*	495.29
3,030.00 006827
STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT
10/30/19 00430	10/07/19 50075979 201910 310-51300-42502
COPIER LEASE

*	162.50
756.00 006828

10/30/19 00587

10/30/19 00445
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL SERVICE
10/28/19 10096	201909 320-57200-54500
MONITORING 9/01-9/30/19
XS BOWLING SERVICE LLC
5/01/19 OS 21721 201905 320-57200-46200 MAINT 5/19
9/30/19 OS 53625 201909 320-57200-46200 REPLACE PUMPS CONTACTOR
10/01/19 OS 56958 201910 320-57200-46200 MAINT 10/19

*	1,247.50

*	533.15
*	456.40
*	13,667.25
162.50 006829

1,247.50 006830
YELLOWSTONE LANDSCAPE
11/05/19 00020	11/01/19 002700-1 201911 310-51300-31400
FOLIO# 1274590.0000

*	13,325.28
14,656.80 006831
JOE G. TEDDER, TAX COLLECTOR	13,325.28 006832
AP300R
*** CHECK NOS. 006798-050000
YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON CDD - GF
BANK A LAKE ASHTON - GF
RUN 11/07/19	PAGE	5
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE........EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO  DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
11/05/19 00449	11/04/19 2670	201911 320-57200-49400
HOLIDAY LIGHT 50% DEPOSIT
STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#
*	1,700.00
SIGNATURE LIGHTING
11/07/19 00622	11/09/19 110919	201911 320-57200-49400
11/9/19 ENTERTAINMENT
1,700.00 006833
*	500.00
SOUTHBOUND BAND	500.00 006834

TOTAL FOR BANK A TOTAL FOR REGISTER
146,270.55
146,270.55

LAKA LAKE ASHTON	SROSINA
AP300R
*** CHECK NOS. 000286-050000
YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER LAKE ASHTON CDD - CPF
BANK BLAKE ASHTON - CPF
RUN 11/07/19	PAGE	1
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE........EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS
STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#
10/30/19 00040

10/30/19 00093
9/30/19 1151748	201909 600-53800-60097
REPLACE MAIN WATER HEATER 9/30/19 1151749	201909 600-53800-60097
REPLACE BOOSTER HEATER
A.D. BAYNARD PLUMBING INC.
9/30/19 168573	201909 600-53800-60096
REPAIR DAMAGED ASPH AREAS
*	7,840.00
*	3,105.00

*	2,140.00

10,945.00 000286
SEMINOLE ASPHALT PAVING INC	2,140.00 000287

TOTAL	FOR	BANK B	13,085.00	
TOTAL	FOR	REGISTER	13,085.00	

LAKA LAKE ASHTON	SROSINA
FY 2019 CASH RECEIPTS

	October-18	November-18	December-18	January-19	February-19	March-19	
ENTERTAINMENT	$	103,946.00	$	18,210.00	$	5,660.00	$	3,245.00	$	2,815.00	$	3,993.00	
BALLROOM RENTAL	$	2,200.00	$	4,600.00	$	3,700.00	$	14,050.00	$	7,030.00	$	4,950.00	
BALLROOM RENTAL-DEFERRED	$	5,950.00	$	.	$	.	$	5,875.00	$	1,000.00	$	.	
DAMAGE DEPOSITS	$	1,000.00	$	2,000.00	$	(500.00)	$	1,650.00	$	(500.00)	$	1,500.00	
NEWSLETTER INCOME	$	19,821.76	$	7,312.38	$	7,237.89	$	8,989.81	$	11,877.03	$	5,587.31	
COFFEE INCOME	$	750.00	$	300.00	$	100.00	$	725.00	$	250.00	$	250.00	
CLERICAL	$	196.00	$	178.25	$	157.00	$	68.00	$	155.00	$	223.00	
SECURITY FEE	$	1,562.50	$	1,312.50	$	306.25	$	625.00	$	593.75	$	512.50	
ENTRANCE GATE OPENERS	$	296.00	$	444.00	$	222.00	$	111.00	$	148.00	$	111.00	
MISCELLANEOUS	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	32.40	$	.	$	61,311.02	
	$	135,722.26	$	34,357.13	$	16,883.14	$	35,371.21	$	23,368.78	$	78,437.83	

	April-19	May-19	June-19	July-19	August-19	September-19	
ENTERTAINMENT	$	4,284.00	$	1,931.81	$	1,530.00	$	2,891.00	$	5,436.00	$	966.00	
ENTERTAINMENT-DEFERRED	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	6,844.00	
BALLROOM RENTAL	$	4,000.00	$	7,550.00	$	3,350.00	$	2,000.00	$	8,300.00	$	1,600.00	
BALLROOM RENTAL-DEFERRED	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	1,750.00	$	4,000.00	$	8,000.00	
DAMAGE DEPOSITS	$	(500.00)	$	3,500.00	$	2,000.00	$	(3,000.00)	$	2,500.00	$	(2,500.00)	
NEWSLETTER INCOME	$	4,233.31	$	7,004.81	$	4,819.81	$	4,092.31	$	5,974.81	$	360.00	
NEWSLETTER INCOME-DEFERRED	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	2,221.25	$	5,472.50	
COFFEE INCOME	$	437.50	$	687.50	$	225.00	$	700.00	$	375.00	$	500.00	
COFFEE INCOME-DEFERRED	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	$	.	
CLERICAL	$	279.00	$	266.38	$	87.00	$	460.00	$	72.75	$	56.00	
SECURITY FEE	$	300.00	$	2,457.50	$	1,135.00	$	982.50	$	1,705.00	$	575.00	
SECURITY FEE-DEFERRED	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	
ENTRANCE GATE OPENERS	$	407.00	$	259.00	$	148.00	$	185.00	$	259.00	$	222.00	
INSURANCE PROCEEDS	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	$	.	
MISCELLANEOUS	$	.	$	.	$	246.00	$	25.00	$	2,661.63	$	200.00	
RESTAURANT LEASE	$	.	$	.	$	930.00	$	930.00	$	930.00	$	930.00	
SALES TAX PAYABLE	$	.	$	.	$	70.00	$	70.00	$	70.00	$	70.00	
	$	13,440.81	$	23,657.00	$	14,540.81	$	11,085.81	$	34,505.44	$	23,295.50	

FISCAL YEAR 2019 TOTAL		
ENTERTAINMENT FEES	$	154,907.81	
ENTERTAINMENT FEES-DEFERRED	$	6,844.00	
BALLROOM RENTAL	$	63,330.00	
BALLROOM RENTAL-DEFERRED	$	26,575.00	
DAMAGE DEPOSITS	$	7,150.00	
NEWSLETTER INCOME	$	87,311.23	
NEWSLETTER INCOME-DEFERRED	$	7,693.75	
COFFEE INCOME	$	5,300.00	
CLERICAL	$	2,198.38	
SECURITY FEE	$	12,067.50	
ENTRANCE GATE OPENERS	$	2,812.00	
MISCELLANEOUS	$	64,476.05	
RESTAURANT LEASE	$	3,720.00	
SALES TAX PAYABLE	$	280.00	
	$	444,665.72	

ENTERTAINMENT
ENTERTAINMENT (CONTINUED)
9/25/2019	902	Unlimited Property Solutions	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/26/2019	903	Brooks	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/27/2019	904	Decker	$	36.00	Monster Mash October 25, 2019	
9/30/2019	905	Everything Solar	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/30/2019	905	Central Window Sales	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/30/2019	905	Kennedy	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 28565	Kincaid	$	35.00	!:lame Exoo - October 25, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 32614	Ridge Energy Savers	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 8628	Ziegler	$	15.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 1029	Holmes	$	15.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 1218	Brooks	$	30.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK455	Harrison	$	72.00	Monster Mash - October 18, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK4806	Cruz	$	18.00	Monster Mash - October 18, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 3255	Hynoski	$	288.00	Monster Mash - October 18, 2019	
9/6/2019	CK 8325	Boruschewutz	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 18, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK4670	Dwyer	$	18.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK273	Fleming	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 1711	Savala	$	60.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 2382	Dramatic Design & Decor	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 337	Totten	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 2133	Hinds	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 7772	Saint-Sommer	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 6434	Giebler	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 2025	Borckardt	$	30.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 7674	Robinson	$	30.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK 2626	Dornhecker	$	15.00	Liverpool Live - September 13, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK 1555	Unda	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK 52745	Miller's Central Air	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK583	Prusiecki	$	72.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK 2993	Decrees	$	72.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK 260	McClure	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/20/2019	CK 2403	Wyckoff	$	36.00	Monster Mash - October 25, 2019	
9/27/2019	CK 2841	Jack Hall Jr's Construction	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/27/2019	CK 008366	Yauchler Properties	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
9/27/2019	CK 13096	Bum's Flooring	$	35.00	Home Expo - October 25, 2019	
TOTAL			$	7,810.00		

RENTALS
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
8/30/2018	655	Rosa Thomas	$	1,000.00	Room Rental - 9/21/19	
9/11/2019	894	Kagali	$	1,750.00	BR Rental - November 15, 2019	
9/13/2019	CK 1179	LA Bingo	$	1,600.00	September Rent	
9/19/2019	898	Baez	$	1,750.00	Baez/Rubio Wedding -January 4, 2020	
9/20/2019	CK 100023594061	LWCS	$	1,750.00	BR Rental -April 24, 2020 - LWCS Gala	
9/26/2019	903	Pruthi	$	1,750.00	BR Rental - February 15, 2020	
TOTAL			$	9,600.00		

NEWSLETTER
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
9/6/2019	CK 06528191	Edward Jones - Mike Kennedv	$	360.00	September LAT Ad	
9/6/2019	CK 06528191	Edward Jones - Mike Kennedy	$	360.00	October LAT Ad	
9/20/2019	CK 50753	United Refrigeration	$	275.00	LAT Insert & Ad - October Issue	
9/23/2019	900	Dan's City Fan's	$	200.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	Art's Golf Carts	$	360.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	Blackburn Interiors	$	400.00	LAT Ad - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	Florida Dermatology	$	350.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	Jim's Floor Depot	$	200.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	MD Construction	$	360.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	Performance Plus Carts	$	360.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	ServPro	$	212.50	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/24/2019	901	Window World of Polk County	$	1,170.00	LAT AD - October 2019 - September 2020	
9/27/2019	904	Miller's Central Air	$	175.00	LAT Insert - October Issue	
9/27/2019	904	Family Elder Law	$	350.00	LAT AD - October Issue	
9/27/2019	904	Brookdale	$	175.00	LAT Insert - October Issue	
9/27/2019	CK 06551456	Edward Jones - Matt Simpson	$	175.00	LAT Insert - Otober Issue	
9/27/2019	CK 1434	Abraham-Tindell	$	175.00	LAT Insert- Otober Issue	
9/27/2019	CK 3336	Iceberg AC	$	175.00	IAT Insert - Otober Issue	
TOTAL			$	5,832.50		

CLERICAL
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
9/6/2019	Cash	Cash	$	15.00	Directories, Copies, Faxes	
9/13/2019	Cash	Cash	$	31.00	Directories, Copies, Faxes	
9/13/2019	Cash	Cash	$	10.00	Directories, Copies, Faxes	
TOTAL			$	56.00		

COFFEE
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
9/6/2019	891	Ligon Marketing - FL Derm.	$	100.00	Monday Coffee - September 30, 2019	
9/26/2019	903	America's Best Hearing	$	100.00	Monday Coffee - October 21, 2019	
9/27/2019	904	Morgan Stanley - Matt Grubb	$	100.00	Monday Coffee - October 28, 2019	
9/27/2019	Cash	Denton	$	100.00	Monday Coffee -August 23, 2019	
9/27/2019	CK 06551456	Edward Jones - Matt Simpson	$	100.00	Monday Coffee - 10/14/2019	
TOTAL			$	500.00		

DEPOSITS
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
9/9/2019	892	Molina	$	{1,000.00)	Molina - 9/7 /19 - DD Refund - Minus $12.50 overages securitv	
9/16/2019	896	Coconato	$	{1,000.00)	DD Refund - Coconato Wedding - 9/14/19 - Minus $31.25 overages security	
9/23/2019	900	Thomas	$	(500.00)	Thomas Wedding DD Refund - 9/21/2019 - Minus - $43.75 overages security	
TOTAL			$	(2,500.00)		

ENTRANCE GATE OPENERS
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
9/9/2019	892	Weaver	$	37.00	Gate Opener #38	
9/13/2019	Cash	Beaver	$	37.00	Gate Opener# 40045Hind	
9/16/2019	896	Brenneman	$	37.00	Gate Opener #40046	
9/19/2019	898	Norma Haring	$	37.00	Gate Ooener #40047	
9/30/2019	905	Gieger	$	74.00	Gate Openers #40048 & 40049	
TOTAL			$	222.00		

RESTAURANT LEASE/SALES TAXES

DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION

9/20/2019	CK 1680	NiNi's At Lake Ashton	$	1,000.00 Restaurant Rent -September
TOTAL	$	1,000.00

SECURITY
DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION	
9/6/2019	Cash	Oralia Gutierrez	$	70.00	Overage In Security -August 31, 2019	
9/9/2019	892	Molina	$	12.50	Molina - 9/7/19 - DD Refund - Minus $12.50 overages security	
9/16/2019	896	Coconato	$	31.25	DD Refund - Coconato Wedding - 9/14/19 - Minus $31.25 overages security	
9/19/2019	898	Jackson	$	417.50	Security Fee -Jackson Wedding Seotember 28, 2019	
9/23/2019	900	Thomas	$	43.75	Thomas Wedding DD Refund -9/21/2019 - Minus -$43.75 overages security	
TOTAL			$	575.00		

MISCELLANEOUS

DATE	DESCRIPTION	NAME	AMOUNT	DESCRIPTION

9/6/2019	Cash	Oralia Gutierrez	$	200.00 Clean Up - August 31, 2019 Event
TOTAL	$	200.00

!TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS -SEPTEMBER 2019	$	23,295.50

SUMMARY		
ENTERTAINMENT	$	966.00	
ENTERTAINMENT-DEFERRED	$	6,844.00	
ROOM RENTALS	$	1,600.00	
ROOM RENTALS-DEFERRED	$	8,000.00	
NEWSLETTER	$	360.00	
NEWSLETTER-DEFERRED	$	5,472.50	
CLERICAL	$	56.00	
COFFEE	$	500.00	
DEPOSITS	$	(2,500.00)	
ENTRANCE GATE OPENER	$	222.00	
RESTAURANT/SALES TAXES	$	1,000.00	
SECURITY	$	575.00	
MISCELLANEOUS	$	200.00	
TOTAL	$	23,295.50	
LAKE ASHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Special Assessment Receipts
Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2019

O&M	Debt	i
Date	Collection	O&M	O&M	Debt Svc	Debt Svc    Discounts/     Discounts/   Commissions   Property	Net Amount
Received	Period	Receipts	Interest	Receipts	Interest	Penalties	Penalties	Paid	Appraiser	Received I

$1,690,408.26	$453,343.65	$53,043.42	$506,387.07
.36300.10100	2015-1	2015-2
General Fund	Debt Svc Fund	Debt Svc Fund	Debt Total
100.00%	89.525%	10.475%	100%

11/14/2018	10/01/18-10/31/18   $	1,714.41   $	$	$	$	68.58   $	$	32.92   $	$	1,612.91 I       i  $	1,612.91    !$	$	$
11/20/2018	06/01/18-10/31/18   $     26,617.65   $	$    9,016.16   $	$  1,403.73    $    476.16   $	675.08   $	$      33,078.84  :  $	24,694.46    \$	7,506.13   $	878.25    $   8,384.39
11/23/2018	11/01/18-11/04/18   $    24,001.74   $	$    8,564.24   $	$      960.12    $    342.57   $	625.26   $	$     30,638.03 .1·     $	22,560.49	$	7,231.43   $	846.11    $    8,077.54
11/30/2018	11/05/18-11/11/18	$ 303,798.09	$	$   72,740.32    $	$12,148.93    $   2,907.96    $    7,229.63    $	$    354,251.89  1            .   $	286,086.04     :$	61,025.56     $	7,140.29 $ 68,165.85											
12/11/2018	11/12/18-11/21/18	$ 434,057.24	$	$ 124,992.97    $	$17,312.39     $   4,971.36     $ 10,735.33    $	$    526,031.13 I    $	408,484.14	$	105,234.09    $	12,312.90 $117,546.99											
12/27/2018	ll/22/18-11/30/18	$ 685,782.71	$	$215,517.99    $	$27,389.31     $   8,603.13   $  17,306.17	$    848,002.09 I  $	645,076.51    :$	181,669.38    $	21,256.20 $ 202,925.59											
1/14/2019	12/01/18-12/31/18	$ 72,331.73	$	$ 25,152.20	$	$ 2,191.02	$ 752.40	$ 1,890.81	$ 92,649.70	$	68,685.75	$	21,453.75	$	2,510.19 $ 23,963.95		
1/31/2019	INTEREST	$	$1,929.68	$	$566.91	$	$	$	$	2,496.59	$	1,929.68	$	507.53	$	59.38   $	566.91		
2/15/2019	01/01/19-01/31/19	$ 39,431.43	$	$ 11,693.82	$	$ 788.67	$ 233.90	$ 1,002.06	$ 49,100.62	$	37,871.68	$	10,052.72	$	1,176.22 $ 11,228.93		
3/15/2019	02/01/19-02/28/19   $     10,633.97   $	$ 5,419.41 $	$ 102.85	$	52.65	$	317.96	$ 15,579.92	$	10,286.46	$	4,738.98	$	554.48	$ 5,293.47						
4/15/2019	03/01/19-03/31/19   $     84,747.18   $	$ 31,081.79 $	$	68.58	$	$ 2,315.21	$ 113,445.18	$	82,897.07	$	27,348.23	$	3,199.88	$ 30,548.11						
4/26/2019	INTEREST	$	$ 131.64	$	$ 47.12	$	$	$	$	178.76	$	131.64	$	42.18	$	4.94	$	47.12	
5/15/2019	04/01/19-04/30/19	$	5,577.70	$	$ 1,442.34	$	$ (102.86)	$	(22.98)	$	142.92	$	7,002.96	$	5,570.59	$	1,282.34	$	150.04	$ 1,432.38	
6/18/2019	06/01/19-06/01/19	$	1,714.41	$	$	765.82	$	$	(77.15)	$	(34.46)	$	51.84	$	2,540.00	$	1,751.67	$	705.75	$	82.58	$	788.33	
7/25/2019	INTEREST	$	$	22.97    $	$ 7.12	$	$	$	$	30.09 :	$	22.97	$	6.37	$	0.75	$	7.12								
8/7/2019	PROP APPRAISER   $	$	$	$	$	$	$ 24,376.48	$ (24,376.48):.	$	(19,369.08)	$	(4,482.88)	$	(524.52)	$ (5,007.40)								
$	$	' i $	$	$	$													

$ 1,690,408.26     $2,084.29      $506,387.06      $ 621.15      $62,254.17      $18,282.69      $ 66,701.65     $	$  2,052,262.25 i  '$	1,578,292.99    ,:  $	424,321.57    $	49,647.69       $473,969.26

BALANCE REMAINING	$0.00	$0.01	l_.}	_j
Gross Percent Collected	100.00%
   Balance Due	$0.01 

      COMMUNITY  DEVELOPMENT  DISTRICT	
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
September 30, 2019

 	Major Funds		Total
Debt	Capital	Governmental
 	General	Service	Reserve	Funds	

ASSETS:
Cash-Wells Fargo	
$227,820		
$37,639	
$265,458	
Due from Other Funds	$8,571			$8,571	
Investment - State Board	$258,270			$258,270	
Investment - State Board Capital Reserve
Investments:			$261,919	$261,919	
Series 2015					
Reserve A		$232,063		$232,063	
Interest A		$2		$2	
Revenue A		$134,744		$134,744	
Prepayment A-1		$70,492		$70,492	
Prepayment A-2		$22,487		$22,487	
Prepaid Expenses	$39,544			$39,544	

TOTAL ASSETS	 	$534,205	$459,788	$299,557	$1,293,550

LIABILITIES:		
Accounts Payable	$31,634	$13,715	$45,349	
Due to Other Funds	$8,571	$8,571	
Sales Tax Payable	$280	$280	
Deposits-Restaurant	$6,000	$6,000	
Deposits-Room Rentals	$3,475	$3,475	
Deferred Revenue	 	$41,038	$41,038	
TOTAL LIABILITIES	 	$82,427	$8,571	$13,715	$104,713	

FUND BALANCES:
Nonspendable:
Deposits and prepaid items	$39,544	$39,544 Restricted:
Debt Service	$451,216	$451,216
Assigned:

Capital Reserve	$285,842	$285,842				
Unassigned	 	$412,234	$412,234				
TOTAL FUND BALANCES	 	$451,778	$451,216	$285,842	$1,188,837				
TOTAL LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCES	$534,205	$459,788	$299,557	$1,293,550	

DESCRIPTION		ADOPTED BUDGET	PRORATED BUDGET	ACTUAL
 	THRU 09/30/19	THRU 09/30/19	VARIANCE			
REVENUES:					
Special Assessments - Levy (ll	
$1,572,079	
$1,572,079	
$1,578,293	
$6,214	
Rental Income	$50,000	$50,000	$61,455	$11,455	
Entertainment Fees	$130,000	$130,000	$155,770	$25,770	
Newsletter Ad Revenue	$55,000	$55,000	$87,036	$32,036	
Interest Income	$1,000	$1,000	$15,292	$14,292	
Miscellaneous Income	$5,000	$5,000	$26,540	$21,540	
Restaurant Lease	$0	$0	$3,720	$3,720	
Insurance Proceeds	$0	$0	$61,190	$61,190	

TOTAL REVENUES	$1,813,079	 	$1,813,079	$1,989,296	$176,217 

EXPENDITURES:	

ADMINISTRATIVE:						
Supervisor Fees	$3,000	$3,000	$4,400	($1,400}	
FICA Expense	$230	$230	$337	($108)	
Engineering	$15,000	$15,000	$29,413	($14,413)	
Arbitrage	$600	$600	$600	$0	
Dissemination	$1,000	$1,000	$1,500	($500)	
Attorney	$25,000	$25,000	$47,801	($22,801)	
Annual Audit	$4,223	$4,223	$4,200	$23	
Trustee Fees	$4,310	$4,310	$4,310	$0	
Management Fees	$58,482	$58,482	$58,482	$0	
Computer Time	$1,000	$1,000	$1,000	$0	
Postage	$3,500	$3,500	$3,172	$328	
Printing & Binding	$1,350	$1,350	$1,718	($368}	
Newsletter Printing	$35,000	$35,000	$39,308	($4,308)	
Rentals & Leases	$5,000	$5,000	$5,161	($161)	
Insurance	$40,411	$40,411	$36,737	$3,674	
Legal Advertising	$500	$500	$1,099	($599)	
Other Current Charges	$1,250	$1,250	$1,369	($119}	
Contingency-Golf Course	$0	$0	$51,527	($51,527)	
Property Taxes	$12,500	$12,500	$13,180	($680)	
Office Supplies	$100	$100	$77	$23	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$175	$175	$175	$0	
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE	$212,631	$212,631	$305,565	($92,935)	

ADOPTED
DESCRIPTION	BUDGET			PRORATED BUDGET
THRU 09/30/19			ACTUAL
THRU 09/30/19			
VARIANCE		
Field:											
Field Management Services	$332,000			$332,000			$322,240			$9,760		
Gate Attendants	$209,457			$209,457			$208,623			$835		
Pool Attendants	$12,495			$12,495			$6,689			$5,806		
Pest Control	$1,800			$1,800			$1,353			$447		
Security/Fire Alarm/Gate Repairs	$5,100			$5,100			$9,914			($4,814)		
Telephone/Internet	$13,600			$13,600			$13,954			($354)		
Electric	$216,000			$216,000			$198,116			$17,884		
Water	$12,000			$12,000			$18,018			($6,018)		
Gas	$17,000			$17,000			$21,755			($4,755)		
Refuse	$10,000			$10,000			$10,544			($544)		
Clubhouse Maintenance	$110,000			$110,000			$106,806			$3,194		
Pool and Fountain Maintenance	$20,000			$20,000			$23,577			($3,577)		
Landscape Maintenance	$176,007			$176,007			$177,961			($1,955)		
Plant Replacement	$7,000			$7,000			$7,213			($213)		
Irrigation Repairs	$3,500			$3,500			$0			$3,500		
Lake Maintenance	$18,540			$18,540			$18,540			$0		
Wetland  Mitigation and Maintenance	$34,800			$34,800			$32,000			$2,800		
Permits/Inspections	$1,500			$1,500			$2,910			($1,410)		
Office Supplies/Printing/Binding	$5,000			$5,000			$4,962			$38		
Operating Supplies	$25,000			$25,000			$17,529			$7,471		
Credit Card Processing Fees	$3,500			$3,500			$3,832			($332)		
Dues & Subscriptions	$8,500			$8,500			$11,205			($2,705)		
Decorations	$2,000			$2,000			$303			$1,697		
Special Events	$130,000			$130,000			$133,456			($3,456)		
Storm Damage	$0			$0			$2,016			($2,016)		
TOTAL FIELD	$1,374,799			$1,374,799			$1,353,515			$21,284		
											
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$1,587,429			$1,587,429			$1,659,080			{$71,651}		
Excess (deficiency} of revenues											
over (under) expenditures	$225,650			$225,650			$330,216			$104,566		

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/{USES}											
Capital Reserve-Transfer Out	($225,650)			($225,650}			($225,650)			($0)		
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/{USES}	($225,650}			{$225,650}			{$225,650}			($0}		
Net change in fund balance	$0			$0			$104,566			$104,566		
FUND BALANCE - Beginning	$0						
$347,212					
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$0						$451,778					

(ll Assessments are shown net of Discounts and Collection Fees.											
LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS RESERVE FUND
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance For the Period Ended September 30, 2019

DESCRIPTION		ADOPTED
BUDGET		PRORATED BUDGET
THRU 09/30/19		ACTUAL
THRU 09/30/19		
VARIANCE	

REVENUES:									
Interest Income		
$100		
$100		
$8,192		
$8,092	
Capital Reserve-Transfer In FY 19		$225,650		$225,650		$225,650		$0	
TOTAL REVENUES		$225,750		 	$225,750 		 	$233,842 		$8,092	
EXPENDITURES:									
Capital Projects:									
Sand Filtration System for Pool		$25,000		$25,000		$0		$25,000	
Pool Heaters (2)		$20,000		$20,000		$14,914		$5,086	
Pool Tile Replacement		$15,000		$15,000		$0		$15,000	
Activities Desk Upgrade		$8,000		$8,000		$11,872		($3,872)	
Clubhouse & Gate House Camera System Upgrades		$6,000		$6,000		$413		$5,587	
Door Replacement		$5,000		$5,000		$0		$5,000	
Indoor Furniture		$10,000		$10,000		$5,949		$4,051	
Outdoor Furniture		$5,000		$5,000		$3,067		$1,933	
Bocce Ball Court Refurbishment		$10,000		$10,000		$12,272		($2,272)	
Clubhouse Lawn Lighting (Front of Clubhouse)		$15,000		$15,000		$9,723		$5,277	
HVAC		$31,000		$31,000		$13,242		$17,759	
Ice Machine Replacement - Clubhouse Fitness Center Restroom Area		$9,000		$9,000		$5,502		$3,498	
Pavement Management		$165,000		$165,000		$2,140		$162,860	
Restaurant Equipment Allowance		$15,000		$15,000		$15,181		($181)	
Ballroom Sound Equipment		$7,000		$7,000		$0		$7,000	
Stormwater Management		$25,000		$25,000		$169,699		($144,699)	
other Current Charges		$500		$500		$258		$242	

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures

Net change in fund balance FUND BALANCE - Beginning FUND BALANCE - Ending
 $371,500	$371,500	$264,232	$107,268 

($145,750)	($145,750)	($30,390)	$115,360 

($145,750)	($145,750)	($30,390)	$115,360 

$317,610	$316,233

$171,860	$285,842

Page 4
LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SERIES 2015
DEBT SERVICE FUND
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance For the Period Ended September 30, 2019

DESCRIPTION		ADOPTED BUDGET	PRORATED	ACTUAL
   THRU 09/30/19	THRU 09/30/19	VARIANCE			
REVENUES:					
Interest Income	$0	$0	$1,195	$1,195	
Assessments - Levy	$472,609	$472,609	$473,969	$1,360	
Assessments - Prepayments A-1	$0	$0	$73,563	$73,563	
Assessments - Prepayments A-2	$0	$0	$20,694	$20,694	

TOTAL REVENUES	$472,609	 	$472,609	$569,422	$96,813 

TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$473,500	 	$473,500	$532,500	($59,000)

Excess {deficiency) of revenues

over {under) expenditures	($891)	($891)	$36,922	$37,813	

Net change in fund balance	
($891)	
($891)	
$36,922	
$37,813	

FUND BALANCE - Beginning	
$141,984		
$414,295		
FUND BALANCE - Ending	$141,093		$451,216		
LAKE ASHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Long Term Debt Report
FY 2019

Series 2015-1, Special Assessment Bonds			

Interest Rate:	
5.000%		
Maturity Date:	5/1/2025	$1,690,000.00	
Interest Rate:	5.000%		
Maturity Date:	5/1/2032	$2,500,000.00	
Reserve Requirement:	50% Maximum Annual Debt Service		
Bonds outstanding - 9/30/2018		$4,190,000.00	
	November 1, 2018 (Special Call)	($35,000.00)	
	May 1, 2019 (Mandatory)	($210,000.00)	
	May 1, 2019 (Special Call)	($20,000.00)	
Current Bonds Outstanding		$3,925,000.00	

Series  2015-2, Special Assessment Bonds			

Interest Rate:	
5.000%		
Maturity Date:	5/1/2025	$145,000.00	
Interest Rate:	5.000%		
Maturity Date:	5/1/2037	$435,000.00	
Reserve Requirement:	50% Maximum Annual Debt Service		
Bonds outstanding - 9/30/2018		$580,000.00	
	November 1, 2018 (Special Call)	($5,000.00)	
	May 1, 2019 (Mandatory)	($20,000.00)	
	May 1, 2019 (Special Call)	($5,000.00)	
Current Bonds Outstanding		$550,000.00	

Total Current Bonds Outstanding	$4,475,000.00

OCT	NOV	DEC	JAN	FEB	MAR	APR	MAY	JUN	JUL	AUG	SEP	TOTAL	
2018	2018	2018	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019		
Revenues													

Maintenance Assessments	
$0	
$334,959	
$1,053,578	
$70,617	
$37,872	
$10,287	
$83,030	
$5,571	
$1,752	
$23	
($19,396)	
$0	$1,578,293	
Rental Income	$2,200	$4,600	$3,700	$13,175	$5,030	$4,950	$4,000	$7,550	$3,350	$2,000	$8,300	$2,600	$61,455	
Entertainment Fees	$103,946	$17,960	$5,723	$4,745	$2,815	$3,993	$4,284	$1,932	$1,080	$2,891	$5,436	$966	$155,770	
Newsletter Ad Revenue	$19,822	$7,312	$7,238	$8,990	$11,602	$5,587	$4,233	$7,005	$4,820	$4,092	$5,975	$360	$87,036	
Interest Income	$494	$340	$333	$348	$1,593	$2,448	$2,113	$2,102	$1,799	$1,614	$1,254	$855	$15,292	
Miscellaneous Income	$2,805	$2,260	$854	$1,561	$1,109	$1,097	$1,442	$4,520	$1,913	$2,353	$5,073	$1,553	$26,540	
Restaurant Lease	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$930	$930	$930	$930	$3,720	
Insurance Proceeds	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$61,190	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$61,190	
Total Revenues	$129,266	$367,432	$1,071,425	$99,436	$60,021	$89,551	$99,102	$28,680	$15,643	$13,903	$7,572	$7,264	$1,989,29611	

ADMINISTRATIVE:													
Supervisor Fees	$500	$250	$350	$400	$200	$600	$200	$550	$200	$550	$400	$200	$4,400	
FICA Expense	$38	$19	$27	$31	$15	$46	$15	$42	$15	$42	$31	$15	$337	
Engineering	$2,350	$0	$6,108·	$3,280	$2,340	$3,665	$1,410	$470	$0	$705	$9,085	$0	$29,413	
Arbitrage	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$600	$0	$600	
Dissemination	$383	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$183	$83	$183	$83	$83	$1,500	
Attorney	$7,792	$3,525	$4,570	$9,122	$7,529	$4,781	$1,922	$1,649	$135	$2,432	$1,011	$3,333	$47,801	
Consulting Services	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	
Annual Audit	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$4,200	$0	$0	$0	$0	$4,200	
Trustee Fees	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$4,310	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$4,310	
Management Fees	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$4,874	$58,482	
Computer Time	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$83	$1,000	
Travel & Per Diem	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	
Postage	$135	$556	$111	$228	$177	$221	$167	$176	$375	$606	$118	$302	$3,172	
Printing & Binding	$165	$157	$116	$175	$138	$142	$144	$163	$84	$241	$96	$98	$1,718	
Newsletter Printing	$3,284	$3,284	$3,289	$3,511	$3,332	$3,177	$3,332	$3,276	$6,922	$3,040	$0	$2,860	$39,308	
Rentals & Leases	$699	$187	$187	$1,371	$216	$1,187	$163	$0	$163	$325	($212)	$877	$5,161	
Insurance	$36,737	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$36,737	
Legal Advertising	$0	$65	$189	$0	$30	$112	$0	$72	$350	$122	$0	$160	$1,099	
Other Current Charges	$99	$136	$154	$0	$0	$0	$97	$107	$300	$175	$125	$174	$1,369	
Contingency-Golf Course	$0	$2,500	$0	$1,250	$1,250	$1,250	$5,143	$7,778	$26,616	$5,125	$594	$23	$51,527	
Property Taxes	$0	$13,180	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$13,180	
Office Supplies	$13	$15	$3	$8	$7	$6	$10	$9	$7	$0	$0	$0	$77	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$175	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$175	
Total Administrative	$57,328	$28,914	$20,142	$24,416	$20,275	$20,226	$21,952	$23,633	$40,208	$18,503	$16,887	$13,082	$305,56511	

	OCT	NOV	DEC	JAN	FEB	MAR	APR	MAY	JUN	JUL	AUG	SEP	TOTAL	
	2018	2018	2018	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019	2019		

Field:														
Field Management Services	$23,080	$35,266	$24,175	$23,317	$28,520	$28,129	$27,496	$35,122	$25,197	$24,326	$25,528	$22,085	$322,240	
Gate Attendants	$17,921	$17,614	$18,397	$18,320	$16,214	$16,116	$17,010	$17,621	$17,010	$17,621	$17,726	$17,054	$208,623	
Pool Attendants	$0	$0	$878	$864	$729	$824	$675	$1,542	$1,178	$0	$0	$0	$6,689	
Pest Control	$123	$123	$123	$123	$0	$123	$123	$123	$123	$123	$123	$123	$1,353	
Security/Fire Alarm/Gate Repairs	$704	$1,710	$298	$0	$363	$382	$391	$826	$2,616	$0	$158	$2,467	$9,914	
Telephone/Internet	$1,213	$1,079	$1,149	$981	$1,152	$1,529	$1,094	$1,458	$1,109	$1,012	$1,097	$1,080	$13,954	
Electric	$17,236	$17,144	$17,657	$16,125	$16,073	$15,972	$15,189	$15,410	$16,929	$16,837	$16,814	$16,730	$198,116	
Water	$1,010	$1,293	$1,177	$1,214	$1,315	$1,029	$1,167	$1,220	$1,240	$1,870	$1,941	$3,542	$18,018	
Gas	$709	$2,094	$4,545	$4,864	$2,426	$2,903	$1,880	$743	$120	$567	$330	$575	$21,755	
Refuse	$775	$882	$1,379	$388	$868	$876	$876	$909	$889	$901	$901	$901	$10,544	
Clubhouse Maintenance	$5,050	$8,399	$8,911	$7,944	$7,112	$7,701	$16,194	$9,773	$9,171	$12,858	$7,889	$5,803	$106,806	
Pool and Fountain Maintenance	$1,490	$1,490	$1,565	$2,034	$1,571	$2,336	$1,746	$1,546	$3,941	$1,496	$2,866	$1,496	$23,577	
Landscape Maintenance	$14,667	$14,667	$14,667	$14,667	$14,667	$16,401	$14,667	$14,200	$14,276	$17,290	$13,667	$14,124	$177,961	
Plant Replacement	$3,740	$1,114	$0	$0	$0	$275	$234	$0	$1,850	$0	$0	$0	$7,213	
Irrigation Repairs	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	
Lake Maintenance	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$4,345	$1,545	$1,545	$1,545	$21,340	
Wetland Mitigation and Maintenance	$0	$0	$0	$7,300	$0	$7,300	$0	$0	$7,300	$0	$0	$7,300	$29,200	
Permits/Inspections	$0	$0	$0	$462	$0	$1,442	$0	$0	$420	$0	$0	$586	$2,910	
Office Supplies/Printing/Binding	$163	$509	$901	$479	$799	$322	$152	$203	$145	$812	$217	$261	$4,962	
Operating Supplies	$1,102	$1,060	$1,228	$1,226	$2,423	$1,199	$2,006	$1,395	$1,069	$1,838	$2,424	$560	$17,529	
Credit Card Processing Fees	$191	$1,590	$287	$252	$225	$215	$209	$110	$145	$165	$87	$355	$3,832	
Dues & Subscriptions	$445	$255	$998	$521	$492	$318	$97	$3,694	$2,936	$1,052	$397	$0	$11,205	
Decorations	$0	$0	$303	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$303	
Special Events	$8,168	$125	$9,860	$38,147	$10,895	$34,544	$14,071	$5,074	$1,797	$3,793	$2,767	$4,215	$133,456	
Storm Damage	$0	$0	$2,016	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$2,016	
TOTAL FIELD	$99,332	$107,959	$112,057	$140,774	$107,389	$141,478	$116,822	$112,515	$113,805	$104,105	$96,477	$100,802	$1,353,515	

OTHER FINANCING 50URCES/(USE5)														

Capital Reserve-Transfer Out	
$0	
$0	
$0	
$0	
($225,650)	
$0	
$0	
$0	
$0	
$0	
$0	
$0	
($225,650)	
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/{USES}	$0	$0	$0	$0	($225,650)	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	($225,650)11	

Subtotal Operating Expenses	
$156,660	
$136,873	
$132,199	
$165,190	
$353,314	
$161,705	
$138,774	
$136,148	
$154,013	
$122,608	
$113,364	
$113,884	$1,884,731 II	

Excess Revenues (Expenditures)	
($27,394)	
$230,559	
$939,227	($65,754)	($293,293)	($72,153)	($39,672)	($107,468)	($138,370)	($108,705)	($105,792)	($106,620)	
$104,5661