I

MINUTES OF MEETING LAKE ASHTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Lake Ashton Community Development District was held on Monday, August 19, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. at the Lake Ashton Clubhouse Ballroom, 4141 Ashton Club Drive, Lakes Wales, Florida 33859.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Mike Costello Borden Deane Robert Plummer Bob Ference

Also present:
Jillian Burns Andrew d'Adesky Rey Malave Christine Wells Matt Fisher
Numerous residents

Chairman Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Governmental Management Services District Counsel
District Engineer Community Director
Field Operations Manager

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Ms. Burns called the roll and established a quorum was present and led the pledge of allegiance.

SECOND  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Meeting Agenda
Mr. Costello: Ok we need an approval of the meeting agenda.
Mr. Plummer: I would like to make a change in the agenda if we would please. would like to have us move the attorney's report to the first item to speak due to fact that I believe he has some golf issue that he would like to bring up and I know that a fair amount of the people that are here are here about the golf course.	So if we could push that up earlier in the agenda and note that golf course portion, I would appreciate that.
Mr. Costello: Is that in the form of a motion? Mr. Plummer: Yes.

On MOTION by Mr. Plummer seconded by Mr. Costello with all in favor to move up the Attorney's report in the agenda was approved.

Mr. Costello: I will second it.

Mr. d'Adesky: Alright.
Mr. Plummer: Whether it is before or after public comments. Mr. Costello: I am sorry, we have public comment.
Ms. Burns: Because we added that if somebody didn't turn in a form but would like to, we have a couple so if you want to fill them out and bring them up here you are welcome to do so.

THIRD  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public	Comments	on	Specific
Items on the Agenda (speakers will fill out a card and submit it to the District Manager prior to the beginning of the meeting)
Mr. Costello: Ok we have Mr. Sebastian from Coconut Drive.
Mr. Sebastian: Can you hear me? I am John Sebastian. This has nothing to do with the golf course. There are three items. One you may not know, the bowling alley, the water is still coming. I think it was in May you approved $19,400 for Heritage to fix that. I thought they had it fixed. They had walled it up so the problem is still there.
Mr. Costello: We had noticed that the other day, and Christine and I were in there, and it seems whatever the problem was they have gotten to because it was dry when we were there the day before yesterday.
Ms. Wells: Friday.
Mr. Sebastian: Are you sure about that?
Mr. Costello: I am positive. It was bone dry when we were there.
Mr. Sebastian: That was one item. The other one was the gate about security that Bob Plummer brought up last month. I went through the meeting minutes a couple of times and I heard the discussion when I was here. I am a little confused and I guess I need some clarity about what the options are being considered. Just a little more understanding. I would like to see a presentation.
Mr. Costello: I believe, Bob, you are going to have something on that?

Mr. Plummer: I am not today. There was one item that I needed to work on and since I was gone I didn't have the opportunity to meet with the company to do it, so I will do it at a future meeting.
Mr. Sebastian: That is great. Also, at a future meeting I was hoping that we would get the foyer redesign back on the agenda.
Mr. Costello: Ok. Thank you. All of the other ones that I have are on the golf course. I have three others. Since it is limited to three, in an effort to keep things moving I would like to bring them up now.
Mr. James Williams: Good morning. I live at 5272 Pebble Beach Boulevard. We moved to Lake Ashton 2 ½ years ago because of the golf course. We realize that it is a retirement community that offers a variety of activities, pool, fitness center, tennis, restaurants, etc. but when we drove into Lake Ashton, we were overwhelmingly persuaded to do this because it was a golf course community, not just a retirement community. Why am I saying that we were persuaded? Because everything you go to, everything you look at in Lake Ashton circles around the golf course. Every name of every street is named after golf course or something that has to do with a golf course. Even before you go through the gates and look at the emblem on Lake Ashton, the emblem is a golf green with a flag and a cup. There is a reason for that. Ashton is a popular British name associated with numerous golf clubs. To look at that street Pebble Beach Boulevard, Deerfield Street, Ashton Club Boulevard, Mulligan etc. are all named after golf courses. The Eagles Nest is a top name for golf courses so I ask myself, why is everything in Lake Ashton named and related to a golf course. I find my answer in the Lake Ashton COD Ordinance 3 dated March 8, 2002 on the Lake Ashton Living website. Ordinance 3 is a document that adds 40 acres of original Lake Ashton COD. The important factor is that in the exhibit E, the overview of the Lake Ashton Community Development District Section 1.2 states, and I quote, "the development plan for Lake Ashton includes the construction of approximately 800 single family units, 300 multi-family units, a golf course, clubhouse and various other amenities for the residents. The lands proposed to be added to the District would be part of the overall development plan for Lake Ashton". Right there is the reason why everything is related to golf. Lake Ashton was developed to include golf right from the very beginning. It is called a retirement

community but it is also a golf course community. We may or may not own the golf course right now, but how can you ignore the fact that Lake Ashton was developed, promoted, and homes were sold in a retirement community with golf. As Supervisors of CDDs you are responsible to the residents of Florida Statute Chapter 190 to protect all the lands in your jurisdiction. The golf course is the land inside the legal boundaries of Lake Ashton. It is your responsibility to all the homesteaded residents and non-homesteaded residents, all the golfers and all the non-golfers, everyone that lives in Lake Ashton, it is your responsibility to purchase the golf course for a fair and reasonable price, exercise your fiduciary responsibility in order to avoid as much as possible special assessments for the purchase and operation of management and the protection of the value of our property and maintain the integrity of Lake Ashton Community Development District. We need to know whether or not the bonds that the residents of Lake Ashton COD are paying for bought the golf course land and Eagles Nest land and the parking lots. We need to know whether or not the bonds financing the golf course development and construction of the Eagles Nest and if they did, we already own the golf course and the Eagles Nest. If there is other debt associated with the operation and maintenance of the golf course we should not be involved with that. Please do your job to protect the Lake Ashton golf course communities we all love from being destroyed by fear, selfishness and short sidedness. Please stand up and exercise your duties as leaders and finish this acquisition so the issue can be history and we can get on with our lives. Thank you.
Mr. Costello: Tom Dilaura.
Mr. Dilaura: Good morning everyone. First thing I want to do is thank all these people up here for spending their time volunteering to do the job that they are doing. It is not an easy job. I also want to talk a little bit about my coming to Lake Ashton. Lake Ashton is a wonderful place. We wake up every morning we say another day in paradise. It was even more so years ago. The restaurant at that time was run by Larry Maxwell. After 4:00 p.m. you had to wear pants. It was a high end restaurant. It was a five star restaurant here. Our COD decided at that time that we didn't need Larry Maxwell anymore so we did yearly exchange of people running the restaurant. We are probably at the best point we have been since Larry left. It was meant to be a sports bar by Larry, but his wife came in and said she wanted a high end restaurant and she got it, as most wives do, but

anyway, going on after we kicked them out of the restaurant. Then we did the road thing. Every time we do something it ends up hitting us in the face. We are the ones that ended up with the not so good restaurant for a long time. We spent money on the roads. Then after that people wanted to take down Larry about MX Communications. We did that. I don't know about you but my cable bills are a lot higher now than when I paid MX, a lot higher. We wanted to kick dirt in his face and we kicked it in each other's face instead. It is costing us more money. Then we have the election for COD members.  There are a lot of people running this time on the East and I give everyone credit that ran and everyone who got elected. There are people that were for buying the golf course and there were people that were against buying the golf course. The people that were for buying the golf course got elected. My way of thinking that was what Lake Ashton East's residents wanted. That is why we voted for those people to get them in there because we wanted to be part of this golf course. I don't know what happened. They did get elected. They did go forth and got an agreement going, then all of the sudden at a meeting a motion comes up and it all went away. I don't think anybody here knows why. Motion came up, it got seconded, and it was a 4 to 1 vote. We voted them in because they were for the golf course. They turned the other way. They are too intelligent to keep doing that. We need to be part of this golf course. I think the West is trying to do something on their own but we are one community. We are all Lake Ashton. Thank you.
Mr. Costello: The last one I have here is Mr. Harry Krumrie.
Mr. Krumrie: Good morning. Thank you for serving on the Board. It is a hard job. Two members of the Board ran on the platform that they were going to vote for the golf course acquisition. Those two votes went away. With that said, I hope that they come around and vote for the golf course acquisition again but anyway not acquiring the golf course I'm still having trouble as to why you voted in that direction. I'm trying to understand what your thinking was along those lines so to that I ask you as a Board to tell everybody what you perceive to be the worst case scenario if we do not buy the golf course. You obviously went through that thinking process before you voted last month. Secondly, tell us again if you voted to not acquire the golf course, what your best case scenario is. We want to know what your thinking was in terms of why you voted last month the way you did.

Mr. Costello: I can't answer for other members of the Board, but I can tell you that as negotiations went on, they broke down, we were getting less.
A resident: Less what?
Mr. Costello: Let's say we were going to get the building across the street and we were going to get the storage center. That was for starters. That went away. Then all the sudden things come in that it was constantly a breakdown of gimme gimme, don't try and take anything. When they turned around, asked for an extension and we had to give something in order to get an extension, that is when I said I don't want to deal with these people anymore. Had it been me dealing for myself I would have walked away from this a long time ago. Period. I can't answer for the other people but there was a terrible breakdown. I don't think anybody would sit anywhere and put up with, well you have to give me this or we are going to take that. That is not on the table and this is not on the table. That is where I finally came to a decision that you know what, I think we have given up enough. I don't see this golf course going away in the next three years. We don't know but we don't know that it is going to go away either. Either way I don't see it going away. We have other offers on the table and see something I honestly think something is going to happen. Give me a little something for the money. That is all I am asking. I am not asking for me, I am asking for the people of Lake Ashton. Period.
Mr. Deane: I can tell you why I buried the motion. I was tired of all the B.S., all the non-facts about the golf course. Who owns what and who doesn't own what and everything else? It was like dealing with a different person every week. I believe that we should eventually buy, but being the businessman that I was, why should I assume his loss for the next three years when he is obligated to maintain it as it is being maintained at this time? That is why I made the motion to drop the contract at this time.
Mr. d'Adesky: Do you want me to move on with my report? Mr. Costello: Yes, please.
A resident: Why is your house for sale?
Mr. Deane: My house has been for sale for almost two years sir, long before the golf course and it has nothing to do with the golf course. Mike's house is for sale because he bought another house over in the Estates. So the comment about two houses for Board members being for sale because of the golf course is bull.

Mr. d'Adesky: Let me move on with my report so I can talk about some facts and go through the information that we were sent by the counsel for Lake Ashton II. Now we just received this last week so I unfortunately didn't get it for part of the agenda package. It has been distributed to the Board. For the benefit of the public I am going to read through it verbatim although many of you are probably aware of it if you attended the Lake Ashton II Board meeting. Once again what we received was a draft for discussion purposes only. It is a one page sheet with columns for Lake Ashton I, Lake Ashton II and then subject column. I am just going to read through it so everybody knows exactly what is on the sheet. That is a public record. You can request it from Jill, she will be happy to provide to any of you after the meeting if you would like it. It is titled outline for possible new interlocal agreement. Purchase price of the golf course. Lake Ashton I, no funds committed or provided. Lake Ashton II responsible to the extent not funded by golf revenues asterisk. There is an asterisk at the bottom if golf revenues are insufficient, developer advances will be utilized before any LAIi COD general funds are used or special assessments levied. Once again I don't know what that means. This is delivered by the LAIi counsel. I am just reading this verbatim. Bond payoff. LAI, no funds committed. LAIi responsible to the extent not funded by golf revenues. Golf course O&M. LAI no funds committed. LAIi responsible to the extent not funded by golf revenues, further due diligence and closing costs. LAI no funds committed. LAIi responsible. Management of the golf course. LAI no responsibility, LAIi responsible. Maintenance and repair of the golf course. LAI no responsibility, LAIi responsible. Ownership of golf course lands. LAI yes within its boundaries. LAIi yes within its boundaries. Three golf holes of West Course in East. LAI cooperation in transfer. LAIi eventual owner. Long term lease of golf course. LAI lessor for LAI. LAIi lessee for lands in LAI. Lease of maintenance facility. LAI no responsibility, LAIi lessee from seller. Ownership of storm water ponds. LAI yes within its boundaries. LAIi yes within its boundaries. Maintenance and repair of storm water ponds. LAI responsible within its boundaries. LAIi responsible within its boundaries. Ownership of paths and bridges. I assume paths means golf cart paths. LAI yes within its boundaries. LAIi yes within its boundaries. Maintenance and repair of paths and bridges. LAI responsible within its boundaries. LAIi responsible within its boundaries. Reciprocal easement for paths and bridges. LAI yes. LAIi yes. Equal golf rates. LAI yes.

LAIi yes. That is the total of the document. We received this with the intent we had a follow-up call from their counsel just to receive the general mood, intent, and opinion of this Board openness on an interlocal agreement regarding the golf course.
Mr. Plummer: Thanks for the report, Andrew. I appreciate that. Obviously you have bullet points of all those things outlined, as we all know the devil is in the details.
Mr. d'Adesky: Absolutely.
Mr. Plummer: As to when and if that was decided to go in that direction there, obviously would be other documents that would put the interlocal together that would take each one of those down to the basement level if you will.
Mr. d'Adesky: Right.
Mr. Plummer: I just want to make that clear. This was not a proposal as a final document. This was just a bullet point of discussion.
Mr. d'Adesky: Absolutely. There is nothing to approve here. We have no details, no actual written out interlocal agreement previously. Under previous consideration we have had a fully detailed interlocal agreement which is what this Board would need before it would approve. This is just the conceptual interest in this, yes or no.
Mr. Costello: This was nothing more than what I brought out at the joint meeting where we would more or less own the land and we would rent it to them. Am I right or wrong?
Mr. d'Adesky: It is conceptually the same framework. The details might work out differently. As Supervisor Plummer said, those are significant detail.
Mr. Costello: What I am saying is basically I had said at the last joint meeting that maybe it would be in our best interest to buy it and to rent them the property. It went nowhere. Personally we have a meeting with them when the 27th of September I think?
Ms. Burns: Correct.
Mr. Costello: If they want to move the meeting up? No? Mr. Plummer: I am going to be gone.
Mr. Costello: Personally I think it is going to have to be tweaked a little. Mr. Plummer: I think it is a great starting point.
Mr. Costello: And so do I. I think that this here is going to satisfy our needs in the end. That is my personal belief.

Mr. d'Adesky: I think if we indicate interest, I think their counsel will go ahead and draft up the form of the interlocal agreement and bring that back to present in a more flushed out detail.
Mr. Costello: When is our next regular meeting? Ms. Burns: September 16th.
Mr. Costello: We would have a meeting prior to the joint meeting. Mr. d'Adesky: Correct.
Mr. Costello: Will you be here for that, Bob? Mr. Plummer: Yes.
Mr. Costello: Personally I would like to make a motion that we authorize Andrew to go back to their attorney and say we have an interest in it and that we would all discuss it at the next joint meeting.
Mr. Plummer: I think that is correct. I think an interest in it is the proper terminology to use in this particular case. Whether we agree with each bullet point detail remains to be discussed and decided. Then after that obviously if it gets to the point where there is an interlocal agreement, then that becomes also obviously a cumbersome process to get that to where that is accepted by both Boards.
Mr. d'Adesky: As you mentioned there are things missing in this list. One that was mentioned that is very significant is what is the rent? That was a significant factor that I talked about with Supervisor Costello. There is significant amount of friction in what the possible rent amount is. So that is a significant bullet point that needs to be discussed.
Mr. Costello: Quite honestly, I mean I think that we could be extremely reasonable. Mr. d'Adesky: Just so I make sure I have Board consensus to go back, Supervisor
Deane and Supervisor Ference, are you on board?
Ms. Burns: We have a motion from Mike.
Mr. Plummer: I just want to clarify the motion, that the motion is to agree in concept and not in substance if you will? Concept of the idea?
Mr. d'Adesky: Yes.
Mr. Costello: That you bring it forward and that we would be willing to discuss it.
Mr. Plummer: I don't want to go through each bullet point, but there is some that need a little more scrutinizing than others.

Mr. Costello: Precisely.
Mr. Ference: This draft came from Lake Ashton II?
Mr. d'Adesky: Yes their counsel. Mike Eckert sent that to us. Mr. Ference: Have the golf course people seen this at all?
Mr. d'Adesky: I am sure they have. I think I saw Jim in the room. He could raise his hand if he has seen it.

Mr. Ference: So we have no comment. This is between the two CDDs? Mr. d'Adesky: Yes.

Mr. Costello: It is an interlocal agreement. We have a motion on the floor. Do I have a second?
Mr. Deane: Second.

On MOTION by Mr. Costello seconded by Mr. Deane with all in favor, direction was approved and given to District Counsel from Lake Ashton COD to pursue the interlocal agreement with District Counsel from Lake Ashton II COD.

Mr. Costello: Do you have anything else, Andrew?
Mr. d'Adesky: Yes, one thing. I know I put the dog park issue on hiatus because it would be violating our deal with the golf course. Now it is not. So now I will push that in this interim and see if we can get that resolved.
Mr. Deane: Something else to push too, the drainage problem on the road. We have an over $200,000 repair we have to do to fix the drainage so it stops flooding the house. I would like to ask the golf course, not asking them for money, I am asking their permission to run the drain through the putting green. We will put the putting green back, which would save us roughly $80,000 in that repair. The repair is because of all the water that comes down the road and off the golf course and floods in that road. I would want that pushed forward also at this time.
Mr. d'Adesky: Rey, have you done plans for that?
Mr. Malave: We have not. He did mention it to me. One of the options that we had talked about originally under the scenario of ownership of that golf course, we talked about it three or four months ago. Having that land that is available there could create an option of being able to tame the water and resurface it without tearing a lot of the landscaping

and some of the golf course. That is where the savings would go. We would have to finalize that design to be able to put it in a form to give to a contractor to get a bid price for it.

Mr. d'Adesky: You could get an overhead of the easement area that you would need.
Mr. Malave: Yes. We could put that together and say here is what we would need and here is where we would bring our pipe and here is the easement we would need.
Mr. d'Adesky: Ok.
Mr. Plummer: I have a question to Borden's statement. Did we have a house flood, or did we have one that was threatened?
Mr. Deane: It has been within four inches of their garage door. Mr. Costello: I don't think it is fair to wait.
Mr. Deane: This has been going on for years. This is something that has to be done. Mr. Plummer: House flooded is exactly what I heard and I just wanted to clarify that.
Mr. Costello: We haven't that I know of, but by the same token, I don't want to wait till that happens. I think these people have lived long enough with this nightmare and it is about time we ended it for them.
Mr. Costello: Anything else, Andrew?
Mr. d'Adesky: That is it unless there is any other surprises.
Mr. Ference: One question I have Andrew. Do we have from the golf course ownership a timeline as to when they expect to consummate the sale of the golf course through us or someone else?
Mr. d'Adesky: No.
Mr. Ference: Because one of the reasons LAI is not that we did not want to own the golf course, we just thought it was too soon for us to make a commitment to buy the golf course when the owner, as we noticed three more years to maintain the golf course as per his covenants with the sale of houses etc. etc. I don't want to be misunderstood that LA I did not want to own the golf course or buy the golf course property. I think there was a consensus on our Board that we might have been premature in our anxiety to buy the golf course before time and that we had time on our side. Now have we learned that

we don't have time on our side? Is the seller desiring to sell the golf course by a timeline or do we have time on our side?
Mr. d'Adesky: I don't think we had any comment recently, but I think in the course of the negotiations we have been ongoing for the past year or so, I think that in our meetings it was conveyed to us that this was something that they wanted to happen as soon as possible, but once again that doesn't mean that is a required deadline or that is something necessarily that had to be met. That was just an expressed intent. We want to move this ASAP.
Mr. Costello: It had started that way and they had asked for an answer by a certain date. We didn't get that to them. They put it out to Billy Casper I think it was. Billy Casper came in and looked at it. They did their due diligence and decided that they weren't going to make an offer or they weren't going to proceed any further on buying it. That is when we had the right of first refusal I guess. That is when we came back in. It went back and forth and I like I say as far as I am concerned it constantly broke down. There is a way to do it. If we can go with this I think that this here is what everybody wants I guess.
Mr. Ference: We had a wonderfully workable interlocal agreement had we not before we voted against purchasing the land?
Mr. d'Adesky: The way the interlocal agreement was set up previously, I discussed this in the joint meeting and I think that their counsel concurred, it wasn't set up for a lease arrangement. It would need to be restructured to fit what is in this sheet.
Mr. Ference: Suppose we go back and not consider a lease but a purchase lease. Mr. d'Adesky: We would still need an interlocal agreement.
Mr. Costello: We are just going in circles. That is all that we are doing.
Mr. Plummer: That is why the form that was presented was a draft of bullet points for a new interlocal agreement because of the changes in the structure of purchase/ ownership/ and operations.
Mr. d'Adesky: I think you guys saw the legal bills. I don't think you want to keep paying those each time to keep redrafting the interlocal agreement.
Mr. Plummer: Quite frankly, we don't want to pay the ones we already have. Mr. d'Adesky: I understand that.

Mr. Plummer: I think that going back and at least working on something that is being proposed is a step forward in trying to get some of the separation or some of the animosity between the East and the West taken care of. Get us back on the table as being one community. I think through this whole situation the thing that has disappointed me the most is the division it drives between the East and the West, and I am really disappointed in where we are at right now with that.
Mr. Costello: I can agree with you on that, but I think it is more golfers against non­ golfers. That is the way I perceive it. I have been wrong before.
Mr. Ference: Andrew, we talk about division. You talk about lease and lessor, how are we ever going to come to a common agreement on both sides about what should be leased and how much a lessor should pay.
Mr. d'Adesky: I think when you are planning anything you start out with your higher level, then you move to your specifics. I think you really need to focus, I think last time we could have done a more efficient job of focusing on the big picture stuff first. The conceptual make sure you guys are really on the same page conceptually because there were certain issues that we weren't, and some of those were not our fault for example the bond issue switching was really something that switched due to the seller changing his position on it. We have to make sure conceptually we are all on the same page. As to how this is going to work out conceptually so as we are moving forward we are on the same page, one community moving forward with one vision and one mission and achieving the objectives.
Mr. Plummer: I am going to put that in a couple of words. Good faith negotiations is all we are talking about.
Mr. d'Adesky: Right. I think that is required amongst both of the Districts and the seller, as well.

FOURTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes of the July
22, 2019 Meeting
Mr. Costello: Approval of the minutes from the July 22, 2019 meeting.

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Costello with all in favor, the minutes of the July 22, 2019 meeting were approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Engineer's Report
Mr. Costello: Engineer's report.
Mr. Malave: This is a good reference for everybody to see where all the lakes are. What I have given you all is an aerial of all the lake systems that we own. Specifically looking at, we have been working with Christine and Matt on the two issues of the ponds that were getting to the top. One of the options that we can do later is look at those two lakes. They were designed as aesthetic looking lakes. They are supposed be for storage and recovery by themselves through ground. That is the way they were designed. One of the things that they probably should have had was an emergency outflow that would be in place in case this particular situation would have come up. That is options that we can do. The two lakes we are talking about are ones down on the south side which I presume you are very familiar with.
Mr. Plummer: The two that are unnumbered correct?
Mr. Malave: Yes. They are on Blackmore and Litchfield. The two retention ponds that are on the lakeside of those lots is a retention pond with a control structure that goes into the lake. By discharging into that lake and as you noticed by our permit that we got from S.F.W.M.D. about the temporary pumping, that is where we can still discharge our water and that is where the water quality and storm continuation is taking place. That is an option that we can look at if the Board desires, and providing maybe some possibility of those two ponds having a permanent emergency outfall so that this does not happen again and you don't have to worry about pumping out.
Mr. Plummer: Will the outfall go to one of the numbered ponds or does it go to the one across Litchfield?
Mr. Malave: It goes to that one. It does not have a number because it was called Phase 5 pond.
Mr. Plummer: And it does have an outflow structure on it?
Mr. Malave: It actually has more than one. It is working fairly well, as best you can see. Even though Lake Ashton is pretty high, or it is today. That is one option. The other if you look at where the clubhouse is between Lake 20 and Lake 19, is the specific area we are talking about that we would try to put an outfall behind where that little putting green is. Then, along the back of those lots to get it to Pond 19.

Please note that due to equipment failure, the rest of meeting was unable to be transcribed verbatim. The following is a summary of  actions taken by the  Board of Supervisors at the meeting.

SIXTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Unfinished Business
Mr. Plummer stated that he would have a security presentation for the September meeting to present.

SEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	New	Business	and	Supervisors
Requests
A. Ratification of Data - Sharing and Usage Agreement with Polk County Property Appraiser
The data sharing and usage agreement with the Polk County Property Appraiser was presented and a motion to ratify it was made.

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Plummer with all in favor the Data Sharing and Usage Agreement with Polk County Property Appraiser was approved.

A solar presentation was presented to the Board.
Supervisor Plummer asked when the last time engineering services had been bid and thought that it may be worth exploring. Board requested to put an engineering RFQ on the September agenda.

On MOTION by Mr. Plummer seconded by Mr. Costello with all in favor motion including an engineering RFQ on the September agenda was approved.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Attorney
Community Director
Monthly Report

Staff Reports

Consideration of Quotes to Replace Three Doors
Ms. Wells reviewed her monthly report that was included in the agenda package, and also presented numerous proposals for various projects for the community. The Board approved a request to move rounders to the wall and off the desk.

On MOTION by Mr. Plummer seconded by Mr. Deane with all in favor the request to move rounders off the desk and onto the wall was approved.

Ms. Wells presented a request from the Fine Arts Club for funding for additional panels and hangers, which was approved by the Board.

On MOTION by Mr. Ference seconded  by Mr. Deane with all in favor the request for additional panels and hangers for the Fine Arts Club was approved.

A State of Florida flag was donated and it has been requested for it to be added to the stage. The estimated cost of approximately $110 for the pole and base was approved by the Board.

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Costello with all in favor proposal to add the State of Florida flag to the stage for an approximate cost of $110 for the pole and base was approved.

Ms. Wells presented a quote to put a sealant on the roof of the guardhouse. A not- to-exceed amount of $2,000 was approved by the Board.

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Ference with all in favor a not-to-exceed amount of $2,000 was approved to put a sealant on the roof of the guardhouse.

Ms. Wells presented a quote for two elliptical machines in the gym in the amount of $828.94 and $803.94. The Board approved this request.

On MOTION by Mr. Ference seconded by Mr. Deane with all in favor a proposal to purchase two ellipticals in the amounts of $828.94 and $803.94 was approved.

Ms. Wells presented quotes to replace three doors in the amount of $2,145, two doors on the west side of the clubhouse and a door on the south patio. This was approved by the Board.

On MOTION by Mr. Ference seconded by Mr. Plummer with all in favor proposal to replace three doors was approved in the amount of $2,145.

Field Operations Manager - Monthly Report
Mr. Fisher outlined the monthly report that was included in the agenda package.

CDD Manager
There not being any report, the next item followed.

NINTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Approval of the Check Run Summary
Combined Balance Sheet
Ms. Burns presented the check run summary and the combined balance sheet, which were included in the agenda package. A motion by the Board approving the check run summary took place.

On MOTION by Mr. Deane seconded by Mr. Plummer with all in favor the check run summary was approved.

No action was needed for the Combined Balance Sheet.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
There not being any, the next item followed.

ELEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
There not being any further business to discuss,

On MOTION by Mr. Ference seconded by Mr. Deane with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

August 19, 2019	lak jshton CDD

 1/udto
Assistant Secretary/Secretary